Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Amar Ma'arij
Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Kendala Implementasi Kebijakan Pemekaran Desa di Kabupaten Bima Adi Al Faisal; Taufik Firmanto; Amar Ma'arij
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.1577

Abstract

The formation and expansion of villages in Bima Regency are part of decentralization efforts to improve public services and regional development. However, this policy faces several obstacles, such as unsynchronized regulations between central and local governments and weak institutional capacity. This study employs a normative juridical method through document analysis to examine legal aspects and implementation. The findings reveal that the village expansion process has not been optimal and does not fully adhere to the principles of good governance. Therefore, strengthening local regulations and cross-sectoral coordination is necessary to achieve effective, transparent, and accountable village expansion policies.
Harmonisasi Hukum atas Disparitas Putusan Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Walid Alfian; Erham; Amar Ma'arij
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.1721

Abstract

There is an overlapping authority between the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA) in reviewing laws and regulations. This is evident in the disparity between the Constitutional Court's decisions No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024 and No. 23P/HUM/2024 regarding the age limit for regional head candidates. The Constitutional Court uses the 1945 Constitution as a touchstone, while the Supreme Court uses the Law. This difference creates legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the Judicial Review authority of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court and formulate a harmonization strategy to avoid disparity in decisions. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach to examine the regulation and harmonization of Judicial Review in Indonesia. Harmonization efforts can refer to Law No. 13 of 2022, one of which is through the unification of normative review institutions.
Co-Authors Adi Al Faisal Erham Firmanto, Taufik Walid Alfian