Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Vressilia Witama
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Reconstructing Arbitration as the Primary Mechanism for Investment Dispute Resolution in Indonesia: Balancing Legal Certainty, Investor Protection, and Judicial Supervision Imamuddin; Vressilia Witama; M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih; Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1305

Abstract

Investment plays a pivotal role in promoting economic growth and attracting capital, yet it is inherently vulnerable to disputes arising from contractual disagreements, regulatory changes, and conflicting legal interests. Although arbitration has been widely recognized as an effective mechanism for resolving investment disputes, existing scholarship predominantly emphasizes its procedural advantages while paying limited attention to its broader institutional function within the investment governance system. This study aims to examine the urgency of arbitration in resolving investment disputes in Indonesia and to develop an integrated institutional framework for strengthening arbitration as a mechanism for ensuring legal certainty and investor protection. Employing normative legal research, the study adopts statutory and conceptual approaches by analyzing Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Law Number 25 of 2007 on Investment, the 1958 New York Convention, and relevant legal literature. The findings demonstrate that arbitration provides a legally recognized, final and binding dispute resolution mechanism that enhances procedural efficiency, neutrality, confidentiality, and legal certainty, thereby strengthening investor confidence. However, its effectiveness depends not only on legislative regulation but also on institutional coherence among arbitral tribunals, national courts, and enforcement authorities. Accordingly, this study proposes an Integrated Investment Arbitration Framework, which conceptualizes arbitration as an institutional governance model founded upon four interrelated dimensions: legal certainty, arbitral independence, proportional judicial supervision, and effective enforcement. The study concludes that strengthening these institutional dimensions is essential to maintaining investor confidence, improving Indonesia's investment climate, and aligning domestic arbitration practice with contemporary international legal standards.
Reconstructing Arbitration as the Primary Mechanism for Investment Dispute Resolution in Indonesia: Balancing Legal Certainty, Investor Protection, and Judicial Supervision Imamuddin; Vressilia Witama; M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih; Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1305

Abstract

Investment plays a pivotal role in promoting economic growth and attracting capital, yet it is inherently vulnerable to disputes arising from contractual disagreements, regulatory changes, and conflicting legal interests. Although arbitration has been widely recognized as an effective mechanism for resolving investment disputes, existing scholarship predominantly emphasizes its procedural advantages while paying limited attention to its broader institutional function within the investment governance system. This study aims to examine the urgency of arbitration in resolving investment disputes in Indonesia and to develop an integrated institutional framework for strengthening arbitration as a mechanism for ensuring legal certainty and investor protection. Employing normative legal research, the study adopts statutory and conceptual approaches by analyzing Law Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Law Number 25 of 2007 on Investment, the 1958 New York Convention, and relevant legal literature. The findings demonstrate that arbitration provides a legally recognized, final and binding dispute resolution mechanism that enhances procedural efficiency, neutrality, confidentiality, and legal certainty, thereby strengthening investor confidence. However, its effectiveness depends not only on legislative regulation but also on institutional coherence among arbitral tribunals, national courts, and enforcement authorities. Accordingly, this study proposes an Integrated Investment Arbitration Framework, which conceptualizes arbitration as an institutional governance model founded upon four interrelated dimensions: legal certainty, arbitral independence, proportional judicial supervision, and effective enforcement. The study concludes that strengthening these institutional dimensions is essential to maintaining investor confidence, improving Indonesia's investment climate, and aligning domestic arbitration practice with contemporary international legal standards.
Tindak Pidana Perdukunan Pasal 252 KUHP Nasional Ditinjau dari Hukum Pidana Islam Vressilia Witama; Zulkarnain
Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): September
Publisher : IAI Darussalam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30739/darussalam.v18i1.5546

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persamaan dan perbedaan pengaturan tindak pidana perdukunan dalam Pasal 252 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP Nasional) dan ketentuan sihir dalam Enakmen Kanun Jenayah Syariah (I) 2019 Negeri Kelantan, Malaysia, serta mengkaji dasar pemikiran dan orientasi hukum yang melandasi keduanya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), konseptual (conceptual approach), dan perbandingan (comparative approach) melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, buku, jurnal ilmiah, dan sumber hukum relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua ketentuan sama-sama merupakan bentuk pembaruan hukum yang bertujuan mencegah praktik yang berkaitan dengan kekuatan gaib dan memberikan sanksi terhadap pelakunya. Namun, Pasal 252 KUHP Nasional berlaku secara umum dan berorientasi pada perlindungan masyarakat dari klaim kekuatan gaib serta jasa yang dapat menimbulkan penderitaan. Sementara itu, ketentuan sihir dalam Enakmen Kelantan berlaku dalam lingkup hukum syariah dengan menekankan larangan praktik yang bertentangan dengan hukum syarak dan akidah. Dengan demikian, pengaturan Indonesia lebih berorientasi pada perlindungan masyarakat, sedangkan Kelantan juga menekankan penjagaan agama.
Co-Authors Imamuddin M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih Rayhan Nandini Telaumbanua Zulkarnain