Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia IJEBD (International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development)
Permatasari, Corina
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan kontrak baku dalam pelaksanaan proyek pemerintah : Analisis Hukum Perdata Permatasari, Corina
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v11i1.62890

Abstract

Kontrak standar dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah dimaksudkan untuk berfungsi sebagai alat utama yang memastikan konsistensi, efisiensi, dan kepatuhan terhadap ketentuan publik di setiap fase pelaksanaan proyek. Namun, penerapan praktik ini seringkali menciptakan ketegangan antara prinsip kebebasan berkontrak yang diatur dalam Pasal 1338 KUH Perdata dan batasan normatif yang ditetapkan oleh regulasi pengadaan. Artikel ini menganalisis posisi kontrak standar dalam proyek pemerintah dari sudut pandang normatif, termasuk asal-usul dan fungsi kontrak tersebut, potensi munculnya klausula yang tidak adil—yang cenderung lebih merugikan penyedia jasa dibandingkan dengan pengguna jasa—serta implikasinya terhadap keabsahan dan keadilan kontraktual. Penelitian ini menggunakan kajian hukum perdata serta aturan pengadaan terbaru, termasuk perubahan terbaru dalam regulasi pengadaan pemerintah, untuk mengeksplorasi bagaimana batasan kebebasan berkontrak diterapkan dalam konteks administrasi publik. Temuan awal menunjukkan bahwa meskipun kontrak standar mendukung tujuan administratif dan fiskal, diperlukan pengawasan substansial untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara hak dan kewajiban agar klausula yang tidak adil tidak merusak prinsip kepatutan dan ketertiban umum. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan mekanisme untuk meningkatkan transparansi serta evaluasi atas klausula baku sebagai cara untuk menyeimbangkan efisiensi pemerintah dengan keadilan kontraktual sesuai dengan hukum perdata Indonesia.
Application of the Principles of Good Faith and Pacta Sunt Servanda in Unequal Construction Contracts: A Case Study of B2B Developer–Contractor Setijanto, Augustinus; Permatasari, Corina; Artahana, Nana; Hadamean, Join; Alam, Peto Syamsul; Koeswanto, Arief; Anggoro, Prastiwo; Prihatinah, Tri Lisiani
IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development) Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Jan - Feb 2026
Publisher : LPPM of NAROTAMA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29138/ijebd.v9i1.3494

Abstract

The legal relationship between developers and contractors in business-to-business (B2B) construction contracts in Indonesia often shows a significant imbalance of power. Although formally the contract is made based on the principle of freedom of contract, substantively the legal relationship often deviates from the principles of fairness and balance that form the basis of contract law. This paper examines the application of two fundamental principles in contract law, namely good faith and pacta sunt servanda, which means that every agreement made legally is binding on the parties who made it (Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code) in the practice of biased construction contracts, particularly when developers modify FIDIC standard contracts by removing or limiting clauses that are detrimental to their interests, such as the Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (DAAB), the right to an extension of time (EoT), and the right to suspend payment. This study uses a normative-juridical approach with case and comparative analysis methods, examining actual practices between developers and contractors experiencing delays, variation orders, and payment delays. The results of the analysis show that the removal of these protective mechanisms not only creates the potential for structural default but also constitutes a violation of the principle of good faith in the implementation of contracts as stipulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code. Meanwhile, the pacta sunt servanda principle cannot be applied absolutely if the substance of the contract contains a striking imbalance and violates propriety (Article 1339 of the Civil Code). This paper offers an update in the form of a reinterpretation of the principle of good faith as a corrective instrument against exploitative clauses, as well as a proposal for the establishment of a national DAAB institution with proportional costs to uphold contractual justice. Thus, the application of contract law in construction contracts must be directed towards substantive balance and a fair relational relationship between developers and contractors, so that national development objectives can be achieved without causing protracted disputes.
Co-Authors Alam, Peto Syamsul Anggoro, Prastiwo Artahana, Nana Hadamean, Join Koeswanto, Arief Setijanto, Augustinus Tri Lisiani Prihatinah