Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Proses Verzet Terhadap Putusan Verstek Eliza Yuniar; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.5793

Abstract

This study is motivated by the need to ensure balanced legal protection for parties involved in verzet processes against verstek decisions within civil procedural law, especially amid the digitization of the judiciary. The objective is to analyze the legal position of the parties and evaluate the effectiveness of the verzet mechanism in guaranteeing proportional legal protection. The research adopts a normative juridical type with a literature review method. The population comprises legislation, procedural law doctrines, and court decisions relevant to verzet and verstek in Indonesia. Selected samples are purposive documents based on relevance. Data instruments include primary and secondary legal documents analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques through comparative and synthetic textual analysis. The findings reveal verzet as a crucial instrument to protect defendants’ rights; however, its effectiveness remains constrained by administrative and technical challenges in notification and electronic court system implementation. The conclusion emphasizes the need for procedural law reform, improved human resource capacity, and technological infrastructure to enhance verzet’s functionality in the future.
Kendala Normatif Penerapan E-Litigasi dalam Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Annisa Nurmalasari Hutapea; Eliza Yuniar; Kusuma Daniel Kusnadi; Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 8 (2026): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i8.3629

Abstract

The implementation of e-litigation in the Constitutional Court represents an institutional response to the demands of digital transformation within the constitutional justice system. However, its application faces fundamental normative challenges, particularly the lack of comprehensive regulations governing electronic proceedings and the insufficient protection of the constitutional rights of litigants in a digital environment. This study aims to analyze and identify normative gaps in the regulatory framework of e-litigation in the Constitutional Court and to examine their implications for safeguarding the constitutional rights of the parties involved. Employing normative legal research methods through statutory, conceptual and analytical approaches, this study finds that the existing regulations of the Constitutional Court on e-litigation remain inadequate in several key aspects. These include the legal validity of electronic evidence, data protection for litigants, guarantees of digital accessibility for marginalized groups and mechanisms for addressing technical disruptions that may affect court proceedings. The novelty of this research lies in the construction of a new normative framework, namely the Trias Digitalis Constitutionalis Principle, which encompasses three dimensions: equitable accessibility, digital procedural integrity and constitutional guarantees within the electronic sphere. This study recommends a comprehensive revision of the Constitutional Court’s regulations on e-litigation, along with the development of more detailed technical rules.