Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

STRATEGI BERTAHAN HIDUP DAN HUKUM ISLAM: ANALISIS TERHADAP NIAT ANTARA IBADAH PUASA DAN KETERPAKSAAN KARENA KEMISKINAN Nabila Nur Aini; Citra Azra Amalia; Shelomitha Azalia Widyaningrum; Arie Sukanti Siagian; Baidhowi Baidhowi
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 2 No. 6 (2025): Desember : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu (JIMI)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/hqph7b37

Abstract

Poverty, which arises as a result of unequal development, has become a serious issue for many communities. Economic hardship often compels individuals to justify any means necessary to achieve their goals, even at the cost of violating moral values. This condition not only triggers criminal behavior but also contributes to the decline of morality, as people may neglect social and religious norms in order to survive. As a multidimensional problem, poverty generates various social issues. Under economic pressure, individuals working as laborers, small traders, or low-income employees are sometimes driven to deviant acts such as theft, robbery, or even prostitution. Such circumstances also influence the practice of religious duties, as some people tend to neglect religious and moral obligations in order to fulfill their basic needs. This study aims to examine the relationship between fasting as a religious obligation and the sense of compulsion brought about by economic difficulties. Miles & Huberman identify the main causes of poverty as low levels of education, weak work ethic, and limited employment opportunities. Consequently, religious practices such as prayer, fasting, and other Islamic activities are often performed inconsistently. From the perspective of Islamic law, this phenomenon reflects a shift in intention: acts of worship that should be based on sincerity may instead be carried out under compulsion due to economic pressure. Thus, poverty fosters survival strategies that weaken the quality of religious observance and create a dilemma between genuine devotion and compulsion in performing fasting
Imunitas Advokat dan Kemanfaatan Hukum: Studi Kasus Potensi Kriminalisasi Profesi dalam Perkara Hendra Sianipar Citra Azra Amalia; Rafif Gadi Maulana; Shelomita Azalia Widiyaningrum; Arie Sukanti Siagian; Baidhowi Baidhowi
Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei: Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/desentralisasi.v3i2.1640

Abstract

The legal profession plays a vital role in the judicial system to ensure the principle of equality before the law as well as fair and accountable legal proceedings. In accordance with Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates, an advocate is an autonomous, independent, and accountable legal professional who is granted immunity as stipulated in Articles 14, 15, and 16, which provide protection from civil and criminal claims when acting in good faith while performing their duties. However, in practice, the scope of this immunity often leads to differing interpretations, particularly regarding the parameters of “good faith” and the scope of “professional duties,” which can result in the criminalization of lawyers. This is evident in the case of Hendra Sianipar, where a lawyer’s actions in exercising legal authority were instead subject to criminal prosecution. This study aims to examine the limits of attorney immunity and explore the potential for criminalization of this profession using a normative legal approach combined with a legal utility analysis. The findings of this study indicate that attorney immunity is not absolute but is limited by good faith, compliance with the law, and professional ethics, thus requiring clearer and more balanced clarification of these limits.