Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
I Made Wirya Darma
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementation of the Principle of Proportionality in Criminal Sentencing in Indonesia Axl Mattew Situmorang; I Gede Agus Kurniawan; I Made Wirya Darma
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6487

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the normative implementation of the principle of proportionality in the imposition of criminal penalties in Indonesia. The principle of proportionality is a fundamental concept in criminal law that requires the punishment imposed to be balanced and commensurate with the degree of fault and the impact of the criminal act committed. This research employs a normative juridical method with statute approach, conceptual approach, and legal doctrine approach. Data were collected through literature studies of relevant legislation, legal doctrines, and court decisions. The findings indicate that although the principle of proportionality has been regulated in various Indonesian laws and regulations, its application in criminal justice practice still faces several obstacles, such as judicial subjectivity and inconsistency in sentencing. Furthermore, cases have been found where the penalties imposed are disproportionate to the offender’s level of fault, potentially resulting in injustice. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening guidelines for applying the principle of proportionality within the criminal justice system, including training for law enforcement officers and the development of clearer and more measurable sentencing standards. It is expected that this research will contribute to the advancement of a more just and civilized criminal law system in Indonesia through the consistent and appropriate application of the principle of proportionality.
The Rights of Families of Terminal Patients to Refuse Futile Treatment: Legal and Ethical Limitations Primanto Tantiono; I Made Wirya Darma; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7104

Abstract

Patients in terminal conditions are frequently subjected to futile medical interventions, namely treatments that no longer provide therapeutic benefits and merely prolong the biological process of life without improving its quality. This situation creates a dilemma between the family’s right to refuse such interventions and the physician’s professional obligations bound by ethical oaths and legal frameworks. In Indonesia, the regulation regarding the refusal of futile treatment by families of terminal patients remains ambiguous, leading to legal uncertainty and potential conflicts in healthcare practice. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal boundaries governing the authority of families of terminal patients to refuse futile medical treatment and to examine medical ethical principles as the basis for legitimizing such rights. This research adopts a normative legal method with a conceptual approach, focusing on the study of legislation, legal doctrines, academic literature, and professional codes of ethics. The findings reveal that the legal foundation for the family’s authority to refuse futile treatment can be traced through the principle of informed consent as stipulated in the Medical Practice Act and the rights of patients in the Health Act. However, the absence of explicit regulation creates a wide scope for interpretation, which may trigger disputes. From an ethical standpoint, the family’s right to refuse futile interventions gains legitimacy through the principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The originality of this research lies in its integration of normative legal analysis with medical ethics principles, emphasizing the urgency of establishing specific regulations to ensure legal certainty while safeguarding patient dignity
Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability Challenges for Contemporary Penal Law Kadek Panji Kumara Adi; I Made Wirya Darma; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Contemporary criminal law faces a significant paradigmatic challenge with the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a non-human entity capable of autonomous action and producing legally relevant consequences. The traditional criminal law system—rooted in an anthropocentric paradigm that attributes mens rea and actus reus exclusively to human actors—has become inadequate in explaining liability within the context of autonomous and adaptive algorithmic decision-making. This study aims to analyze how the criminal law system responds to actions and decisions generated by AI that result in legal consequences, and to formulate a conceptual model of AI criminal liability that ensures legal certainty, justice, and accountability. The research employs a normative legal method with a conceptual approach. The findings reveal that the criminal law system encounters both a culpability gap and a liability gap due to the absence of a legal subject that can be held directly accountable for AI’s actions. A reconstruction of the criminal law paradigm is therefore necessary through the adoption of a hybrid criminal liability framework that integrates human, corporate, and AI accountability based on the degree of control and risk creation. This study recommends limited recognition of electronic personhood for certain AI entities, alongside the application of risk-based accountability and the precautionary principle as new normative foundations for establishing an adaptive, accountable, and just criminal law system in the digital era
Co-Authors Axl Mattew Situmorang I Gede Agus Kurniawan Kadek Panji Kumara Adi Primanto Tantiono