Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir
Muhammad Nurul Widad
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
From Sectarianism to Scientific Naturalism? Rethinking Madhhab-Based Differences in the Exegesis of Q.S. Al-Maidah: 6 Muhammad Nurul Widad; Fadhil Achmad Agus Bahari; Isyak Isyak; Moh. Ikhya Ulumuddin Al Hikam
Ulumul Qur'an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Ulumul Qur'an: March 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Al-Quran dan Tafsir STIU Darul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58404/uq.v6i1.703

Abstract

This study examines the interpretive differences in classical Quranic legal exegesis, which are often perceived as expressions of sectarian bias. Focusing on the interpretation of Q.S. al-Maidah [5]:6, the article aims to reassess whether madhhab-based differences reflect ideological division or epistemic variation. Using a qualitative, library-based approach, this study analyzes four major works of Ahkam al-Quran—by al-Jassas (Hanafi), al-Kiya al-Harrasi (Shafii), Ibn al-Arabi (Maliki), and Ibn al-Jawzi (Hanbali). The analysis employs Ibn Taymiyyah’s framework of Ikhtilaf al-Mufassirin to classify types of interpretive differences, complemented by a discursive perspective inspired by power-knowledge analysis. The findings show that most differences among the exegetes fall within ikhtilaf tanawwu (legitimate variation), rather than contradiction. These variations arise from linguistic interpretation, juristic reasoning, and methodological commitments, not from sectarian motives. This study argues that such diversity can be understood as a scientific naturalism of tafsir, in which interpretive plurality emerges naturally from the internal dynamics of the Quranic text and the intellectual frameworks of the mufasir. This perspective contributes to Quranic studies by reframing madhhab-based differences as a form of disciplined epistemic diversity rather than ideological conflict, thereby offering a more balanced understanding of classical tafsir.
Co-Authors Fadhil Achmad Agus Bahari Isyak Isyak Moh. Ikhya Ulumuddin Al Hikam