Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.379
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Mhd Yadi Harahap
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Legal Certainty in Peace Agreements in Default Disputes Through Negotiations harisman harisman; Mhd Yadi Harahap; fauziah lubis
DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 8, No 1 (2023): January-June
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/dll.v8i1.10889

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal certainty of a settlement agreement on a default dispute through negotiation. The desire to resolve the default dispute through negotiations is stated in a peace agreement. In order for the peace agreement to be effective, it is necessary to look at the legal certainty aspect. For this reason, a research was conducted with a normative juridical approach and using secondary data sourced from the literature. Secondary data were analyzed qualitatively and the results were described. Based on the analysis, it was found that the peace agreement in the negotiation is categorized as one type of agreement which is subject to the provisions of the Civil Code and Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Legal certainty and the legal force of a breach of contract peace agreement through negotiation are obtained from the implementation of Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code relating to the principle of pacta sun servanda and Article 1858 of the Civil Code, as well as the formal requirements for a peace agreement to be in writing
Konsekuensi Hukum Poligami di Indonesia dan Tunisia: Perspektif Teori Kepastian Hukum dan Maslahah Mursalah Zainuddin Zainuddin; Mhd Yadi Harahap; Ramadhan Syahmedi
Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Vol 10, No 02 (2022): Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/am.v10i02.2770

Abstract

Poligami dan keadilan adalah dua hal yang tidak mungkin dipisahkan. Keadilan adalah asas yang menjadi tempat tumbuhnya hukum, termasuk ihwal poligami. Islam menegaskan prasyarat kebolehan poligami diaksentuasikan dengan rasa dan kemampuan untuk berlaku adil (Q.S. al-Nisa (4) ayat 3. Dengan mempertimbangkan rasa keadilan dan kepastian berlaku adil, banyak negara muslim akhirnya mereformasi hukum keluarga yang menjadikan poligami sebagai aspek terpenting untuk diperhatikan, di antaranya adalah Tunisia dan Indonesia. Namun, sampai saat ini, belum ada yang memperhatikan secara serius soal konsekuensi hukum poligami yang tidak sejalan dengan keadilan. Dengan menggunakan teori kepastian hukum dan maslahah mursalah, artikel ini akan mengulas soal konsekuensi tersebut; dan pengumpulan data hingga penyimpulan, artikel ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif. Indonesia tidak memiliki aturan tegas yang memebrikan sanksi terhadap kejahatan poligami, tapi menerapkan sistem administrasi yang sulit. Sedangkan Tunisia, secara tegas mengatur ketentuan pidana dalam poligami.
Legalitas Tanah Garapan Sebagai Objek Jual Beli Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Ahmad Ridwan Nasution; Syafruddin Syam; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55637/juinhum.4.1.6756.74-82

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis legalitas tanah garapan yang dijadikan sebagai objek jual beli ditinjau dari perspektif hukum Islam dan hukum positif. Banyak masyarakat yang memanfaatkan tanah garapan yang dalam hal ini tanah bekas HGU PTPN II. Pemanfaatan itu berupa dengan menanaminya, mendirikan bangunan di atasnya, dan bahkan memperjual-belikannya. Dalam menganalisis masalah ini, penulis akan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dengan pendekatan kasus dan memakai teori istishab. Temuan yang didapat di lapangan adalah bahwa status tanah bekas HGU PTPN II tersebut merupakan tanah yang dikuasai langsung oleh negara. Untuk itu, tanah bekas HGU PTPN II tidak boleh dijadikan sebagai objek transaksi jual beli jika tidak ada izin dari negara.
Dissenting Opinion Pengangkatan Anak oleh Kakek Kandung Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Demak No.0033/Pdt.P/2010/PA.Dmk Khofifah Nabila; Mhd Yadi Harahap
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1503

Abstract

Adoption or what is known as adoption or tabanni is the adoption of someone else's child as their own child but the biological parents do not necessarily let go of their hands, only that they will still have a relationship with their child. According to Government Regulation no. 54 of 2007 concerning Implementation of Child Adoption. This research applies a normative juridical method (Legal Research), which is a type of research used to examine the rules or norms in positive law. After conducting this research, the results obtained were that there was a Dissenting Opinion regarding the decision in the case of appointing a grandson as an adopted child, where the opinion of the Member Judge was afraid that there would be problems regarding inheritance if it was granted and the opinion of the Chief Judge of the Panel could be granted for the benefit of the child himself, without sever the lineage relationship with the biological parents as well as the prospective adoptive parents of the same religion as the child concerned or the same religion as the biological parents of the child concerned if the child is still small.
Potential Utilisation and Distribution of Professional Zakat at the Ministry of Religious Affairs of North Sumatra Syabrun Jukhoir; Ansari Yamamah; Mhd Yadi Harahap
JURNAL AKTA Vol 10, No 4 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v10i4.35097

Abstract

The National Amil Zakat Agency is given the authority as the national zakat manager, and also has the right to verify the establishment of Amil Zakat Institutions and Zakat Collection Units, this is stated in Law No. 23 of 2011, Professional Zakat in the perspective of this Law, there is an affirmation that professional zakat has been officially and legally, binding and juridically institutionalised in Indonesian regulations.  Civil Servants are a source of zakat income for the National Amil Zakat Agency at the Ministry of Religious Affairs of North Sumatra Province. This study aims to analyse the potential utilization and distribution of professional zakat and management in the management of zakat for the profession of Civil Servants in the National Amil Zakat Agency, as well as to analyse the supporting and inhibiting factors in zakat management research. The method in this research is descriptive qualitative research. Data collection techniques are interviews, observation, and documentation, as well as literature studies through national journals. National Amil Zakat Agency information data about the potential utilisation and distribution of professional zakat. Conclusion The results of the study convey that one of the potential utilisation and distribution of professional zakat has not been carried out effectively due to the absence of an independent control board in the structure of the National Amil Zakat Agency and the less than optimal implementation of professional zakat collection with supporting factors and solutions to existing obstacles in professional zakat management activities.
Corruption in the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law and Indonesian Criminal Law Reform Yoyok Adi Syahputra; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1313

Abstract

Corruption is a multidimensional problem that not only harms the state's finances, but also damages the moral, social, and justice order of society. In an Islamic perspective, corruption is seen as a despicable act that is contrary to the principles of trust and justice, although the term corruption is not found explicitly in classical jurisprudence literature. The Qur'an and Sunnah have substantively regulated the prohibition of acts that have a corrupt character through the concepts of ghulul, thioniah, risywah, ghasab, and unlawful possession-eating. This condition requires the formulation of anti-corruption fiqh that is contextual and relevant to modern legal challenges. This research aims to analyze the concept of corruption from the perspective of Islamic criminal law and formulate anti-corruption jurisprudence with the approach of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah, as well as examine its relevance to the Indonesian criminal law system. The research method used is normative legal research with a conceptual, philosophical, and legislative approach, through the study of the Qur'an, Sunnah, fiqh rules, classical and contemporary fiqh literature, as well as laws and regulations related to corruption. The results of the discussion show that corruption in Islamic criminal law is more appropriately qualified as jarīmah ta'zīr because it does not have explicit sanctions in nash, but it has a broad and systemic impact. The principles of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah place corruption as a serious violation of the protection of property and even human souls. Corruption eradication regulations in Indonesia's positive law are basically in line with the principle of ta'zīr as long as it is oriented towards the public good. This study concludes that the integration of anti-corruption fiqh values with national criminal law is a strategic step in realizing the rule of law that is just and based on moral and social values.
Hudud Adultery and Sexual Crimes: A Comparison of Qanun Jinayat and the National Criminal Code Danang Dermawan; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1314

Abstract

The regulation of the crime of adultery in Indonesian law shows that there is a fundamental difference between Qanun Aceh Number 6 of 2014 concerning the Jinayat Law and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. These differences are not only related to the formulation of delicacies, but also reflect the difference in legal paradigm between Islamic criminal law which emphasizes the protection of public morals and national criminal law which is oriented towards the protection of private rights and human rights. This condition raises juridical problems related to consistency, legal certainty, and limits of state authority in regulating the sexual behavior of citizens. This study aims to analyze and compare the conception of adultery, the nature of delicacy, the mechanism of proof, and the orientation of punishment in Qanun Jinayat and the National Criminal Code. This study uses normative legal research methods with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are obtained through literature studies of laws and regulations, Islamic legal sources, and relevant legal literature, then analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively. The results of the discussion show that Qanun Jinayat views adultery as a hudud jarimah with theological and social dimensions, so that it can be processed without complaints and applies very strict evidentiary standards as a form of prudence. The National Criminal Code places adultery as an absolute complaint with a modern evidentiary system, which emphasizes the orientation to the protection of family privacy and honor. This study concludes that the difference in the regulation of adultery reflects the plurality of Indonesian criminal law and demands the harmonization of criminal law policies to be in harmony with religious values, human rights, and the principles of the modern state of law.
The Penal System in Islamic Law: The Concepts of Jarimah, Uqubat, and Taʿzir Arifin Siahaan; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1315

Abstract

The penal system in Islamic law is an integral part of the sharia which aims to maintain social order, uphold justice, and protect human dignity. The concept of jarimah as a criminal act in Islamic law is not only understood as a violation of legal norms, but also as a violation of divine provisions derived from the Qur'an and Sunnah. Criminality in Islam is manifested through uqubat which is classified into hudud, qishash-diyat, and taʿzir, each of which has different characteristics, purposes, and legal basis. This research aims to analyze conceptually and normatively the penal system in Islamic law by focusing on the definition of jarimah, forms of uqubat, and the principles of criminal law that underlie it. The research method used is normative legal research with a conceptual, philosophical, and normative-shari'a approach, through the study of the Qur'an, Sunnah, the opinions of the jurists, and Islamic criminal law literature. The results of the discussion show that the penal system in Islamic law is built on the principles of justice, certainty, and benefit, which is reflected in the strict standard of proof of hudud, the proportional nature of qishash-diyat, and the flexibility of taʿzir in responding to social dynamics. The difference in the views of scholars in interpreting the postulates of criminalization confirms that Islamic criminal law has an adaptive character without losing its normative legitimacy. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the penal system in Islamic law is a comprehensive legal system and oriented towards substantive justice, crime prevention, and protection of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah.
Qisas in the Crime of Murder: A Comparison of Islamic Criminal Law and the Criminal Code Kamaluddin Pane; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1316

Abstract

The crime of murder is the most serious crime because it directly deprives people of the right to life, thus demanding a penal system that not only provides legal certainty, but also substantive justice. Islamic criminal law through the concepts of qisās and diyat offers a model of punishment that balances retributive justice, humanity, and welfare, by giving a central role to the victim's family. Meanwhile, the Indonesian Criminal Code, both in its old form and through Law No. 1 of 2023, places murder as a crime against the state with a penal approach that is increasingly shifting towards corrective and rehabilitative, especially through the provision of the conditional death penalty. This study aims to analyze and compare the concept of qisās in Islamic criminal law with the regulation of the crime of murder in the Indonesian Criminal Code in order to find common points and fundamental differences in the paradigm of justice adhered to. The research method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches, through literature studies on sources of Islamic law and positive law. The results of the discussion showed that Islamic criminal law emphasizes commensurate justice and the right to forgiveness of victims as a mechanism of social control, while the Criminal Code emphasizes the dominance of the state in criminalization with limited space for the role of the victim. In conclusion, this comparison shows that the values of justice in qisās have conceptual relevance to enrich the development of a national criminal law that is more just, humane, and responsive to the interests of victims without neglecting the principle of the rule of law.
Jarimah Qadzaf and Uqubatnya, Comparison Between Qonun No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat and the Criminal Code Saifuddin AW; Mhd Yadi Harahap
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1317

Abstract

The phenomenon of accusations of adultery without real evidence and defamation raises serious problems in the moral, social, and legal order of society. In the perspective of Islamic law, this act is known as jarimah qadzaf, which not only damages the reputation of the individual but also interferes with social integrity and the principle of justice. The application of qadzaf in Indonesia shows that there is a fundamental difference between national law and the sharia qanun that applies in Aceh, thus creating challenges in legal harmonization. This study aims to analyze the concept of jarimah qadzaf and its uqubat, as well as compare its application between Qanun Aceh No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat and the Criminal Code (KUHP). The research method used is normative research with a comparative law approach, based on the study of legal documents in the form of the Qur'an, Hadith, Qanun, and the Criminal Code, as well as relevant secondary legal literature. The analysis is carried out qualitatively to understand the substantive, philosophical, and procedural aspects of the existing regulations. The results of the study showed that Qanun Aceh placed qadzaf as a hudud crime with the sanction of eighty lashes, focusing on the protection of individual honor and preventive effects. While the Criminal Code places the accusation of adultery as a defamation complaint with imprisonment or fines, it emphasizes procedural certainty rather than moral and spiritual aspects. This difference reflects the different legal philosophies between the sharia approach and national positive law, but both have the goals of protecting the community and enforcing justice. In conclusion, a deep understanding of qadzaf and its comparison with the Criminal Code is important to integrate moral principles, ethics, and legal procedures, as well as ensure fair protection of individuals and social interests.
Co-Authors -, Harisman Afriansyah Ahmad Ridwan Nasution Ansari Yamamah Arifin Siahaan Danang Dermawan Fauziah Lubis Fery Dianta Ginting Kamaluddin Pane Khofifah Nabila Muhammad Firman Akhsani Muniruddin Ritonga Ramadhan Syahmedi Romel Tarigan Said Reza Pahlevi Saifuddin AW Suhardiman Syabrun Jukhoir Syafruddin Syam Yoyok Adi Syahputra Zainuddin Zainuddin