Toisuta, Usman Abdul Jihad
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Mengungkap Jerat Hukum Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Analisis Kritis UU No. 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Najmudin, Nandang; Adinda, Nendena Rizqi; Toisuta, Usman Abdul Jihad; Huda, Tamimil
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v3i4.1530

Abstract

This study aims to critically and legally analyze the concept of criminal liability for perpetrators of sexual violence and identify the advantages and challenges of implementing Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Criminal Acts of Sexual Violence (TPKS Law). The background to the problem is driven by the failure of previous regulations (the Criminal Code) to cover the various modes of operation of TPKS and provide comprehensive protection for victims. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Primary legal materials (TPKS Law) and secondary materials (criminal law doctrine and scientific journals) were analyzed qualitatively and descriptively to examine the formulation of offenses, the punishment system, and the victim-centered approach philosophy contained therein. The results of the study show that the TPKS Law has become a significant milestone in criminal law reform through the expansion of strafbaarfeit. This law has successfully closed the criminalization gap by criminalizing eight new types of TPKS, including Non-Physical Sexual Harassment and Electronic-Based Sexual Violence (KSBE), whose definitions emphasize the absence of consent and power relations. In addition, the TPKS Law expands the subjects of law that can be held accountable to include corporations and introduces progressive additional penalties, such as the obligation of restitution and disclosure of the perpetrator's identity, as well as strictly limiting the use of restorative justice mechanisms in serious cases. Although innovative, the effectiveness of the legal provisions in the TPKS Law still faces serious implementation challenges, particularly regarding the issue of proving non-physical/electronic crimes and the gap between legal certainty of punishment and the fulfillment of restorative justice for victims. Therefore, it is recommended that the government immediately strengthen the technical readiness of law enforcement officials and allocate adequate resources for integrated service infrastructure and restitution enforcement mechanisms at the regional level to ensure the successful implementation of a victim-centered legal paradigm.
Aspek Ontologi, Epistimologi dan Aksiologi Gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis Toisuta, Usman Abdul Jihad; Saepullah, Usep
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora (In Press)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i2.1759

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis Gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis (Critical Legal Studies) melalui kajian aspek ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi sebagai kerangka filsafat hukum yang mengkritisi dominasi paradigma positivisme hukum dalam sistem hukum modern. Penelitian ini berangkat dari asumsi bahwa hukum kerap dipahami sebagai sistem normatif yang netral, objektif, dan otonom, sementara dalam praktiknya hukum tidak dapat dilepaskan dari relasi sosial, politik, dan kekuasaan. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan filsafat hukum dan kritis, serta pendekatan konseptual dan historis, artikel ini mengkaji gagasan utama Studi Hukum Kritis dan relevansinya dalam konteks Indonesia. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa secara ontologis, Studi Hukum Kritis memandang hukum sebagai konstruksi sosial dan politik yang bersifat historis dan kontingen. Secara epistemologis, pengetahuan hukum dipahami sebagai produk relasi kekuasaan yang tidak bebas nilai, sehingga klaim objektivitas dan kepastian hukum perlu dibaca secara kritis melalui metode dekonstruksi dan kritik ideologi. Dari sisi aksiologis, Studi Hukum Kritis memiliki orientasi emansipatoris dengan menempatkan keadilan substantif dan pembebasan kelompok marjinal sebagai tujuan utama hukum. Dalam konteks Indonesia, pendekatan ini relevan untuk mengkritisi praktik penegakan hukum yang masih dipengaruhi ketimpangan struktural serta mendorong reformasi hukum yang lebih responsif terhadap keadilan sosial. Artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya penguatan pendekatan kritis dalam pendidikan dan praktik hukum guna mewujudkan sistem hukum yang demokratis dan berkeadilan.