Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ekonomi Syariah, Perbankan, Hukum, dan Sistem
Walim, Dr
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
DIALECTIC OF LEGAL THEORY IN CIVIL CASE DECISIONS FOUR COURT DECISIONS IN THE TANGERANG JURISDICTION FOR THE 2023-2025 PERIOD Walim, Dr; Sarmadi, Ahmad; Susilo, Agung; Wahyudi, Uway
Ekonomi Syariah : Perbankan, Hukum & Sistem Vol 4 No 7 (2026): Ekossistem Vol 4 No. 7 (April 2026)
Publisher : Yasi Learning Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17605/kv483w20

Abstract

It is not uncommon to encounter a synthesis within a new legal theory. This study analyzes four court decisions within the Tangerang jurisdiction, consisting of one court determination and three divorce rulings, using the framework of progressive legal theory, legal system theory, and the theory of justice. The objective of this research is to examine how these legal theories are reflected in judicial considerations and the consistency in the application of legal principles in similar cases. The research method employs a normative juridical approach with a qualitative analysis of the decisions of the Tangerang District Court Number 1333/Pdt.P/2025/PN.TNG, Number 926/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Tng, Number 1074/Pdt.G/2025/PN Tng, and the Tangerang Religious Court Number 1654/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Tng. The findings indicate that judges do not merely apply the law positivistically, but also consider values of justice, utility, and responsiveness to the needs of society. However, a disparity in approaches was found in assessing the weight of evidence, which has implications for whether a claim is granted or rejected. This study recommends the need for harmonization of judges' understanding regarding the theory of evidence and the principle of substantive justice.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA TANGERANG NOMOR 1654/PDT.G/2025/PA.TNG TENTANG CERAI TALAK DENGAN KESEPAKATAN MEDIASI Walim, Dr; Sarmadi, Ahmad
Ekonomi Syariah : Perbankan, Hukum & Sistem Vol 4 No 8 (2026): Ekossistem Vol 4 No. 8 (Agustus 2026)
Publisher : Yasi Learning Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17605/n91vgk66

Abstract

Proses penyelesaian perkara perceraian tidak hanya menyangkut putusnya ikatan perkawinan, tetapi juga berdampak pada hak-hak keperdataan. Penelitian ini menganalisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tangerang Nomor 1654/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Tng yang mengabulkan permohonan cerai talak dengan adanya kesepakatan mediasi antara Pemohon dan Termohon mengenai hak-hak pasca perceraian. Fokus penelitian adalah pada keabsahan kesepakatan mediasi yang berhasil sebagian, pertimbangan hukum hakim, serta implikasi yuridis dari penetapan kesepakatan tersebut dalam putusan. Metode penelitian menggunakan yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan analisis kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hakim telah mempertimbangkan secara cermat syarat formil dan materiil kesepakatan mediasi sesuai Pasal 1320 dan 1337 KUHPerdata, serta mengintegrasikannya ke dalam amar putusan. Kesepakatan tersebut mengikat para pihak dan memiliki kekuatan hukum eksekutorial. Putusan ini mencerminkan upaya pengadilan untuk menyelesaikan perkara perceraian secara komprehensif dengan memperhatikan kepentingan kedua belah pihak dan anak-anak.
FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL ERROR DALAM PENGGUNAAN PASAL YANG TIDAK ADA PADA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HUKUM Sarmadi, Ahmad; Walim, Dr
Ekonomi Syariah : Perbankan, Hukum & Sistem Vol 4 No 8 (2026): Ekossistem Vol 4 No. 8 (Agustus 2026)
Publisher : Yasi Learning Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17605/d90zp446

Abstract

This study examines fundamental legal error (fundamental legal error) arising from the use of nonexistent statutory provisions in State Administrative Court (PTUN) proceedings, analyzed through the lens of legal philosophy. Employing a normative legal method with conceptual, statutory, and philosophical approaches, the research finds that such errors violate the principle of legality, undermine legal certainty, and erode procedural justice. The invocation of nonexistent norms constitutes a jurisdictional overreach that renders judicial decisions legally defective and philosophically illegitimate. From a legal philosophy perspective, this error offends the ideals of justice and the rule of law, necessitating judicial vigilance and corrective measures to uphold the integrity of administrative adjudication.
Co-Authors Sarmadi, Ahmad Susilo, Agung Wahyudi, Uway