Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Niasti, Sinta
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Paradigma Positivistik, Konstruktivistik, dan Pragmatik dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Priatna, Tedi; Fauzi, Bayu Bambang Nur; Fitri, Amilia; Suryani, Azka Izzati; Lestari, Maryam Dwi; Niasti, Sinta
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 11 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17919722

Abstract

This article examines three main paradigms in educational research: positivist, constructivist, and pragmatic, with a focus on their ontological, epistemological, and methodological foundations. Using a conceptual study approach, this review maps the characteristics, strengths, and limitations of each paradigm and their relevance in improving the quality of educational research. The positivist paradigm emphasizes objectivity and a quantitative approach to uncover cause-and-effect relationships. The constructivist paradigm focuses on gaining deep understanding of meaning and experience through flexible qualitative methods. Meanwhile, the pragmatic paradigm prioritizes practical usefulness through adaptive mixed methods. The study finds that selecting the appropriate paradigm, aligned with the research objectives, can produce valid, relevant findings that impact educational development. This review provides guidance for researchers to design studies that are reflective and responsive to field needs.
Paradigma Positivistik, Konstruktivistik, dan Pragmatik dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Fitri, Amilia; Suryani, Azka Izzati; Lestari, Maryam Dwi; Niasti, Sinta
Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 5 No 4 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 4, 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28926/jpip.v5i4.2293

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji tiga paradigma utama dalam penelitian pendidikan, yaitu positivistik, konstruktivistik, dan pragmatik, dengan fokus pada landasan ontologis, epistemologis, dan metodologis masing-masing. Menggunakan pendekatan studi konseptual, kajian ini memetakan karakteristik, kelebihan, serta keterbatasan setiap paradigma dan relevansinya dalam meningkatkan kualitas penelitian pendidikan. Paradigma positivistik menekankan objektivitas dan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk menemukan hukum sebab-akibat. Paradigma konstruktivistik berorientasi pada pemahaman mendalam makna dan pengalaman melalui metode kualitatif yang fleksibel. Sementara itu, paradigma pragmatik mengutamakan kebermanfaatan praktis dengan metode campuran yang adaptif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa pemilihan paradigma yang tepat, disesuaikan dengan tujuan penelitian, dapat menghasilkan temuan yang valid, relevan, dan berdampak pada pengembangan pendidikan. Kajian ini memberikan panduan bagi peneliti untuk merancang penelitian yang reflektif dan responsif terhadap kebutuhan lapangan
Co-Authors Fauzi, Bayu Bambang Nur Fitri, Amilia Lestari, Maryam Dwi Suryani, Azka Izzati Tedi Priatna