Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Kearifan Lokal Dalam Penanggulanganan Bencana Gempa Bumi Dan Sistem Pewarisannya di Pulau Lombok Nusa Tenggara Barat: Local Wisdom in Earthquake Disaster Management and its Legacy System in Lombok Island, West Nusa Tenggara Mohamad Zaki Taufik; Luh Putu Vera Astri Pujayanti
Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Suara Khatulistiwa Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Kebijakan Pelayanan Pemerintahan
Publisher : Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33701/jipsk.v9i2.4908

Disasters can destroy but also provide opportunities and triggers to rise and be resilient. Active-preventive efforts are needed to minimize the impact of disasters through reactivating local knowledge and developing its inheritance system as a momentum for community resilience in facing crises. This study aims to determine the local wisdom that can reduce the impact of earthquake disasters both in the pre-, during and post-earthquake disasters and their inheritance systems on Lombok Island. Local wisdom in the pre-disaster cycle in disaster mitigation activities through the physical form of buildings and settlement patterns, myths and traditional ceremonies and disaster beliefs. In disaster preparedness, organizing reserves for food insecurity in barn buildings. In disaster early warning through reading natural signs and notification of events through local languages and beating objects that make sounds. Local wisdom in the cycle when a disaster occurs in disaster response through the placement of evacuation and victim assistance in the center of the berugak multifunctional building and disaster relief activities through besiru as the spirit and value of community cooperation. Local wisdom in the post-disaster cycle in disaster recovery through the determination and willingness of the community to rise to normal conditions by working hard, patiently and sincerely. Local wisdom in rehabilitation activities normalizes life through trauma healing with traditional games. The development of modernization, globalization and needs causes the existence of local wisdom to depend on the level of functionality and inheritance efforts from social communities on Lombok Island. Most of the ways of inheriting local wisdom in the context of earthquake disaster management are carried out through the local wisdom inheritance system of vertical transmission inheritance.

Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Asimetris: Studi Konstitusional terhadap Daerah Khusus, Daerah Istimewa, dan Otorita IKN Luh Putu Vera Astri Pujayanti; Muhammad Suhardi
Jurnal Perlindungan Masyarakat: Bestuur Praesidium Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : IPDN Kampus NTB

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This study aims to analyze the construction of popular sovereignty in asymmetric regional head selection and to compare local democracy models in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Special Region of Jakarta, Aceh, Papua, and the Nusantara Capital Authority. This research uses a qualitative method with normative juridical research. The approaches applied include statutory, conceptual, comparative, and normative case approaches. The data consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through library research. The analysis is conducted qualitatively and prescriptively through legal interpretation and legal reasoning. The findings show that popular sovereignty in asymmetric local government is not always expressed through direct elections. Yogyakarta represents a historical-cultural privilege model through the appointment of the governor and vice governor. Jakarta maintains direct elections at the provincial level but limits direct elections at the city and regency administrative levels. Aceh reflects a special autonomy model based on political reconciliation and local political parties. Papua demonstrates a special autonomy model based on the cultural representation of Indigenous Papuans. The Nusantara Capital Authority represents the most problematic model because its head is appointed by the President. This study proposes constitutional parameters for assessing asymmetric local democracy, namely constitutional legitimacy, meaningful public participation, citizen representation, accountability of local government leaders, and protection of the substance of local democracy. The findings affirm that regional asymmetry may be constitutionally justified as long as it does not eliminate public control over local governance.

Constitutionality of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Government Administrative Decision-Making: An Analysis of the Principle of Due Process of Law in Indonesia Luh Putu Vera Astri Pujayanti
International Journal of Scientific Research Vol. 2 No. 03 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Hisnul Muslim Lombok

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62894/fqp2nc41

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into public administration has fundamentally transformed governmental decision-making processes by enhancing efficiency, consistency, and the speed of public service delivery. However, the increasing reliance on algorithmic systems in administrative governance raises significant constitutional concerns, particularly in relation to transparency, accountability, procedural fairness, and the protection of citizens’ fundamental rights. This study aims to examine the constitutionality of AI-assisted administrative decision-making in Indonesia through the lens of the principle of due process of law. The research employs a qualitative legal research method with a normative-juridical approach. It focuses on constitutional principles, administrative law doctrines, statutory frameworks, and comparative legal developments concerning automated decision-making in the public sector. Data are collected through an extensive doctrinal analysis of constitutional provisions, legislation, judicial decisions, scholarly literature, and relevant policy documents addressing artificial intelligence and digital governance. The findings indicate that while AI-based systems provide substantial administrative benefits, their implementation introduces constitutional risks such as algorithmic opacity, limited explainability, potential discriminatory outputs, and weakened accountability mechanisms. These issues directly affect the realization of procedural justice, legal certainty, equality before the law, and access to effective legal remedies. The study further identifies that Indonesia’s current legal framework has not yet developed comprehensive constitutional safeguards specifically regulating the use of AI in administrative decision-making. As a key contribution, this study proposes a constitutional compliance framework consisting of six interrelated principles: legality, transparency, explainability, human oversight, accountability, and effective remedy. This framework is intended to serve as a normative benchmark for evaluating the constitutional legitimacy of AI deployment in public administration and to ensure that technological advancement remains aligned with the rule of law, democratic governance, and the protection of fundamental rights.

Judicialization of Politics in Indonesian Electoral Law Reform: An Analysis of the Constitutional Court’s Role in Shaping the Direction of Constitutional Policy Luh Putu Vera Astri Pujayanti
International Journal of Scientific Research Vol. 3 No. 01 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Hisnul Muslim Lombok

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62894/24kc8h47

This study aims to analyse the judicialization of politics in Indonesian electoral law reform, with a specific focus on the role of the Constitutional Court in shaping the direction of constitutional policy. The issue is significant because electoral law reform in Indonesia is increasingly determined not only through legislative processes, but also through constitutional adjudication on politically sensitive issues such as electoral thresholds, candidacy requirements, simultaneous elections, ballot design, and electoral disputes. This study uses a qualitative legal research method with a normative-juridical approach. It applies statutory, case, conceptual, and historical approaches by examining the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, electoral laws, Constitutional Court decisions, electoral regulations, and recent scholarly literature on judicialization of politics, electoral justice, constitutional democracy, and separation of powers. The findings show that the Constitutional Court has developed from a constitutional adjudicator into a constitutional policy shaper in electoral reform. Its decisions have influenced the structure of political competition, legislative discretion, electoral fairness, and the institutional direction of democratic governance. Judicialization may strengthen constitutional democracy when it protects political rights and corrects unfair electoral rules. Yet it may also create risks when judicial intervention expands into policy-making, generates legal uncertainty, or weakens democratic deliberation. This study contributes by offering a balanced framework that distinguishes constructive judicialization from problematic judicialization in Indonesian electoral law reform.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search