Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal REKAYASA DAN INOVASI TEKNIK SIPIL
Prio, Prio
Unknown Affiliation
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Environmental Science Transportation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS RAB STRUKTUR BETON GEDUNG TAMAN BUDAYA MENGGUNAKAN REVIT Prio, Prio; Putra, Agung Dwi; Shulhan, M. Afif; Galuh, Dimas Langga Candra
RENOVASI : Rekayasa Dan Inovasi Teknik Sipil Vol 10 No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineer, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/renovasi.v10i2.21192

Abstract

Along with the development of technology and various technological advancements in the construction sector, the use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology has increased, as some budget planning methods still use conventional/analytical methods. This study was conducted to determine the accuracy of the BIM and analytical methods in preparing the Cost Budget Plan (RAB) by comparing the RABs of both methods. The results obtained from the comparison of concrete and reinforcement volume requirements using the analytical method were higher than those using the BIM (Building Information Modeling) method, with differences of 6,430 m3 (1.16%) and 2,293.102 kg (2.63%), respectively. The difference in concrete and reinforcement costs between the BIM (Building Information Modeling) method and the analytical method was higher, at Rp 8,065,990.45 and Rp 114,601,701.09, respectively, with a concrete cost ratio of 1.11% and reinforcement cost of 1.94%. The total Cost Budget Plan (RAB) using the analytical method was 0.71% higher by Rp 56,846,733.08 than the Building Information Modeling (BIM) method, with a total Cost Budget Plan (RAB) of only Rp 7,925,716,320.58 and a total Cost Budget Plan (RAB) using the analytical method of Rp 7,982,563,053.
Co-Authors Galuh, Dimas Langga Candra M. Afif Shulhan Putra, Agung Dwi