Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Recital Review Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law
Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Transfer of Mortgage Rights Resulting from Cession as a Land Administration Act: Peralihan Hak Tanggungan akibat Cessie sebagai Tindakan Administrasi Pertanahan Krisnawaty, Krisnawaty; Muskibah, Muskibah; Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v7i1.53383

Abstract

This article analyzes the transfer of Mortgage Rights resulting from the assignment of receivables (cessie) within the framework of land and administrative law. The issue arises from differing interpretations of Article 16 paragraph (1) of the Mortgage Law concerning the phrase “by operation of law” in relation to the principle of publicity in land registration. Using a normative legal method with statutory and administrative law approaches, this study examines the juridical status of recording the transfer of Mortgage Rights at the Land Office. The findings show that although Mortgage Rights follow the receivable under the principle of accessorium sequitur principale, the transfer only gains external legal effect after being recorded in the land register. Such recording constitutes a land administrative act that fulfills the characteristics of a State Administrative Decision, as it is concrete, individual, and final, producing legal consequences for the new creditor. Therefore, legal certainty and protection depend on the legality of the administrative action carried out in accordance with the principles of legality and good governance.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Kebenaran Akta Otentik: Studi Putusan MA No. 379K/Pid/2021 Tapsirudin, Tapsirudin; Zulfa Aulia, M.; Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Recital Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8 Nomor 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v8i1.53117

Abstract

An authentic deed drawn up by a notary functions as an evidentiary instrument that ensures legal certainty and protection for the parties. In notarial practice, problems arise when a deed formally complies with legal requirements but fails to reflect the actual legal transaction. This condition raises debates concerning the scope of a notary’s responsibility for the formal and material accuracy of an authentic deed. This study aims to analyze the legal regulations governing notarial responsibility and to examine the form of legal liability as reflected in Supreme Court Decision Number 379 K/Pid/2021. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that the Notary Office Act does not clearly define the obligation of notaries to guarantee material truth. The Supreme Court interprets that a notary may incur criminal liability when he or she is aware of discrepancies between the substance of the deed and the parties’ actual legal acts. This interpretation generates legal uncertainty and requires normative clarification. 
Co-Authors Krisnawaty Krisnawaty, Krisnawaty Muskibah Muskibah Tapsirudin, Tapsirudin Zulfa Aulia, M.