Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Asian Digital Governance Problems
Fitriani, Laras
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : asian digital governance problems

 1 
Cybersecurity and Digital Sovereignty: An Analysis of National Data Governance Capacity in the Global Platform Era: A Literature Review Fitriani, Laras
Asian Digital Governance Problems Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Asian Digital Governance Problems
Publisher : Asian Digital Governance Problems

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71435/685954

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines national data governance capacity in the context of cybersecurity and digital sovereignty across Indonesia, the European Union, China, and India during 2010–2024. The research aims to identify how institutional coordination, regulatory coherence, enforcement effectiveness, technological autonomy, and public trust shape digital sovereignty within the global platform era. Subjects and Methods: This study employed a qualitative systematic literature review combined with critical interpretive synthesis. Data were collected from 76 academic articles, cybersecurity reports, institutional publications, and regulatory documents identified through a PRISMA-based selection process. The analysis applied thematic coding, repeated reading, conceptual integration, and comparative governance analysis to examine recurring governance patterns and institutional contradictions. Results: The findings reveal that digital sovereignty operates as a multidimensional governance capacity shaped by institutional integration, cybersecurity readiness, technological infrastructure, and governance legitimacy. The European Union demonstrates strong regulatory coherence, China exhibits centralized enforcement and technological autonomy, India reflects transitional governance adaptation, while Indonesia faces governance fragmentation, technological dependency, and weak cybersecurity preparedness. Conclusions: Effective digital sovereignty requires integrated governance systems, sustainable technological investment, institutional coordination, and long-term public trust in digital governance.
Co-Authors Fitrianti, Dini