Ajeng Althafira Alkansa
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Disparitas Ratio Decidendi atas Status Objek Sengketa yang Sama dalam Perkara Perdata dan Pidana Ajeng Althafira Alkansa; Eka Nanda Ravizki
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.926

Abstract

Corruption as an extraordinary crime continues to evolve, both in terms of the number of cases and the modus operandi used. Disparity refers to the differences in sentences imposed in cases with similar characteristics, which may occur due to differences in juridical and non-juridical considerations. Ratio decidendi is the legal reasoning or basis used by judges in making decisions. This study examines the considerations of judges in the civil case in Decision No. 291/PK/Pdt/2011 and the criminal case in Decision No. 128/PID.SUS-TPK/2023/PNSBY regarding the status of land ownership at Danau UNESA Lidah. The research method used is juridical-normative. Both decisions reveal disparities in the judges' considerations.