Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PAEDAGOGIE
Zanki, Amir Basari
Unknown Affiliation
Education Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Paradigma Keilmuan Modern: Sintesis Induktivisme Bacon, Logika Kausal Mill, dan Positivisme Comte Indriani, Indriani; Wiyanto, Sandi; Widia, Widia; Nurhayati, Nurhayati; Ardiansyah, Andi; Zanki, Amir Basari
Paedagogie Vol 21 No 1 (2026): (Issue in progress)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/paedagogie.v21i1.15548

Abstract

The development of modern scientific methodology reveals a growing tendency toward partial approaches that separate data exploration, causal analysis, and empirical verification, which may lead to epistemological reductionism in research practices. This study aims to reconstruct the scientific paradigm through a synthesis of Francis Bacon’s inductivism, John Stuart Mill’s causal logic, and Auguste Comte’s positivism as an integrative methodological framework. This research employs a library research method by examining primary works of Bacon, Mill, and Comte, as well as relevant journal articles published within the last five years. Data analysis is conducted using a comparative approach to assess the functions, strengths, and limitations of each paradigm. The findings indicate that Bacon’s inductivism plays a crucial role in the exploratory stage and empirical pattern identification, Mill’s causal logic functions as an inferential mechanism for explaining cause– effect relationships, and Comte’s positivism contributes to verification and scientific legitimacy. The discussion affirms that the integration of these three approaches forms a sequential methodological framework that is more adaptive to the complexity of contemporary research. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of methodological synthesis as a foundation for the development of modern epistemology and as a reference for constructing comprehensive and reflective interdisciplinary research frameworks.
Peran Heuristik dalam Mengembangkan Kerangka Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern Zanki, Amir Basari; Fahrul, Moh; Pahude, Jupriadi J.; Thahir, Lukman S; Nurhayati, Nurhayati; Zanki, Harits Azmi; Indriani, Indriani
Paedagogie Vol 21 No 1 (2026): (Issue in progress)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/paedagogie.v21i1.15552

Abstract

This study examines the role of heuristics in developing the framework of modern scientific knowledge through a library research method utilizing twenty journal articles published within the last decade. The central question addressed concerns how heuristics function as both cognitive and methodological mechanisms shaping reasoning patterns, theory construction, and scientific problem-solving. This study employs a library research approach by systematically reviewing relevant scientific articles through structured processes of searching, screening, and examining indexed academic literature. The data were analyzed using content analysis and thematic synthesis to identify key concepts, thematic trends, and the relationships among arguments presented across the selected studies. The findings reveal that heuristics operate not merely as simplification strategies but as epistemological foundations enabling the emergence of new conceptual models, theoretical revisions, and scientific innovation. Principles such as analogy, abstraction, concept mapping, and pattern-based reasoning contribute significantly to research efficiency and strengthen the validity of scientific inference. The study concludes that the modern scientific knowledge framework is inherently adaptive and evolves through continuous heuristic processes. Its implications include reinforcing the theoretical basis of modern epistemology, enhancing heuristic integration within methodological design, and emphasizing the need to incorporate heuristic competencies in education and future research development.
Co-Authors Andi Ardiansyah Fahrul, Moh Indriani Indriani Nurhayati Nurhayati Pahude, Jupriadi J. Thahir, Lukman S Widia, Widia Wiyanto, Sandi Zanki, Harits Azmi