Kaharuddin Kaharuddin
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Perancangan dan Substansi Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara dalam Perspektif Ilmu Perancangan Perundang-Undangan Kaharuddin Kaharuddin; Musya Ar-Rasheed; Emir Abdur Rasyid; Ferdi Raditya Akbar
Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Riau, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan Keempat atas Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara lahir sebagai respons terhadap dinamika kebutuhan hukum nasional, tuntutan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, serta arah kebijakan hilirisasi sumber daya alam. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses perancangan, substansi perubahan, dan tujuan pembentukan undang-undang tersebut berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip perancangan perundang-undangan yang baik. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses legislasi UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2025 telah menempuh tahapan formal dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan, meskipun masih menyisakan tantangan pada aspek partisipasi publik dan harmonisasi regulasi sektoral. Substansi perubahan menekankan penguatan hilirisasi, peningkatan peran perguruan tinggi, serta kepastian hukum dalam tata kelola pertambangan. Secara umum, undang-undang ini mencerminkan upaya negara untuk memperkuat kedaulatan sumber daya alam dan meningkatkan nilai tambah nasional, meskipun efektivitas implementasinya masih perlu evaluasi lebih lanjut.
Reconstruction Draft Testing Regulation Legislation in System Law National : Study Theoretical and Legal to Function Testing in Ensure Supremacy Constitution Wicipto Setiadi; Kaharuddin Kaharuddin; Evi Fitriani; Dimas Yanuarsyah
LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): December : LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, H
Publisher : Badan Penerbit STIEPARI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56910/literacy.v3i3.2552

Abstract

This article discusses the urgency of reconstructing the concept and mechanism of reviewing legislation in the Indonesian national legal system. The main focus is on the dualism of authority between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, weak public participation, and lack of transparency in the judicial review process. Using a normative approach based on Hans Kelsen's hierarchy of norms theory and Satjipto Rahardjo's progressive law, this study highlights the need for a testing system that is not only legal-formal but also substantive and fair. Findings indicate that the separation of authority without coordination leads to inefficiency, inconsistent decisions, and a crisis of legal legitimacy. A comparative study of systems in Germany, South Korea, and the United States serves as the basis for developing an ideal model of judicial review that is centralized, transparent, participatory, and responsive to constitutional values. This research recommends institutional reforms, the development of integrated procedural standards, the digitization of the judicial review system, and the establishment of a unit to oversee the implementation of decisions. As a result, judicial review can function optimally as a corrective tool against unconstitutional regulations and ensure the supremacy of the constitution in Indonesia's constitutional practice.