Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Membedah Isu Pelanggaran HAM di Indonesia: Studi Kasus dan Respons Hukum terhadap Siklus Pelanggaran Sistematis Komala, ⁠Ida; Sangkala, Robert; Ari Wibowo, Satria; Roif, Roif; Asari, Ali; Adi Candra, Firman
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10284

Abstract

This article analyzes human rights violations in Indonesia, focusing on the systematic cycle of violations involving state apparatus and government policies. Through in-depth analysis of recent case studies such as the repression of protesters, the Kanjuruhan tragedy, conflicts in Papua, and criminalization via UU ITE, the article critically examines legal responses within Indonesia's positive law framework. Legal sources reviewed include the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945), Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights, Law No. 26 of 2000 on Human Rights Courts, Law No. 19 of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE), the Criminal Code (KUHP), Law No. 2 of 2002 on Polri, Law No. 34 of 2004 on TNI, and various related Government Regulations (PP) and Presidential Decrees (Keppres). Findings indicate that despite legislative efforts and the establishment of institutions like Komnas HAM, implementation remains weak due to impunity, politicization, lack of accountability, and structural resistance to change. This condition perpetuates a cycle of violations that erodes public trust and hinders democratic consolidation. This study aims to identify the root causes of this cycle and provide comprehensive recommendations for strengthening law enforcement, including structural reforms, enhanced institutional capacity, and the promotion of a human rights culture across all government levels and society. This analysis is relevant for policymakers, legal academics, human rights activists, and the broader Indonesian public in their efforts to achieve substantive justice and comprehensive human rights protection.
Melawan Otoritarianisme Digital di Indonesia: Urgensi Reformasi Hukum dan Perlindungan Hak Digital dalam Era Represi 2025 Abi, Kemal; Ikbal, Ikbal; Alif, Sayyid; Jueni, Jueni; Endarto, Dwi Wahyu; Adi Candra, Firman
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10287

Abstract

This research examines the escalating phenomenon of digital authoritarianism in Indonesia in 2025, characterized by increased digital repression and human rights violations in cyberspace. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, this article analyzes trends in the use of regulations such as the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) as a tool for repression, restrictions on freedom of expression, data surveillance, and the criminalization of activists and journalists. Significant impacts on civil and political liberties, as well as the vulnerability of minority groups, women, and children, are key highlights. The study emphasizes the urgency of legal reform, including the harmonization of regulations with international human rights principles such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the importance of public participation in legislation. Furthermore, this article offers digital rights protection strategies involving the role of civil society, digital literacy education, multi-stakeholder collaboration, and policy advocacy to counter digital authoritarianism for a just democracy. The research also explores concrete case studies, such as Amnesty International's report on "electoral authoritarianism" in Indonesia and 108 digital rights violations against children by TAUD, and proposes reform models like amending rubber articles in the ITE Law and establishing a Digital Rights Commission. Thus, this study contributes to the discourse on progressive legal research to strengthen juridical argumentation foundations amid the dynamics of digital norms and facts.