Taqyuddin Kadir
Universitas Jayabaya

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Corporate Compliance with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance): Perspectives on Business Law and Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Herry m polontoh; Taqyuddin Kadir
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025): Ipso Jure - June
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/25czhf80

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles into Indonesia's business law framework in response to global demands for sustainable corporate practices. Through a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes the disharmony of national regulations, especially between Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, and sectoral regulations from the OJK such as POJK No. 51/POJK.03/2017. The results of the study show that although ESG principles are beginning to be accommodated in some legal instruments, they are still administrative, sectoral, and do not have a strong binding force judicially. This has an impact on weak corporate accountability in carrying out environmental and social responsibility as part of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). This research emphasizes the importance of ESG codification as a positive legal norm that can be enforced through the supervision and accountability mechanism of the board of directors. Comparative studies with practices in the European Union and OECD show that the successful implementation of ESG is highly dependent on the existence of prescriptive norms and integrated monitoring systems. Therefore, the reformulation of Indonesian corporate law is crucial to realize inclusive, sustainable, and accountable business governance
Viral Justice: The Influence of Social Media Culture on the Independence of Law Enforcement Henny Saida Flora; Taqyuddin Kadir
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 12 (2026): Ipso Jure - January
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/fk6r6q02

Abstract

Social media culture has transformed the digital public sphere and significantly influenced law enforcement practices in Indonesia. The phenomenon of viral justice demonstrates how legal processes are increasingly exposed to public opinion pressure generated through online virality, functioning as a form of non-formal intervention beyond established legal mechanisms. This study aims to examine the impact of social media culture on the independence of law enforcement and its normative implications for the rule of law and due process of law. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that normative ambiguity within existing regulations has resulted in the absence of clear boundaries between digital freedom of expression and the protection of fair judicial processes. Consequently, law enforcement officials face reputational pressures that may shift decision-making from legal reasoning toward popularity-based responsiveness. This condition threatens judicial independence, undermines legal certainty, and creates unequal treatment between viral and non-viral cases. The study underscores the urgent need for explicit legal norms and strengthened institutional ethics to maintain a balance between digital freedoms and the integrity of the rule of law in the social media era.
Artificial Intelligence Legal Subjects? A Critical Analysis of the Limitations of Modern Legal Personification Loso Judijanto; Ojang Oo Muptiah; Taqyuddin Kadir
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 12 (2026): Ipso Jure - January
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/6baw8m59

Abstract

The development of increasingly autonomous artificial intelligence has challenged the conceptual foundations of modern law, particularly related to the concept of legal subjects and legal accountability mechanisms. The Indonesian legal system until now does not have a specific regulation that explicitly regulates the legal status of artificial intelligence, so the regulation still depends on Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions which places artificial intelligence as part of the electronic system. This approach departs from the assumption of human control that is increasingly difficult to maintain as adaptive capabilities and independent decision-making by technology increases. This condition creates a legal vacuum that has an impact on the uncertainty of responsibility attribution when artificial intelligence causes legal consequences. This study aims to critically analyze the position of artificial intelligence in the Indonesian legal system, relevant legal accountability models, and the limitations of modern legal personification. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, conceptual, and analytical-critical approach. The results of the study show that granting the status of legal subjects to artificial intelligence has the potential to cause normative distortions and weaken the principle of human accountability. Therefore, legal reform should be directed at strengthening risk-based regulations by affirming human responsibility as the main normative actor, in order to maintain legal certainty and substantive justice.
MEDIATION EFFECT OF NOTARY VERIFICATION DALAM PERJANJIAN WARISAN DIGITAL Henny Saida Flora; edison; Taqyuddin Kadir
Leges Privatae Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): OCTOBER-JOY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ttz7qh07

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has transformed various aspects of human life, including the management of digital inheritance comprising assets such as cryptocurrencies, online accounts, and digital intellectual property rights. However, the transfer of digital inheritance often encounters both legal and technical obstacles, particularly in relation to authentication, identity verification, and disputes among heirs. This study aims to explore how notarial verification functions as a mediator in digital inheritance agreements, examining whether such verification can bridge conflicts or enhance legal certainty. The research adopts a normative juridical approach combined with comparative perspectives from religious (Islamic and Christian) and customary law systems to analyze mediation principles and the validity of notarial verification across different legal traditions. The findings reveal that notarial verification plays a significant mediating role by reducing potential disputes over digital inheritance, facilitating consensus among heirs, and reinforcing the certainty of digital inheritance execution— provided that verification procedures and standards are properly regulated. The discussion links these findings to emerging practices of digital notarization and mediation mechanisms in religious and customary law. In conclusion, notarial verification as a mediating instrument holds strategic potential in digital inheritance agreements, particularly when supported by adaptive regulations that accommodate the unique characteristics of digital assets.