Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Urgency of Arbitration in Resolving Investment Disputes in Indonesia Imamuddin; Vressilia Witama; M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih; Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1305

Abstract

Investment plays a strategic role in driving economic growth but is prone to disputes arising from contractual differences, breaches, or regulatory shifts. In Indonesia, conventional court litigation often proves lengthy, costly, and lacks confidentiality, prompting the need for effective alternative dispute resolution. This paper employs a normative legal research method, analyzing primary sources such as Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Law Number 25 of 2007 on Investment, and the 1958 New York Convention, alongside secondary literature. The study examines the position, urgency, legal framework, and enforcement of arbitration in investment disputes. Findings indicate that arbitration provides a legally recognized, final, and binding mechanism that ensures efficiency, neutrality, and confidentiality, thereby fostering investor confidence. Despite certain procedural and practical challenges, the integration of arbitration with judicial oversight maintains its effectiveness. The paper concludes that strengthening Indonesia’s arbitration system and harmonizing it with international norms is vital for promoting a stable and competitive investment climate.
Islamic Law and Positive Law Protection for Victims of False Accusations of Adultery in the Modern Era Aicha Azdina Adly Fesya; M. Fazli Pratama; Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Habiburriziq El Ardhy Saragih
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Nine Star Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v3i1.1328

Abstract

This study employs a normative qualitative method with an analysis of classical and contemporary literature. The paper examines accusations of zina and legal protection for victims in the digital era. The background of the study is rooted in the complexity of the dissemination of zina allegations through social media and digital communication platforms, which have serious implications for individual honor, social reputation, and moral integrity. From the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, unsubstantiated allegations are categorized as qadhf, requiring stringent evidentiary standards, including the testimony of four morally upright male witnesses or a voluntary confession, with violations attracting multidimensional sanctions such as corporal punishment, social discredit, and spiritual accountability. Indonesian positive law provides protection through the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), allowing victims to pursue criminal liability, compensation, and reputational rehabilitation. The results indicate that effective legal protection requires a multi-layered approach integrating law enforcement, technological interventions, and public education to restore victims’ social credibility and enhance deterrence against false accusations.
The Urgency of Arbitration in Resolving Investment Disputes in Indonesia Imamuddin; Vressilia Witama; M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih; Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1305

Abstract

Investment plays a strategic role in driving economic growth but is prone to disputes arising from contractual differences, breaches, or regulatory shifts. In Indonesia, conventional court litigation often proves lengthy, costly, and lacks confidentiality, prompting the need for effective alternative dispute resolution. This paper employs a normative legal research method, analyzing primary sources such as Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Law Number 25 of 2007 on Investment, and the 1958 New York Convention, alongside secondary literature. The study examines the position, urgency, legal framework, and enforcement of arbitration in investment disputes. Findings indicate that arbitration provides a legally recognized, final, and binding mechanism that ensures efficiency, neutrality, and confidentiality, thereby fostering investor confidence. Despite certain procedural and practical challenges, the integration of arbitration with judicial oversight maintains its effectiveness. The paper concludes that strengthening Indonesia’s arbitration system and harmonizing it with international norms is vital for promoting a stable and competitive investment climate.