Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Equity of Law and Governance Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan
Rafika Amalia
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pendidikan Nasional
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Akta Penegasan dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Perorangan dalam Kaitannya dengan Doktrin Piercing the Corporate Veil Rafika Amalia; Ni Ketut Elly Sutrisni; Gede Bagus Ari Rama
Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 10 No. 03 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2025.v10.i03.p10

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran notaris dalam membuat akta penegasan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum pada perseroan perorangan dan kaitannya dengan doktrin piercing the corporate veil. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dengan menerapkan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan melakukan analisis konseptual terhadap asas-asas dan doktrin hukum. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa peran notaris melalui akta penegasan notaris dapat membantu melengkapi dokumen pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Perorangan. Meskipun tidak wajib, dokumen ini memberikan kepastian hukum dan legitimasi tambahan. Akta ini dapat mempermudah proses bisnis, seperti pembukaan rekening bank, serta memperkuat posisi hukum perusahaan jika terjadi sengketa. Akta penegasan juga berfungsi sebagai alat bukti yang kuat untuk membuktikan kepatuhan terhadap formalitas korporasi, yang merupakan elemen penting dalam pertahanan terhadap doktrin piercing the corporate veil.
Protecting Well-Known Marks Related to Territorial Principle: From Substantive Similarity to the Distinctiveness Theory Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan; Putu Samsithawrati; I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Rafika Amalia
Journal Equity of Law and Governance Vol. 6 No. 2
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/elg.6.2.10740.33-41

Abstract

Well-known marks are vulnerable to violations, including in Indonesia. Registered trademark disputes often occur between well-known and local mark owners regarding substantive similarities with well-known marks. Ironically, the dominant dispute resolution protects local marks with the rationality of mark protection based on Territorial Principles. The purpose of this study is to clarify how well-known marks are protected related to the exception applying the Territorial Principle to substantively similar marks and to examine the advantages of the Distinctiveness Theory for more legal certainty. The study used a normative legal research method. Study reveals that the Territorial Principle applies to mark protection through Article 6 of the Paris Convention, Article 15 of TRIPs, Article 3 of Indonesian Law No.20/2016 on Mark and Geographical Indication. Protection of Well-Known Marks is excluded from the Territorial Principle as agreed in 1925 by member countries of the Paris Convention. The exception arrangements are through Article 6bis of the Paris Convention, Article 16 of the TRIPs Agreement, and Article 21 of Law No.20/2016. Marks that are substantively similar with similar elements in visuals, phonetics, and concepts are important for mark examiners, law enforcers, and the public to understand. Understanding the mark distinctiveness theory from the weakest to the strongest, namely: Generic, Descriptive, Suggestive, Fanciful, and Arbitrary as an alternative solution for advantages in mark registration. That will also minimize mark disputes. Good faith in the mark registration is referring to uniqueness theory, it is able to differentiate items or services.
Co-Authors Gede Bagus Ari Rama I Gede Agus Kurniawan Ni Ketut Elly Sutrisni Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan Putu Samsithawrati