Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa (JURRIBAH) Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Rahma Delviani
Unknown Affiliation
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Struktur Klausa dan Hubungan Sintaktis dalam Artikel Argumentatif di Website Badan Bahasa Edisi 2025 Bagas Cahyadi; Cicha Kartikha Sri Mulyani; Era Nur'aini; Esa Futuh Handa; Rahma Delviani; Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo; Noviani Achmad Putri; Khanifa Kinanthi Aulina
Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan  Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April: Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Periset Bahasa Sastra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/pragmatik.v4i2.2589

Abstract

This study examines clause structures and syntactic relations in argumentative articles published on the 2025 edition of the Badan Bahasa website. As a communication tool, language plays a crucial role in conveying ideas and shaping logical reasoning, particularly in argumentative texts that require a high degree of cohesion and coherence. The research aims to describe the patterns of clause structure and interclausal syntactic relations used in these articles to understand how linguistic constructions influence argumentative strength. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach with the distributional method, the study relies on internal linguistic elements as analytical instruments. The findings show that the articles generally employ single clauses with S–P–Pelengkap patterns as well as complex clauses expressing causation, alongside syntactic relations that include coordination and subordination, including causal, contrastive, purposive, and additive relations. These patterns indicate consistent application of Indonesian syntactic rules, although some repetitive tendencies appear in the use of active clauses and multi-layered complex sentence structures. The study highlights the importance of mastering clause structure in constructing logical, persuasive argumentative texts, and the findings are expected to serve as a reference for writers and language institutions to improve academic writing quality and enrich linguistic studies in digital contexts.
Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Asertif dalam Pernyataan Klarifikasi Figur Publik Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual di Media Sosial Endah Sawitri; Eqy Wahyu Ramadhani; Putri Rahma Nurjannah; Rahma Delviani; Sevia Amartha Putri; Yasmina Zalfa; Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo; Nancy Angelia Purba
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Agustus : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa
Publisher : Pusat riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurribah.v5i2.9629

Abstract

Public figure clarifications on social media have become a complex space for truth contestation in digital society. This research is motivated by the strategic use of linguistic devices by public figures to restore their image and construct a narrative of truth following digital conflicts. The purpose of this study is to identify and describe the various functions of assertive illocutionary speech acts used by Mohan Hazian, Panji Sukma, and Roby Tremonti in their clarification videos. The method used is descriptive qualitative with a pragmatic approach. Data were collected using listening and note-taking techniques, then analyzed based on Searle's speech act taxonomy. The results of the study revealed 45 data points of assertive speech acts divided into eight functions, namely stating, denying, reporting, assessing, emphasizing, admitting, claiming, and complaining. The functions of stating and denying are the most dominant as instruments of self-defense. These findings prove that speakers combine logical facts with emotional aspects to regain public trust. The benefit of this research is to provide a theoretical contribution to the development of pragmatic studies regarding crisis communication strategies in digital media and to serve as a guide for the public to be more critical in dissecting the intent behind public figure clarifications.
Co-Authors Asep Purwo Yudi Utomo Bagas Cahyadi Cicha Kartikha Sri Mulyani Endah Sawitri Eqy Wahyu Ramadhani Era Nur'aini Esa Futuh Handa Khanifa Kinanthi Aulina Nancy Angelia Purba Noviani Achmad Putri Putri Rahma Nurjannah Sevia Amartha Putri Yasmina Zalfa