Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS) Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal
Ario Anggoro
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EVALUATION OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND ETHICAL THEORY IN MANAGERIAL PRACTICE GARUDA INDONESIA CASE STUDY 2019 Dito Aditya Darma Nst; Diana Trisisca; Chandra Prayoga; Siti Rana Aqilah; Fahradilla Aulia; Ario Anggoro; Heru Syahputra
International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): December
Publisher : CV. Radja Publika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijebas.v5i6.4808

Abstract

Professional ethics is crucial for the workplace, especially for managers who play a strategic role in decision-making and organizational policies. In analyzing professional ethics for decision-making purposes, this article focuses on professional ethics theories, professional ethics principles, and a case study at PT. Garuda Indonesia. The case study discussed includes the manipulation of the 2018 financial statements related to the implementation of ethics and internal management awareness. The analysis used in this article is utilitarianism, deontology, and welfare ethics, where PT. Garuda Indonesia's management failed to meet applicable moral standards. The findings of this study indicate that integrity, responsibility, and organizational culture are important components that must be upheld in business.
Power and Resources in Negotiation: How Power Balance Influences Negotiation Outcomes Putri Estefania; Ario Anggoro; Diaz Fadilla; Anita A; Alex Ferguson Ginting
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17636291

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between power, resources, and power balance in negotiation from a humanistic perspective, which views negotiation as an interpersonal interaction process that upholds dignity, fairness, and relational ethics. Power in negotiation emerges from the strategic use of resources such as information, time, alternatives (BATNA), and formal position, which dynamically interact to shape a negotiator’s capacity to influence. Power imbalances affect communication, decision-making, strategies employed, and the psychological conditions of the parties involved. Dominant parties tend to control the negotiation process, while weaker parties often experience emotional pressure and strategic limitations, increasing the risk of domination and exploitation. Negotiation outcomes typically favor the stronger side, yet such outcomes may threaten the sustainability of long-term relationships. Mitigation strategies include strengthening BATNA, managing information, using objective standards, and building coalitions. This study highlights that negotiation effectiveness and relationship sustainability depend on the ethical and humane application of power.
Co-Authors Alex Ferguson Ginting Anita A Chandra Prayoga Diana Trisisca Diaz Fadilla Dito Aditya Darma Nst Fahradilla Aulia Heru Syahputra Putri Estefania Siti Rana Aqilah