Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik
Romadu Novelino
Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Policy on Allocating Resources for Pertalite Subsidies: Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency Analysis Safira Widya Attidhira; Meni Apriani; Romadu Novelino; Jaka Tiwana Alfianda; Faisal Santiago
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2026): Jurnal pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v13i1.48866

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal and political efficiency of the 2024 Pertalite subsidy policy from a legal and economic perspective based on the Kaldor Hicks efficiency principle. The results show that the Pertalite subsidy policy has not fully achieved economic and legal efficiency, as reflected in the negative net social benefits ranging from IDR 8–18 trillion per year. This condition indicates that the resulting social benefits have not exceeded the social costs borne by the state and society. The observed inefficiency is mainly caused by inaccuracies in targeting subsidy recipients, limited data integration between institutions, and a suboptimal legal framework governing the protection and management of digital data in the subsidy distribution system. From a normative perspective, the Pertalite subsidy policy also requires further strengthening to be more aligned with the principles of efficient and fair economic resource management as mandated by Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
A Comparative Study of Restorative Justice in Criminal Law Enforcement in Common Law and Civil Law Countries and Its Implications for Indonesian Legal Reform Romadu Novelino; Azis Budianto
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (November 2025 - Januari 2026)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v3i4.539

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the application of restorative justice in the criminal legal systems of Common Law and Civil Law countries, and examine its implications for criminal law reform in Indonesia. The restorative justice paradigm emerged as an alternative to the retributive justice system, which has focused on punishing the perpetrator rather than restoring the victim and the community. Using a normative-comparative juridical approach, this study examines various restorative justice practices in the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand, representing Common Law, and the Netherlands, France, and Indonesia, representing Civil Law. The analysis shows that the Common Law system is more adaptive and provides broad discretion to law enforcement officials to implement restorative-based solutions, while the Civil Law system tends to be more bound by a legalistic framework and requires firm legal regulations before implementation. Nevertheless, both systems show the same direction towards a more humanistic and participatory law enforcement. In the Indonesian context, the application of restorative justice needs to be strengthened through the harmonization of laws and regulations, increasing the capacity of law enforcement officials, and establishing an integrated penal mediation institution. These findings confirm that national criminal law reform should adopt a hybrid approach that combines the flexibility of Common Law with the legal certainty of Civil Law to create a criminal justice system that is socially just and restorative.
Co-Authors Azis Budianto Faisal Santiago Jaka Tiwana Alfianda Meni Apriani Safira Widya Attidhira