Yohana Rosita Dewi Mariyani
Universitas PGRI Mpu Sindok

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Civic Deficit Among High School Students: A Qualitative Study of Constitutional Political Education in Public Schools Rengga Yudha Santoso; Yohana Rosita Dewi Mariyani; Anisa Prastiwi; Ragil Putri Hari Kartini
Global Education Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Global Education Journal (GEJ)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/gej.1400

Abstract

The shifting dynamics of global democracy have positioned civic education as a crucial pillar in shaping the civic engagement of the younger generation. This research aims to investigate the forms and causes of civic deficit among high school students in the context of constitutional political education. Using a qualitative approach with a case study design at SMA Negeri 1 Rejoso, Nganjuk, data was collected thru in-depth interviews with 4 Civics teachers and 30 students from class X, as well as document analysis of syllabi, lesson plans, and textbooks. Thematic analysis techniques were used to identify patterns in learning experiences, perceptions, and practices. The findings indicate that the civic deficit is not only rooted in students' lack of interest in political issues, but is also fueled by structural conditions within the education system, including pedagogical stagnation due to administrative pressure and inadequate welfare for contract teachers. Civics education tends to be monological, normative, and lacks local contextualization, leading to political alienation among students. Teaching materials that are merely an administrative formality reinforce this alienation. A curriculum unsupported by a well-being ecosystem and fair teacher distribution fails to create deliberative space in the classroom.
FROM REGULATION TO LIABILITY: CHANGING DATA PRIVACY LANDSCAPE IN THE DIGITAL AGE Rengga Yudha Santoso; Yohana Rosita Dewi Mariyani
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS (INJOSER)
Publisher : Adisam Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid digital transformation has turned data privacy into a global strategic issue. Regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provide a comprehensive legal framework for the protection of personal data, but their effectiveness depends heavily on the ability of organizations to apply the principles of accountability and substantive responsibility. This research aims to analyze the paradigm shift from regulatory compliance (regulation-based) to organizational accountability (responsibility-based) in data privacy governance in the digital era. The approach used is qualitative with a systematic literature study method, reviewing Scopus-indexed scientific articles and the Web of Science published between 2015–2025, as well as policy reports from international institutions such as the OECD and EDPB. The analysis was carried out using thematic analysis techniques to identify the main patterns in the application of the principles of accountability, privacy by design, data protection impact assessment (DPIA), as well as social context and privacy ethics. The results show that the paradigm shift towards responsibility requires organizations not only to comply with formal regulations, but also to build an internal governance system that is able to proactively prove data protection. Mechanisms such as privacy by design and DPIA have proven effective in increasing transparency, risk mitigation, and public trust. In addition, the theory of Contextual Integrity and the Taxonomy of Privacy assert that privacy protection must consider social norms and ethical values, not just legal aspects. In the context of developing countries, including Indonesia, the implementation of privacy responsibilities still faces challenges such as limited institutional capacity, low digital literacy, and policy fragmentation. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen independent supervisory institutions, increase public literacy, and integrate accountability principles in business strategies and technology design. This research confirms that the future of data protection lies in the balance between strong regulation and ethical responsibility of organizations. By internalizing the principles of accountability, organizations can build a transparent, ethical, and sustainable data ecosystem, while strengthening public trust in the digital age.
Analisis Yuridis Operasionalisasi Pasal 38–39 UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 dalam Paradigma Therapeutic Justice dan Urgensi Pendirian Mental Health Courts Basuki, Teguh; Mariyani, Yohana Rosita Dewi
Jurnal de jure Vol 18, No 1 (2026): Jurnal De Jure
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Balikpapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36277/jurnaldejure.v18i1.1232

Abstract

Paradigma pemidanaan retributif dalam hukum pidana klasik menimbulkan persoalan serius ketika diterapkan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana dengan gangguan jiwa. Pemenjaraan terhadap individu yang mengalami gangguan kognitif atau volisional tidak hanya mengabaikan prinsip pertanggungjawaban pidana, tetapi juga berdampak anti-terapeutik serta berpotensi meningkatkan residivisme. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP Nasional) menandai pergeseran paradigma melalui penerapan sistem dua jalur (dual-track system), khususnya melalui Pasal 38 dan 39 yang membedakan pidana dan tindakan (maatregel). Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis operasionalisasi Pasal 38–39 UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 dalam kerangka Therapeutic Justice, serta menilai urgensi pembentukan Mental Health Courts sebagai model peradilan khusus bagi pelaku gangguan jiwa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Pasal 39 memberikan dasar normatif bagi penerapan tindakan berupa perawatan medis dan rehabilitasi, ketentuan tersebut masih bersifat “norma pasif” karena ketiadaan mekanisme eksekusi, pengawasan, dan evaluasi yudisial berkelanjutan. Kondisi ini berpotensi menimbulkan dilema perlindungan hak asasi manusia ganda, yakni pelanggaran hak atas kesehatan pelaku dan hak atas keamanan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pembentukan Mental Health Courts merupakan kebutuhan mendesak untuk mengoperasionalkan sanksi tindakan secara terapeutik, akuntabel, dan berorientasi pada keseimbangan antara pemulihan pelaku dan perlindungan publik.