Pendi Nurul Azmi
Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

THE POLEMIC OF HOUSEHOLD WORK BETWEEN WOMEN AND MEN IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF GENDER EQUALITY: Polemik Pekerjaan Rumah Tangga Antara Perempuan dengan Laki-Laki dalam Perspektif Kesetaraan Gender Hasan Subhani; Pendi Nurul Azmi
Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Neo-Contemporary Quranic Studies in Reconfiguring Islamic Civilization
Publisher : Tunas Harapan Ummat Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66236/senarai.2026.2.2.210-229

Abstract

This study discusses the issue of household work from the perspective of the Quran through a gender analysis. Socially, Muslim societies tend to regard domestic work as the responsibility of women, while men are positioned in the public sphere. Such perceptions are largely influenced by patriarchal cultural constructions that also shape interpretations of Quranic verses concerning marital relations. Through a feminist tafsir approach, this study seeks to re-examine verses such as Q.S. An-Nisā’ [4]: 34, Q.S. At-Taubah [9]: 71, Q.S. Al-Baqarah [2]: 187, and Q.S. Ar-Rūm [30]: 21 to explore how the Quran explains the concepts of justice and reciprocity within family life. The findings indicate that the Quran never explicitly assigns household work as the obligation of women. On the contrary, it emphasizes the principles of musyārakah (partnership), mawaddah wa raḥmah (affection and mercy), and mubādalah (mutuality) as the foundation of marital relationships. Therefore, domestic work should be understood as a shared responsibility grounded in the values of justice, love, and mutual respect as taught by the Quran. The study aims to reinterpret Quranic verses often associated with male dominance, emphasizing instead their moral message of partnership and mutual responsibility.  
THE INTERPRETATIONS OF QURAN SURAH AN-NISA (4): 3 BY IBN JARIR AL-TABARI IN JAMI‘ AL-BAYAN FI TA’WIL AL-QUR’AN AND ABU LAYTH AL-SAMARQANDI IN BAHR AL-‘ULUM: Penafsiran Ibnu Jarir Ath-Thabari dalam Tafsir “Jami’ul Bayan fii Ta’wilil Qur’an” dan Abu Layts As-Samarqandi dalam Tafsir “Bahrul Ulum” Terhadap Q.S An-Nisa’ ayat 3 Pendi Nurul Azmi; R. Edi Komarudin; Asep Ahmad Fathurahman
Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Neo-Contemporary Quranic Studies in Reconfiguring Islamic Civilization
Publisher : Tunas Harapan Ummat Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66236/senarai.2026.2.2.165-182

Abstract

Qur’anic interpretation is a continuous scholarly endeavor to elucidate divine guidance in response to evolving social contexts through both classical and contemporary approaches. This study examines the interpretations of Q.S. An-Nisāʾ (4):3 by two prominent exegetes, Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī in Jāmiʿ al-Bayān fī Taʾwīl al-Qurʾān and Abū Layth al-Samarqandī in Baḥr al-ʿUlūm, employing a tafsīr muqāran (comparative exegesis) method to identify similarities, differences, and underlying methodological orientations. The findings demonstrate that Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī adopts a strong riwāyah-based approach, presenting extensive narrations from the Companions and Successors and emphasizing justice as the fundamental condition for marrying more than one woman. In contrast, Abū Layth al-Samarqandī prioritizes a practical fiqh-oriented perspective, offering concise and accessible explanations intended for broader audiences. Despite these methodological differences, both exegetes concur that the verse underscores the imperative to avoid injustice toward orphan girls due to their vulnerability, while simultaneously warning against injustice toward other women in marriage. This study affirms the significance of comparative Qur’anic interpretation in enriching contemporary discussions on polygamy by reaffirming justice as the core ethical principle underlying Islamic law.
THEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF MUTASHABIH VERSES IN IBN KATHIR’S AL-QUR’AN AL-‘AZIM AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR SUNNI THEOLOGICAL DISCOURSE: Corak Teologis Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Mutasyabih dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-‘Azhim Karya Ibnu Kaṡir dan Implikasinya terhadap Diskursus Teologi Sunni Pendi Nurul Azmi
Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): Islamic Heritage and Civilization
Publisher : Tunas Harapan Ummat Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66236/senarai.2026.2.4.518-568

Abstract

This study examines the interpretation of the verses concerning the Divine Attributes (āyāt al-ṣifāt) in Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm by Ibn Kathīr, focusing on the theological tendency reflected in his exegesis. This research is motivated by differing views regarding Ibn Kathīr’s theological position within the discourse of Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā‘ah. Some scholars place him close to the Ash‘arite tradition, while others argue that his exegetical method more accurately reflects the Atharite approach. These differing assessments make Ibn Kathīr’s interpretation of the verses concerning the Divine Attributes an important subject of academic investigation in order to obtain a more objective understanding of his theological orientation. This study employs a qualitative library research method. The primary source of data is Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm by Ibn Kathīr, while supporting data are drawn from various works on Qur’anic exegesis, ‘Ulūm Al-Qur’ān, and theological literature representing both Ash‘arite and Atharite thought. The analysis is conducted through descriptive-analytical and comparative methods, examining Ibn Kathīr’s interpretations of several verses concerning the Divine Attributes, including istiwā’ (rising above the Throne), kalām Allāh (the Speech of Allah), wajh Allāh (the Face of Allah), ru’yatullāh (the Beatific Vision), and jā’a Allāh (the Coming of Allah), and comparing them with the methodological characteristics of the two theological schools. The findings indicate that Ibn Kathīr’s interpretation of the verses concerning the Divine Attributes is generally closer to the Atharite approach. This is evident in his tendency to affirm Allah’s attributes as mentioned in the revealed texts without resorting to figurative interpretation (ta’wīl), while rejecting takyīf (specifying the modality), tamthīl (likening Allah to His creation), ta‘ṭīl (negating the attributes), and taḥrīf (distorting their meanings). In his interpretations of the verses concerning istiwā’, kalām Allāh, ru’yatullāh, and jā’a Allāh, Ibn Kathīr consistently follows the methodology of the Salaf by maintaining the apparent textual meanings in a manner befitting Allah’s majesty. Although, in interpreting wajh Allāh, he occasionally explains it as referring to Allah’s Essence (dhāt Allāh), this is insufficient to alter the overall tendency of his methodology. Therefore, this study concludes that Ibn Kathīr’s theological orientation in interpreting the verses concerning the Divine Attributes is closer to Atharism than to Ash‘arism. This finding demonstrates that Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr represents one of the significant examples of the Salaf-oriented exegetical approach within the tradition of Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jamā‘ah.