Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization
R. Edi Komarudin
Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE INTERPRETATIONS OF QURAN SURAH AN-NISA (4): 3 BY IBN JARIR AL-TABARI IN JAMI‘ AL-BAYAN FI TA’WIL AL-QUR’AN AND ABU LAYTH AL-SAMARQANDI IN BAHR AL-‘ULUM: Penafsiran Ibnu Jarir Ath-Thabari dalam Tafsir “Jami’ul Bayan fii Ta’wilil Qur’an” dan Abu Layts As-Samarqandi dalam Tafsir “Bahrul Ulum” Terhadap Q.S An-Nisa’ ayat 3 Pendi Nurul Azmi; R. Edi Komarudin; Asep Ahmad Fathurahman
Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Neo-Contemporary Quranic Studies in Reconfiguring Islamic Civilization
Publisher : Tunas Harapan Ummat Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66236/senarai.2026.2.2.165-182

Abstract

Qur’anic interpretation is a continuous scholarly endeavor to elucidate divine guidance in response to evolving social contexts through both classical and contemporary approaches. This study examines the interpretations of Q.S. An-Nisāʾ (4):3 by two prominent exegetes, Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī in Jāmiʿ al-Bayān fī Taʾwīl al-Qurʾān and Abū Layth al-Samarqandī in Baḥr al-ʿUlūm, employing a tafsīr muqāran (comparative exegesis) method to identify similarities, differences, and underlying methodological orientations. The findings demonstrate that Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī adopts a strong riwāyah-based approach, presenting extensive narrations from the Companions and Successors and emphasizing justice as the fundamental condition for marrying more than one woman. In contrast, Abū Layth al-Samarqandī prioritizes a practical fiqh-oriented perspective, offering concise and accessible explanations intended for broader audiences. Despite these methodological differences, both exegetes concur that the verse underscores the imperative to avoid injustice toward orphan girls due to their vulnerability, while simultaneously warning against injustice toward other women in marriage. This study affirms the significance of comparative Qur’anic interpretation in enriching contemporary discussions on polygamy by reaffirming justice as the core ethical principle underlying Islamic law.
THE PRINCIPLE OF PERMISSIBILITY AND NORMATIVE CONSTRAINTS IN CONTEMPORARY FIQH MUAMALAH: Asas Kebolehan dan Batasan Normatif dalam Fiqh Muamalah Kontemporer Mohammad Irfan; R. Edi Komarudin; Asep Ahmad Fathurahman
Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Neo-Contemporary Quranic Studies in Reconfiguring Islamic Civilization
Publisher : Tunas Harapan Ummat Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66236/senarai.2026.2.2.230-246

Abstract

Contemporary fiqh muamalah represents a methodological extension of classical fiqh muamalah aimed at preserving the relevance of Islamic law in the face of modern social and economic transformations. Theoretically, contemporary fiqh muamalah functions as a normative system that integrates the primary sources of Islamic law namely the Qur’an, sunnah, ijmaʿ, and qiyas with evolving social, economic, and technological realities. This study seeks to examine the theoretical framework of contemporary fiqh muamalah, particularly the principle of permissibility and its normative constraints, in addressing modern transactional practices. Employing a qualitative approach through library research with descriptive-argumentative analysis, this study finds that the principle of permissibility (al-aṣl fī al-muʿāmalāt al-ibāḥah) constitutes the foundational maxim for assessing contemporary transactions, while remaining inherently bounded by axiomatic normative principles, including the prohibition of riba, gharar, tadlis, maysir, as well as unlawful products and invalid contracts. In relation to modern economic instruments such as cryptocurrency and venture capital, contemporary fiqh muamalah necessitates an evaluative and contextual approach rather than generalized legal judgments. Cryptocurrency must be assessed based on its function, mechanism, and intended use, whereas venture capital may be deemed compatible with Islamic legal principles when structured within equitable and transparent partnership-based contracts. This study recommends further research that incorporates empirical and interdisciplinary approaches to examine the practical application of contemporary fiqh muamalah principles in digital finance and modern investment models, thereby strengthening an adaptive and maslahah-oriented formulation of Islamic law.
Co-Authors Asep Ahmad Fathurahman Mohammad Irfan Farraz Haecal Pendi Nurul Azmi