Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Innovative and Creativity
Febrian Rizky Akbar
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Ganda Media Sosial dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Sosio-Legal antara Peluang Transparansi dan Risiko Erosi Due Process Irwan Triadi; Febrian Rizky Akbar
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.5498

Abstract

This socio-legal study analyzes the dual role of social media in Indonesia's criminal justice system from 2019 to 2024 through thematic analysis of 15 viral legal cases. The research demonstrates that while social media enhances transparency and accelerates investigations in 80% of cases examined, it simultaneously erodes fundamental due process principles in 53% of cases through trial by social media and digital vigilantism. The phenomenon of "no viral no justice" reveals a critical institutional failure, where law enforcement agencies have externalized case prioritization functions to digital virality metrics rather than maintaining equal application of law. The study introduces the concept of "justice outsourcing" to explain how public pressure forces hasty responses that may compromise the presumption of innocence and equality before the law. Through analysis of secondary data including regulatory frameworks, institutional reports, and verified digital documentation, this research identifies a central tension between substantive justice demands and procedural integrity. The findings reveal that law enforcement responses, while demonstrating adaptability, often sacrifice careful investigation protocols for rapid public satisfaction. The study proposes a collaborative governance model involving law enforcement, digital forensic specialists, and independent fact-checking communities, alongside regulatory updates to the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (UU ITE), to mitigate disinformation risks while protecting suspect rights and maintaining due process standards in the digital public sphere.
Fenomena "No Viral No Justice" di Indonesia: Disrupsi Legitimasi Institusional dan Dilema Keadilan Selektif di Era Jaringan Febrian Rizky Akbar; Dhikma Heradika
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.5499

Abstract

The "no viral no justice" (NVNJ) phenomenon reflects a condition wherein the resolution of a legal or social case in Indonesia only gains attention or concrete action from authorities and competent institutions after the case becomes viral on social media. This research analyzes the dynamics of this phenomenon through the integration of legal sociology perspectives, digital communication, and critical justice theory. The research employs a qualitative approach with triangulation of literature review, digital discourse analysis of viral cases during the 2023-2024 period, and comparative examination. Research findings demonstrate that virality functions as an effective mechanism of mass amplified pressure in accelerating institutional response. However, dependence on virality potentially creates selective justice, threatens the principle of equal treatment (Rawlsian Justice), and erodes the rational-legal legitimacy (Weberian) of legal institutions. This phenomenon indicates the existence of a profound deficit in public trust toward formal bureaucratic channels. To address the dilemma of selective justice, transparent and proactive reporting system reforms are required, strengthened judicial ethics in facing public intervention, and enhanced digital legal literacy. This article contributes to legal sociology literature by introducing the Selective Justice Trilemma model as an analytical framework for NVNJ.
Co-Authors Dhikma Heradika Irwan Triadi