Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Transfer of Mortgage Rights Resulting from Cession as a Land Administration Act: Peralihan Hak Tanggungan akibat Cessie sebagai Tindakan Administrasi Pertanahan Krisnawaty, Krisnawaty; Muskibah, Muskibah; Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v7i1.53383

Abstract

This article analyzes the transfer of Mortgage Rights resulting from the assignment of receivables (cessie) within the framework of land and administrative law. The issue arises from differing interpretations of Article 16 paragraph (1) of the Mortgage Law concerning the phrase “by operation of law” in relation to the principle of publicity in land registration. Using a normative legal method with statutory and administrative law approaches, this study examines the juridical status of recording the transfer of Mortgage Rights at the Land Office. The findings show that although Mortgage Rights follow the receivable under the principle of accessorium sequitur principale, the transfer only gains external legal effect after being recorded in the land register. Such recording constitutes a land administrative act that fulfills the characteristics of a State Administrative Decision, as it is concrete, individual, and final, producing legal consequences for the new creditor. Therefore, legal certainty and protection depend on the legality of the administrative action carried out in accordance with the principles of legality and good governance.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Kebenaran Akta Otentik: Studi Putusan MA No. 379K/Pid/2021 Tapsirudin, Tapsirudin; Zulfa Aulia, M.; Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Recital Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8 Nomor 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v8i1.53117

Abstract

An authentic deed drawn up by a notary functions as an evidentiary instrument that ensures legal certainty and protection for the parties. In notarial practice, problems arise when a deed formally complies with legal requirements but fails to reflect the actual legal transaction. This condition raises debates concerning the scope of a notary’s responsibility for the formal and material accuracy of an authentic deed. This study aims to analyze the legal regulations governing notarial responsibility and to examine the form of legal liability as reflected in Supreme Court Decision Number 379 K/Pid/2021. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that the Notary Office Act does not clearly define the obligation of notaries to guarantee material truth. The Supreme Court interprets that a notary may incur criminal liability when he or she is aware of discrepancies between the substance of the deed and the parties’ actual legal acts. This interpretation generates legal uncertainty and requires normative clarification. 
Integritas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Autentik dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Satya Wibowo, Wahyu; Najwan, Johni; Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 2 Juli 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v4i2.18861

Abstract

Notaries as public officials who have the authority to make authentic deeds, in carrying out their duties are also attached to obligations that must be obeyed, because these obligations are something that must be carried out. Notaries are obliged to act honestly, thoroughly, independently, impartially and protect the interests of the parties involved in legal actions. The notary's obligations are included in the obligations to the client. Notaries as public officials are really required to have integrity. Integrity is the unity or consistency between heart, speech and action. A notary must: 1) have moral integrity, 2) a notary must be honest with his clients and himself (intellectual honesty), 3) be aware of the limits of his authority. Without or lack of integrity of a notary in carrying out his office, he will be very vulnerable to carry out manipulative, corruptive, collusive, dishonest/pure actions, conspiracy/secret approval, and many other negative actions. The notary is required to be responsible for the deed he has made. If the deed that was made turns out to be a dispute later on, the thing that needs to be questioned is whether this deed was the fault of the notary or the fault of the parties who did not want to be honest in giving their statements before a notary or whether there was an agreement between the two parties facing it. If the deed issued by a notary contains legal defects that occur due to the notary's error, either due to his negligence or because of the notary's own intention, then the notary must provide accountability. Violation of the Notary's Code of Ethics by a Notary may be subject to civil sanctions, administrative sanctions, and criminal sanctions. Abstrak Notaris selaku pejabat umum yang mempunyai kewenangan membuat akta otentik, dalam menjalankan tugasnya melekat pula kewajiban yang harus dipatuhi, karena kewajiban tersebut merupakan sesuatu yang harus dilaksanakan. Notaris berkewajiban bertindak jujur, seksama, mandiri, tidak berpihak dan menjaga kepentingan pihak yang terkait dalam perbuatan hukum. Kewajiban notaris tersebut termasuk ke dalam kewajiban terhadap klien. Notaris sebagai pejabat umum sungguh dituntut memiliki integritas. Integritas merupakan kesatupaduan atau konsistensi antara hati, ucapan dan tindakan. Notaris harus: 1) mempunyai integritas moral, 2) seorang Notaris harus jujur terhadap klien maupun dirinya sendiri (kejujuran intelektual), 3) sadar akan batas-batas kewenangannya. Tanpa atau kurangnya integritas notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya, maka akan rentan sekali untuk melakukan tindakan-tindakan manipulatif, koruptif, kolutif, tidak jujur/murni, sekongkolan/persetujuan rahasia, dan masih banyak lagi tindakan negatif lainnya. Notaris dituntut untuk bertanggung jawab terhadap akta yang telah dibuatnya. Apabila akta yang dibuat ternyata dibelakang hari menimbulkan sengketa, maka hal yang perlu dipertanyakan adalah apakah akta ini merupakan kesalahan notaris atau kesalahan para pihak yang tidak mau jujur dalam memberikan keterangannya dihadapan notaris atau terdapatnya kesepakatan kedua belah pihak yang menghadap. Jika akta yang diterbitkan notaris mengandung cacat hukum yang terjadi karena kesalahan notaris, baik karena kelalaiannya maupun karena kesengajaan notaris itu sendiri, maka Notaris harus memberikan pertanggung jawaban. Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris yang dilakukan Notaris dapat dikenakan sanksi perdata, sanksi administrasi, dan sanksi pidana.  
Kedudukan Notaris Yang Mengambil Cuti Karena Diangkat Menjadi Anggota Legislatif Vigo Putra, Astra; Rahmi, Elita; Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Recital Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Vol. 5 No. 1 Januari 2023
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v5i1.19105

Abstract

The duty of a notary as a public official is to serve the public concerned. As a servant, of course, a very noble task borne by a Notary. By referring to the UUJN which is actually a regulation that regulates his position, according to the author, it does not violate the law if it overrides the election law regarding concurrent positions. And also no party will be harmed if a Notary who is a member of the DPR applies for leave, in other words it does not stop. Notaries are required to apply for leave, and appoint a substitute Notary as stated in Article 11 paragraph (1-3) of the UUJN if the Notary is elected as a member of the Legislature. Because based on Article 17 letter d of the UUJN, a Notary is prohibited from serving as a state official. Regarding the request for leave due to being appointed as a State Official, the MPP must have received it within a maximum period of 60 (sixty) days from the date the decision as a State Official is stipulated. Before a Notary submits an application for leave, the mechanism in applying for a Notary leave that needs to be done first is to apply for a Leave certificate to the Directorate General of AHU Online. The request for leave must be received by the Regional Supervisory Council, Regional Supervisory Council, or Central Supervisory Council at the latest 30 (thirty) days before the leave is implemented, unless there are other valid reasons. Abstrak  Tugas Notaris sebagai pejabat umum ialah melayani masyarakat yang berkepentingan. Sebagai pelayan, tentunya sangat mulia tugas yang dipikul oleh Notaris. Dengan mengacu terhadap UUJN yang notabene sebuah peraturan yang mengatur akan jabatannya, menurut penulis tidak melanggar hukum apabila mengesampingkan Undang-undang pemilu soal rangkap jabatan. Dan juga tidak ada pihak yang dirugikan apabila Notaris yang menjadi anggota DPR mengajukan cuti, dengan kata lain tidak berhenti. Notaris wajib mengajukan cuti, dan menunjuk Notaris pengganti seperti yang disebutkandalamPasal 11 ayat (1-3) UUJN apabilaNotaris terpilih menjadi anggota Legislatif. Karena berdasarkan Pasal 17 huruf d UUJN Notaris di larangrangkap jabatan menjadi pejabat negara. Mengenai permohonan cuti karena diangkat menjadi Pejabat Negara harus sudah diterima MPP dalam jangka waktu paling lama 60 (enam puluh) hari sejak tanggal keputusan sebagai Pejabat Negara ditetapkan. Sebelum Notaris mengajukan permohonan cuti, mekanisme dalam pengajuan cuti Notaris yang perlu dilakukan terlebih dahulu ialah mengajukan permohonan sertifikat Cuti kepada Direktorat Jendral AHU Online. Permohonan cuti sudah harus diterima oleh Majelis Pengawas Daerah, Majelis Pengawas Wilayah, atau Majelis Pengawas Pusat dalam jangka waktu paling lambat 30 (tiga puluh) hari sebelum cuti dilaksanakan, kecuali ada alasan lain yang sah.  
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Kebenaran Akta Otentik: Studi Putusan MA No. 379K/Pid/2021 Tapsirudin, Tapsirudin; Zulfa Aulia, M.; Abu Bakar, Firdaus
Recital Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Volume 8 Nomor 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v8i1.53117

Abstract

An authentic deed drawn up by a notary functions as an evidentiary instrument that ensures legal certainty and protection for the parties. In notarial practice, problems arise when a deed formally complies with legal requirements but fails to reflect the actual legal transaction. This condition raises debates concerning the scope of a notary’s responsibility for the formal and material accuracy of an authentic deed. This study aims to analyze the legal regulations governing notarial responsibility and to examine the form of legal liability as reflected in Supreme Court Decision Number 379 K/Pid/2021. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that the Notary Office Act does not clearly define the obligation of notaries to guarantee material truth. The Supreme Court interprets that a notary may incur criminal liability when he or she is aware of discrepancies between the substance of the deed and the parties’ actual legal acts. This interpretation generates legal uncertainty and requires normative clarification.