Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

DAMPAK KERJA LEMBUR SUAMI PADA PEMENUHAN NAFKAH BATIN ISTRI MASYARAKAT BATU LAYAR: ANALISIS HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM BERBASIS STUDI KASUS Cahyadi, Goliz; Husaini, Akhmad
USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/vpd4yv61

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of husbands’ overtime work on the fulfillment of wives’ emotional and spiritual needs (nafkah batin) from the perspective of Islamic family law, with a case study in Batu Layar Village, West Lombok Regency. The social dynamics in this tourism-based community show that the high frequency of overtime work affects the emotional harmony of families. Using a qualitative descriptive method, data were collected through field observation and in-depth interviews with seven respondents. The findings reveal that overtime work has a dual effect: it strengthens the family’s economic stability but reduces emotional attention, communication, and marital intimacy. From the standpoint of Islamic law, this situation constitutes taqsir (relative neglect) when the husband fails to maintain a balance between material and spiritual obligations, in accordance with the principle of mu‘āsyarah bil ma‘ruf (living together in kindness) in QS. An-Nisa’: 19. Indonesian positive law, through Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law, likewise obliges husbands to fulfill both material and spiritual needs proportionally. This research recommends religious and communicative solutions grounded in spiritual awareness to preserve marital harmony amid modern economic pressures
Vasectomy as Social Assistance Policy Discourse: A Normative Juridical Analysis from Ibn ʿUthaymīn’s Fatwa Husaini, Akhmad; Mas'ud, Marwan; Cahyadi, Goliz; Aji Pratama, Sylvano Wijaya
JURNAL AT-TURAS Vol 13, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/at-turas.v13i1.13486

Abstract

This research examines the normative and ethical implications of the West Java Governor’s statement proposing vasectomy as a prerequisite for prioritizing social assistance, by addressing the central question of whether such policy discourse constitutes a violation of maqāṣid al-syarīʿah and generates legal–ethical conflicts within Islamic and national legal frameworks. Employing a qualitative approach with library-based research methodology, this study analyzes secondary data through descriptive and content analysis. The analytical framework is grounded in maqāṣid al-syarīʿah theory, while conclusions are drawn using a deductive reasoning approach. The findings demonstrate that conditioning social assistance on vasectomy represents a normative inconsistency that contradicts the principle of preserving progeny (ḥifẓ al-nasl), as articulated in Ibn al-ʿUthaymīn’s fatwas, which prohibit permanent sterilization except in cases of medical necessity. Furthermore, the study identifies significant legal and ethical tensions, including the erosion of religious commitment, distortion of the concept of tawakkul, and violations of bodily autonomy and reproductive rights as protected under national law and human rights norms. The research concludes that such policy discourse risks producing structural injustice against economically marginalized groups. As an alternative, this study proposes rights-based and maqāṣid-oriented solutions, including sustainable economic empowerment programs, comprehensive reproductive health education, voluntary use of non-permanent contraception, and the reinforcement of a fair, non-discriminatory social security system to achieve public welfare without compromising fundamental religious values and human rights.