Tiffany Angelita
Universitas Airlangga

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku di Bawah Umur dalam Kasus Pemerkosaan dan Pembunuhan Clarisa Estefania Simangunsong; Hayyu Nur Anniza; Talitha Ariqa Rahma Irfani; Rahmawati Emma Audrya Agustine; Tiffany Angelita
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 7 (2025): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.1548

Abstract

The era of globalization facilitates access to information, including negative content that can trigger sexual crimes committed by minors, such as rape and murder. Although Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System regulates sanctions, victims' families consider the penalties which are only half of those for adults to be unjust. This normative juridical research employs a literature study with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The findings indicate that criminal responsibility for offenders under the age of 18 cannot be transferred to their parents, and that current sanctions lack a deterrent effect. It is recommended that the Child Protection Law be reviewed and that harsher penalties be applied to perpetrators.
Validity of Land Rights Exchange Conducted by Private Law Subjects and Public Law Subjects Hanum Rahmaniar Helmi; Rahmawati Emma Audrya Agustine; Tiffany Angelita; Krisna Bayumurti
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): November, 2026 (Issue in Progress)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v10i2.49237

Abstract

One of the methods of transferring land rights between private legal subjects and public legal subjects is land rights exchange. Land rights exchange occurs when an owner of a land right exchanges their right with another land right owned by another owner. Land ownership between a private legal subject and a public legal subject is valid if the applicable law is fulfilled. This research aims to investigate the validity terms in land right exchange between private legal subjects and public legal subjects. This research employs a legal normative method, with the approach methods applied being the statute approach and the case approach. As a result of this research, the land right exchange between private legal subjects and public legal subjects is valid as long as it fulfills the material and formal requirements stipulated in Law 5/1960, Government Regulation 24/1997, and other relevant regulations. At the very least, a land rights exchange is valid if the legal subject can exchange the land rights and the exchange process is conducted by the applicable law.