Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AT-TAFAHUM: Journal of Islamic Law Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Romel Tarigan
Kejaksaan Negeri Langkat
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Dualism of the Arrangement of Jarimah Khamar and Maisir: A Comparison of Uqubat and Witnesses between Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the Criminal Code in 2023 Romel Tarigan; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Vol.2 No.3 Desember 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1323

Abstract

The dualism of the regulation of jarimah khamar and maisir in Indonesia is a consequence of the recognition of legal pluralism in the national legal system. Qanun Jinayat Aceh as a criminal law based on Islamic sharia coexists with the 2023 Criminal Code as a national criminal law. These fundamental philosophical and normative differences cause differences in the formulation of delik, the type of uqubat, as well as the system of proof and witnesses, which has the potential to give rise to legal uncertainty and differences in legal treatment of legal subjects. This study aims to analyze and compare the arrangement of jarimah khamar and maisir between the Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the 2023 Criminal Code, focusing on the difference in uqubat and witness provisions. This study also aims to examine the normative implications of the regulatory dualism in the context of the national criminal law system. The research method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials consist of primary legal materials in the form of related laws and regulations, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of literature, scientific journals, and the doctrine of criminal law and fiqh jinayah. The analysis is carried out qualitatively through systematic and teleological interpretation. The results of the discussion show that Qanun Jinayat Aceh views khamar and maisir as jarimah that threaten the moral and religious order of society, so that uqubat is formulated in the form of ta'zir sanctions that are symbolic and preventive, with a proof system influenced by the principles of fiqh jinayah. The 2023 Criminal Code regulates similar acts within the framework of modern criminal law that focuses on public order and legal certainty, with criminal sanctions of imprisonment and fines as well as a national evidentiary system. This study concludes that the dualism of regulation reflects the challenge of harmonizing national criminal law in a pluralistic legal state, so that legal policies are needed that are able to bridge religious values, legal certainty, and human rights protection proportionately.
The Dualism of the Arrangement of Jarimah Khamar and Maisir: A Comparison of Uqubat and Witnesses between Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the Criminal Code in 2023 Romel Tarigan; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Vol.2 No.3 Desember 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1323

Abstract

The dualism of the regulation of jarimah khamar and maisir in Indonesia is a consequence of the recognition of legal pluralism in the national legal system. Qanun Jinayat Aceh as a criminal law based on Islamic sharia coexists with the 2023 Criminal Code as a national criminal law. These fundamental philosophical and normative differences cause differences in the formulation of delik, the type of uqubat, as well as the system of proof and witnesses, which has the potential to give rise to legal uncertainty and differences in legal treatment of legal subjects. This study aims to analyze and compare the arrangement of jarimah khamar and maisir between the Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the 2023 Criminal Code, focusing on the difference in uqubat and witness provisions. This study also aims to examine the normative implications of the regulatory dualism in the context of the national criminal law system. The research method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials consist of primary legal materials in the form of related laws and regulations, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of literature, scientific journals, and the doctrine of criminal law and fiqh jinayah. The analysis is carried out qualitatively through systematic and teleological interpretation. The results of the discussion show that Qanun Jinayat Aceh views khamar and maisir as jarimah that threaten the moral and religious order of society, so that uqubat is formulated in the form of ta'zir sanctions that are symbolic and preventive, with a proof system influenced by the principles of fiqh jinayah. The 2023 Criminal Code regulates similar acts within the framework of modern criminal law that focuses on public order and legal certainty, with criminal sanctions of imprisonment and fines as well as a national evidentiary system. This study concludes that the dualism of regulation reflects the challenge of harmonizing national criminal law in a pluralistic legal state, so that legal policies are needed that are able to bridge religious values, legal certainty, and human rights protection proportionately.
The Authority of Religious Courts in Resolving Sharia Economic Disputes in Indonesia Romel Tarigan
AT-TAFAHUM: Journal of Law Vol 10, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sumatera Utara Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/attafahum.v10i1.30962

Abstract

The development of the sharia economy in Indonesia has increased the need for a dispute resolution system that is able to provide legal certainty in accordance with sharia principles. The expansion of the authority of the Religious Courts through amendments to the Religious Courts Law is an important foundation in resolving sharia economic disputes. This research aims to analyze the legal basis of the authority of the Religious Courts in resolving sharia economic disputes and to examine the effectiveness of the implementation of this authority in providing legal protection for the parties. The research uses normative legal research methods with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. Legal materials are obtained through literature studies consisting of laws and regulations, books, scientific journals, and other literature related to sharia economics and Religious Courts. All legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The results of the study show that the authority of the Religious Court in resolving sharia economic disputes has provided legal certainty regarding the institution authorized to adjudicate disputes arising from transactions based on sharia principles. However, the effectiveness of its implementation is still influenced by the quality of human resources, the complexity of sharia economic transactions, and the need for institutional capacity building. Therefore, strengthening the competence of judges, optimizing mediation mechanisms, and improving coordination between institutions is an important step in increasing the effectiveness of resolving sharia economic disputes through the Religious Court. Thus, the Religious Court has a strategic role in supporting the development of the sharia economy and providing legal certainty for the community.
Co-Authors Mhd Yadi Harahap