Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Decoding Marxist Themes in A Bug's Life: A Study of Power, Exploitation, and Class Struggle Johanes, Cayla Abielle; Miarso, Jessie Queen; Martin, Violet Ayuwandira Larasati
Jurnal Pendidikan Makarios Vol 3 No 2 (2026): BOANERGES
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Gereja Masehi Advent Hari Ketujuh Makarios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to deep dive into the issues of class struggle, exploitation, and power, shown in the 1998 Pixar movie, “A Bug’s Life”, through the lens of Marxism theory. This analysis was conducted using the Marxist perspective from the book Das Capital, Volume I (1990) by Karl Marx. By using a qualitative close reading method, the data were collected through the deep observation of the cinematography and themes present, repeated viewing of scenes and narratives, plot and storyline reading based on the Marxism concepts to strengthen the arguments. Hence the findings show: 1) Symbolic Representation of Classes: The grasshoppers symbolize the bourgeoisie, or ruling class, which exploits the ants, representing the proletariat or working class, by taking their production without contributing to it, mirroring Marx's concept of workers being bound by "invisible threads" and working out of necessity for survival This exploitation is maintained through psychological control and fear, rather than overt physical force 2) Initial Acceptance of Oppression: The ants initially accept and believe that their oppression is the "natural order" of things before their class consciousness emerges, leading them to unite. This reflects the Marxist idea that those in power make workers believe the exploitative system is normal and necessary. The ants' fear and perceived powerlessness keep them obedient, despite their numerical superiority. 3) Empowerment through Collective Action: Once united and realizing they have nothing to lose, their group solidarity empowers them to overthrow the unnatural and exploitative system, aligning with Marx's view that the proletariat gains power through collective strength. The film highlights how fear sustains power and a rigid social hierarchy. However, achieving class consciousness enables collective action to dismantle this oppression. The main objective of this research is to uncover the themes in the story whilst making them understandable, and for readers to comprehend and to be aware of the importance of knowing social issues in movies.
The Consequences of Preparation and Impulsivity in The Three Little Pigs Suawah, Belinda Angela; Wola, Fristo Timothy; Miarso, John Prince; Miarso, Jessie Queen; Siregar, Theofanny Gracia
Jurnal Pendidikan Makarios Vol 3 No 2 (2026): BOANERGES
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Gereja Masehi Advent Hari Ketujuh Makarios

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzed The Three Little Pigs through the theoretical framework of Maria Tatar’s Moral Development Theory (2009), identifying the consequences of preparation vs. impulsivity, the value of preparation for young audiences, and the role of a narrative device in testing preparedness and impulsivity. The story focuses on the three pigs, who moved out from their parents house to build their own, then the Big Bad Wolf destroyed the first two pig’s houses that were made of sticks and straws, but when it comes to the third pig’s house, the wolf could not destroy it because it was made of stones. The finding reveals: 1) Preparation leads the third pig to safety and success, meanwhile the first two pigs have to experience the consequences of impulsivity which is the wolf’s attack. This outcome demonstrates the moral lesson of the tale: the importance of foresight, diligence, and hard work. The story highlights how careful preparation and effort lead to security and success, while impulsivity and shortcuts result in vulnerability and failure. 2) The narrative’s outcome shows the importance of preparation and how impulsivity can lead to negative consequences. The first two pigs were rushing to construct their homes which resulted in their houses getting destroyed. Meanwhile, the third pig was patient and didn’t rush things which led to the house being safe from the wolf. 3) The big bad wolf serves as a narrative device to test the resilience of the three little pigs’ houses, figuring out who is the best at planning to build.