Rudi Iskandar Ichlas
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Prevention of budget leakage through law enforcement in the tax sector in Kendari City Tasmir; Ahmad Rustan; Rudi Iskandar Ichlas; Wahyudi Umar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.5853

Abstract

Research discussing the prevention of budget leakage through law enforcement in the tax sector is an effort to overcome the problem of budget leakage which is one of the main problems in the country's financial sector. The urgency of this research is to minimize state financial losses due to budget leakage and strengthen the integrity of the tax sector in Kendari City. To achieve the expected goals, researchers will adapt research procedures with mixed methods using several data collection techniques such as interviews, questionnaires, literature studies, and conducting focus group discussions (FGDs). In conducting this research, researchers must also pay attention to ethical aspects of research, such as data privacy and security, and maintain academic integrity. This study aims to identify the factors that cause budget leakage, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of law enforcement in preventing budget leakage in the tax sector. Thus, this study is expected to provide appropriate recommendations to overcome the problem of budget leakage that occurs in the tax sector in Kendari City. The results of this study are expected to be policy recommendations that can help improve the effectiveness of law enforcement and prevent budget leakage in the tax sector in Kendari City. In addition, this research can also contribute to the development of science, especially in the fields of law and public finance.
Perbandingan Kebijakan Pengendalian Deforestasi dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia dan Australia Kisran Kisran; Ahmad Rustan; Rudi Iskandar Ichlas
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study comparatively analyzes deforestation control policies and law enforcement in Indonesia and Australia. The research uses normative juridical methods with legislative and comparative approaches, supported by secondary data on deforestation trends, regulatory instruments, and law enforcement practices in both countries. The analysis shows that Indonesia has a relatively comprehensive regulatory framework but faces serious obstacles at the level of implementation, including weak institutional coordination, inconsistent enforcement of sanctions, and the influence of economic interests in forest utilization. In contrast, Australia tends to rely on a combination of command-and-control instruments, market mechanisms, and a more stringent and transparent surveillance and sanctions system at the federal and state levels, thus providing a relatively stronger deterrent effect. This comparison reveals that differences in institutional design, quality of governance, and level of public participation contribute significantly to the effectiveness of deforestation control in each country. This article recommends strengthening cross-sectoral coordination, increasing the independence and capacity of law enforcement, and expanding public participation and oversight mechanisms as policy lessons that can be adapted to improve deforestation control in Indonesia
Analisis Hukum Terbitnya Sertifikat Ganda dan Mekanisme Penyelesaiannya Sitti Annisa; Ahmad Rustan; Rudi Iskandar Ichlas; Wahyudi Umar
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 5 No 9 (2024): Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v5i9.830

Abstract

Control of the land plot must be proven through a valid certificate of ownership. In its development, it was found that there were duplicate certificates that overlapped each other. This study aims to provide an analysis related to the issuance of double certificates and the mechanism for their completion. This research is a normative juridical research with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that double certificates arise as a result of various factors, including administrative errors, lack of supervision, and the practice of abuse of authority in issuing certificates, thus creating legal uncertainty for land rights holders. The legal settlement requires a comprehensive approach, involving the improvement of the land administration system, and strict enforcement of any violations.
Akibat Hukum Pembuatan Akta Oleh Notaris Di Luar Wilayah Jabatan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Alamsyah R; Ahmad Rustan; Rudi Iskandar Ichlas
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.2467

Abstract

The state delegates authority to a notary as a public official to prepare authentic deeds that serve as the strongest evidence in the civil law process. Notaries in issuing deeds are based on legitimate authority including the scope of the substance of the authority regarding the scope of the authority's validity. However, in carrying out their duties, cases of Notaries still occur who exercise their authority beyond the scope of their position, which has the potential to cause legal problems and uncertainty for various interested parties. This is relevant because the validity and strength of a deed depend on the authority of the official who made it. This study aims to examine the legal implications of the preparation of deeds by Notaries carried out outside the scope of their territorial authority as regulated in the Notary Law (UUJN), as well as examine the form of legal liability that can be applied to Notaries who violate the provisions. The results of the analysis show that the deeds made by Notaries outside the scope of their authority do not meet the formal requirements required for authentic deeds according to Article 1868 of the Civil Code, so they lose their authenticity and have evidentiary value as private deeds. From an administrative law perspective, if a decision is made that is not based on legitimate authority, the legal consequence is that the decision is null and void.