Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.235
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Inicio Legis : Jurnal Hukum Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan
I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Doktrin Strict Liability sebagai Inclusive Mechanism Bagi Konsumen yang Dirugikan Akibat Ketidaksesuaian antara Produk dengan Gambar dalam Transaksi E-Commerce: Perspektif Hukum Inklusif: An Inclusive Legal Perspective I Gede Yudi Mahendra; Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7032

Abstract

The rapid growth of e-commerce has created both opportunities and challenges in consumer protection, particularly in cases where products do not match the images displayed on digital platforms. This situation raises legal concerns because consumers often find themselves in a weak position to prove the fault of business actors. The prevailing paradigm of fault-based liability is considered less effective in ensuring access to justice, thereby necessitating a more inclusive legal mechanism. This study aims to analyze the liability of business actors within the framework of Indonesian positive law and to formulate the doctrine of strict liability as an inclusive legal mechanism in e-commerce transactions. The research employs a normative juridical method with both conceptual and statutory approaches. The findings indicate that although Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, the Indonesian Civil Code, and Law No. 11 of 2008 as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions regulate the obligations of business actors, the fault-based paradigm still hinders consumers from obtaining effective protection. The novelty of this research lies in proposing the formulation of strict liability within an inclusive legal framework, where liability is automatically attached to business actors without requiring proof of fault. This concept is expected to strengthen consumer protection while ensuring a fair balance of interests in the digital trade ecosystem
International Arbitration as a Pillar of Modern International Law: A Doctrinal and Practical Overview I Made Suwandana Putra; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7064

Abstract

International arbitration has emerged as a key mechanism for resolving cross-border disputes in the modern era of international law. As an alternative to national judicial systems, arbitration offers a neutral forum capable of providing legal certainty and protecting the interests of parties, including states, multinational corporations, and individuals. This article examines the role of international arbitration as a pillar of international law, using both doctrinal and practical approaches. From a doctrinal perspective, arbitration is understood through basic principles such as party autonomy, neutrality, finality of awards, and international recognition of arbitration outcomes. From a practical perspective, the discussion covers the effectiveness of international arbitration institutions, such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), as well as the challenges of practical implementation, including costs, delays, and potential conflicts with domestic legal interests. This article argues that international arbitration is not merely a technical dispute resolution instrument but also a normative instrument that strengthens the legitimacy and stability of the international legal system. Thus, international arbitration can be viewed as a crucial foundation underpinning the development of contemporary international law, as well as a strategic tool for maintaining a balance between national interests and the global order.
Online Dispute Resolution as a Progressive Paradigm for Consumer Dispute Resolution in E-Commerce Transactions Mochammad Lukman Hakim; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7095

Abstract

The rapid growth of e-commerce has introduced new challenges in consumer protection, particularly regarding dispute resolution mechanisms. Conventional pathways through the courts or the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (BPSK) have proven inadequate in addressing the complexities of online transactions, which are characterized by cross-border interactions, speed, and relatively small economic values. This situation creates a gap between consumers’ rights to justice and the effectiveness of available dispute resolution mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the limitations of conventional mechanisms in resolving consumer disputes in e-commerce and to explore the role of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) as a progressive paradigm capable of ensuring legal certainty and consumer protection. The research employs a normative juridical method with a conceptual and legislative approach, examining the compatibility of national regulations with the legal needs of the digital era. The findings reveal that conventional mechanisms are insufficiently adaptive to electronic evidence, hindered by jurisdictional barriers, and inefficient in terms of costs and procedures, thereby reducing consumer access to justice. In contrast, ODR offers a more progressive solution by leveraging technology to provide faster, more affordable, and cross-jurisdictional dispute resolution. The novelty of this research lies in positioning ODR not merely as an alternative mechanism but as a progressive legal paradigm that balances legal certainty with consumer protection. This contributes significantly to the development of a more responsive national legal system in addressing digital challenges.
Visas as Preventive Legal Protection for the Sovereignty of the State of Indonesia: The Perspective of the Selective Policy Principle in Indonesian Immigration Law Ni Putu Pera Krisna Dewi; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7096

Abstract

A visa is understood as a specific permit to reside for foreign nationals. In Indonesia, Law No. 6/2011 on Immigration affirms the applicability of the Selective Policy principle to ensure that not everyone can easily stay in Indonesia, particularly with certain requirements to ensure national security and sovereignty. This research aims to analyze visas as an instrument of preventive legal protection for Indonesia's national sovereignty in relation to the implementation of the Selective Policy principle. This research is normative legal research with a conceptual and legislative approach. The research findings confirm that visas are a preventive legal protection effort for the sovereignty of the Indonesian state because they allow for the identification of the background of individuals seeking residency permits in Indonesia. As a preventive legal protection effort for state sovereignty, visas are relevant to the principle of Selective Policy in Indonesian immigration law, which emphasizes state sovereignty and security as the most important aspects, making the restriction of residency permits thru visas relevant.
The Rights of Families of Terminal Patients to Refuse Futile Treatment: Legal and Ethical Limitations Primanto Tantiono; I Made Wirya Darma; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7104

Abstract

Patients in terminal conditions are frequently subjected to futile medical interventions, namely treatments that no longer provide therapeutic benefits and merely prolong the biological process of life without improving its quality. This situation creates a dilemma between the family’s right to refuse such interventions and the physician’s professional obligations bound by ethical oaths and legal frameworks. In Indonesia, the regulation regarding the refusal of futile treatment by families of terminal patients remains ambiguous, leading to legal uncertainty and potential conflicts in healthcare practice. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal boundaries governing the authority of families of terminal patients to refuse futile medical treatment and to examine medical ethical principles as the basis for legitimizing such rights. This research adopts a normative legal method with a conceptual approach, focusing on the study of legislation, legal doctrines, academic literature, and professional codes of ethics. The findings reveal that the legal foundation for the family’s authority to refuse futile treatment can be traced through the principle of informed consent as stipulated in the Medical Practice Act and the rights of patients in the Health Act. However, the absence of explicit regulation creates a wide scope for interpretation, which may trigger disputes. From an ethical standpoint, the family’s right to refuse futile interventions gains legitimacy through the principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The originality of this research lies in its integration of normative legal analysis with medical ethics principles, emphasizing the urgency of establishing specific regulations to ensure legal certainty while safeguarding patient dignity
Legal Philosophy in Construction Contract Dispute Resolution: Between Arbitration and Litigation I Wayan Lastikayasa; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7122

Abstract

Disputes in construction contracts are a common occurrence due to project complexity, differing interpretations of clauses, and delays in work execution. In practice, two main dispute resolution paths are often chosen: arbitration and litigation. This study stems from the need to examine these dispute resolution mechanisms not only from a procedural perspective but also from a legal philosophy perspective that emphasizes the values ​​of justice, legal certainty, and expediency. The purpose of this study is to understand how legal philosophy can serve as a basis for selecting and assessing the effectiveness of arbitration and litigation as forums for resolving construction contract disputes. This study uses a juridical-normative method with a qualitative approach, supported by a comparative analysis of regulations, arbitration and court decisions, and relevant legal philosophy literature. The analysis shows that arbitration emphasizes efficiency, confidentiality, and procedural flexibility, thus closer to the values ​​of expediency and legal certainty. Conversely, litigation offers formal legitimacy, transparency, and broader legal protection, reflecting the values ​​of formal justice. However, both have limitations: arbitration is often hampered by high costs, while litigation is often protracted. The selection of a dispute resolution mechanism in a construction contract should be based not only on practical aspects but also on philosophical considerations regarding the objectives of the law. Thus, the integration of justice, certainty, and expediency can serve as a primary guideline in determining the most appropriate dispute resolution forum
Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata: Tinjauan Teori Hukum Responsif Nonet dan Selznick I Putu Windu Semara Putra; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7123

Abstract

Civil procedural law is the primary instrument for resolving civil disputes in court. However, in practice, criticism often arises that existing procedures tend to be rigid, formalistic, and do not always meet the needs of justice seekers. The responsive legal theory developed by Nonet and Selznick offers an analytical framework for assessing the extent to which the legal system is able to adapt to the aspirations and interests of society. This study aims to examine how civil procedural law in Indonesia functions in resolving civil disputes and to assess the extent to which its application can be categorized as responsive law, according to Nonet and Selznick's theory. This study uses a normative-juridical approach with a literature review. Data were obtained from relevant laws and regulations, legal literature, and court decisions, then analyzed qualitatively through the perspective of responsive legal theory. The analysis shows that although civil procedural law has provided a formal mechanism for resolving disputes, its implementation is often procedural and slow. This creates a gap between legal norms and the reality of justice seekers. Within the theoretical framework of Nonet and Selznick, Indonesian civil procedural law tends to be at the stage of "autonomous law," which emphasizes formal rules, but has not yet fully reached the stage of "responsive law," which is oriented towards substantive justice and social needs. Civil procedural law needs to be directed in a more responsive direction by simplifying procedures, improving access to justice, and emphasizing fair resolution for the parties. Thus, law becomes not only a procedural tool, but also an instrument of justice that lives within society.
KAJIAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL TERHADAP KEKELIRUAN DALAM MENETAPKAN MEREK DENGAN PERSAMAAN ESENSIAL Virgina Ayu Aisyah; I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Komang Satria Wibawa Putra; Bagus Gede Ari Rama
Inicio Legis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Vol 6, No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/il.v6i2.31605

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas kewenangan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DJKI) dalam mencegah pendaftaran merek yang memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya serta bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum atas kelalaian yang mungkin timbul dalam proses pemeriksaannya. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, DJKI memiliki kewenangan atributif yang bersifat imperatif untuk menolak pendaftaran merek yang berpotensi menimbulkan kebingungan konsumen, merugikan pemilik hak yang sudah ada, atau mendorong praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Dalam kerangka hukum administrasi, kewenangan ini dipandang sebagai instrumen penting untuk menjaga kepastian hukum sekaligus perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual. Namun, ketika DJKI lalai menjalankan kewenangan tersebut, konsekuensi hukum yang timbul tidak hanya bersifat administratif, tetapi juga dapat berimplikasi pada tanggung jawab perdata bahkan melalui mekanisme gugatan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Hal ini sejalan dengan teori pertanggungjawaban hukum yang menempatkan organ negara sebagai pihak yang dapat dimintakan tanggung jawab apabila tindakan lalai atau keliru menimbulkan kerugian bagi masyarakat. Di sisi lain, kelalaian tersebut juga berdampak pada dimensi sosial, berupa potensi kerugian ekonomi, turunnya kepercayaan publik, serta berkurangnya legitimasi sistem hukum kekayaan intelektual. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya penguatan mekanisme pemeriksaan merek melalui peningkatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, penggunaan teknologi pendukung, serta pembentukan regulasi turunan yang lebih rinci mengenai tanggung jawab administrasi. Dengan langkah-langkah tersebut, diharapkan sistem pendaftaran merek di Indonesia dapat berjalan secara transparan, akuntabel, dan mampu memberikan perlindungan hukum yang optimal.Kata Kunci: BUMN, Efisiensi BUMN, Rasionalitas Ekonomi. DJKI, kewenangan hukum, pertanggungjawaban hukum, merek, kekayaan intelektual
Analisis Komparatif Perjanjian Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia dan Spanyol dalam Kerangka Hukum Kontrak dan Bisnis I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Antonio Gutiérrez Pozo
Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 11 No 01 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2026.v11.i01.p14

Abstract

Penelitian ini secara khusus bertujuan menganalisis terkait analisis komparatif perjanjian kekayaan intelektual di Indonesia dan Spanyol dalam kerangka hukum kontrak dan bisnis. Hal ini dikarenakan oleh perjanjian kekayaan intelektual menempati kedudukan yang penting dalam hukum kontrak sebagai bagian dari bidang hukum bisnis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum doktrinal-normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menegaskan bahwa kedudukan hukum perjanjian kekayaan intelektual (HKI) dalam perspektif kontrak dan hukum bisnis bersifat integral sebagai lex specialis derogat legi generali dan good faith untuk klausul royalti. Perbedaan pengaturan perjanjian kekayaan intelektual di Indonesia, menekankanpengaturan komprehensif selaras TRIPS/WIPO sedangkan di Spanyol dengan mengintegrasikan LPI RDL 1/1996 (Ley 21/2014/RDL 8/2021). Indonesia dan Sapanyol perlu mengatur secara spesifik perjanjian kekayaan intelektual yang berkeadilan dan menjamin hak-hak para pihak.
The Regulation Reform of Intellectual Property Following the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence: Guidance and Reevaluation I Gede Putu Harry Gelary Astawa; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5448

Abstract

This study seeks to examine the impact of ArtificialIntelligence (AI) development on contemporaryintellectual property concepts and regulations, and topropose necessary reforms to address legal challenges insafeguarding works generated by AI. This study employsnormative legal research methodologies, utilizing bothlegislative and conceptual approaches to examine andrevise intellectual property regulations in relation to theadvancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology,through literature reviews and qualitative analysisemploying deductive-inductive reasoning. The study'sfindings indicate that the advancement of ArtificialIntelligence (AI) capable of generating original works haspresented considerable difficulties to the currentunderstanding and governance of intellectual property.Existing legislation, such as the Copyright and Patent Lawin Indonesia, do not recognize AI as a creator or inventor,resulting in legal ambiguities and discussions around theownership rights of AI-generated works. Regulatoryreform is necessary, encompassing the expansion of thedefinitions of creator and inventor, revision of patent laws,modification of regulations pertaining to brands andindustrial designs, establishment of a dedicated institutionfor AI and intellectual property matters, and thedevelopment of suitable implementation and enforcementmechanisms. This reformulation must consideradvancements in international law and need Indonesia'sactive engagement in pertinent global forums.
Co-Authors Anisa Defbi Mariana Antin Ekaningtyas Widhar Utami Antonio Gutiérrez Pozo Bagus Gede Ari Rama I Gede Putu Harry Gelary Astawa I Gede Yudi Mahendra I Kadek Prajadwiva Baskara Dana I Kadek Widi Pranajaya I Made Suwandana Putra I Made Wirya Darma I Nyoman Budiana I Putu Bogi Danuarta I Putu Windu Semara Putra I Wayan Lastikayasa Indrawan Hadiyanto Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma Kadek Novita Dewi Kadek Panji Kumara Adi Kadek Putri Nirmala Dewi Komang Satria Wibawa Putra Mochammad Lukman Hakim N Agus Adyatma Narwadi Ni Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Tri Wulandari Ni Komang Sri Oka Mariana Dewi Ni Putu Fitriani Ni Putu Pera Krisna Dewi Nur Anisa Primanto Tantiono Putu Anggi Abelia Artha Virgina Ayu Aisyah