Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.048
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Jurnal Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Ria Anggraeni Utami
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bengkulu
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Pidana Kerja Sosial sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan dalam Perspektif Penologi dan Sistem Penitensier Indonesia Uci Febriani; Bella Ananda Sari; Muhammad Edwar; Ria Anggraeni Utami
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine community service punishment as an alternative sentencing in the perspective of penology and the Indonesian penitentiary system and to analyze the legal position of community service punishment within the Indonesian criminal sentencing system under the new Criminal Code. This research uses a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The data used are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The results show that community service punishment in the new Criminal Code has the position as a principal punishment that serves as an alternative to short-term imprisonment and fines and is categorized as a non-custodial sentence. From the perspective of penology, community service punishment reflects rehabilitative, reintegrative, and restorative justice-oriented sentencing. In the correctional system, community service punishment can be a solution to prison overcrowding and supports the correctional objective of rehabilitation and social reintegration of offenders. However, its implementation still requires technical regulations, supervision mechanisms, and institutional readiness to ensure effective application within the Indonesian criminal justice system.
Urgensi Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam Mengurangi Overkapasitas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Rina Iswani S; Najwa Renanda Lheviola; Nabilla tiffany dwinov; Bagas Prithajaya Putra; Ria Anggraeni Utami
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.5797

Abstract

Permasalahan overkapasitas lembaga pemasyarakatan di Indonesia telah menjadi isu krusial dalam sistem peradilan pidana, yang berdampak pada menurunnya kualitas pembinaan narapidana serta meningkatnya potensi pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Kondisi ini mendorong perlunya alternatif pemidanaan yang lebih efektif dan humanis, salah satunya melalui penerapan pidana kerja sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi pidana kerja sosial sebagai solusi dalam mengurangi overkapasitas lembaga pemasyarakatan, serta menilai relevansinya dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, serta konsep-konsep pemidanaan modern. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidana kerja sosial memiliki potensi besar sebagai alternatif pidana penjara, khususnya bagi pelaku tindak pidana ringan, karena tidak hanya mengurangi jumlah penghuni lapas, tetapi juga memberikan manfaat sosial serta mendorong reintegrasi pelaku ke dalam masyarakat.
Viktimologi Dalam Kasus Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online Di Indonesia Amanda Putri; Sania Ulfatun Nikmah; Naura Putri Ramadhania; Ria Anggraeni Utami
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of digital technology has given rise to new forms of crime, one of which is online gender-based violence (OGBV), which is increasingly prevalent in Indonesia. This phenomenon demonstrates high vulnerability, particularly for women, as victims in the digital space. This study aims to analyze OGBV from a victimological perspective by highlighting the forms and characteristics of the crime, the vulnerability factors of victims, and available legal protections. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, utilizing secondary data obtained through literature review. The results indicate that OGBV has specific characteristics, such as anonymity, easy spread, and long-term impacts due to digital traces that are difficult to erase. From a victimological perspective, victims experience not only material losses but also serious psychological and social impacts, exacerbated by the phenomena of victim blaming and revictimization. Although Indonesia has regulations in place, the implementation of legal protection for victims of OGBV remains suboptimal. Therefore, a more comprehensive and victim-oriented approach is needed to achieve effective legal protection and justice for victims in the digital era.
From Privacy to Exploitation: A Victimological Analysis of Cases Involving the Non-Consensual Distribution of Intimate Content Yuliani Finaly Putri; Dea Nanda Rahmadani; M Dede Al Farabi Suardi; Denies Salwarani; Ria Anggraeni Utami
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19537062

Abstract

The development of digital technology has made communication easier, but it has also opened up opportunities for new forms of crime, one of which is the non-consensual distribution of intimate content (non-consensual intimate images). This phenomenon is becoming increasingly common and has serious impacts on victims, whether psychologically, socially, or legally. Unfortunately, victims are often blamed, as they are perceived to have contributed to the occurrence of the incident. This study aims to analyze the position of victims in cases of non-consensual dissemination of intimate content using a victimological perspective, particularly through victim typology and modern victimology approaches. The method used is normative juridical, with a conceptual approach and case studies drawn from relevant news reports. The results of the analysis show that the use of classical victimological typologies often has the potential to create bias and reinforce victim blaming, especially in the context of digital crimes. Therefore, a modern victimology approach is considered more relevant, as it places victims as parties who must be protected rather than blamed. In addition, regulations such as the Law on Sexual Violence Crimes have provided a foundation for legal protection, although in practice they still face various challenges
Analisi Normatif Terhadap Kekosongan Pengaturan Pedoman Teknis Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan Seksual Di Indonesia Vina Putri Afisako; Aulia Nafisha Rahma; Riqa Kurnia Sabilla; Khinayla Faradiba Syahnaz; Ria Anggraeni Utami
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital membawa perubahan signifikan terhadap pola kejahatan seksual, khususnya melalui meningkatnya kasus kekerasan berbasis gender online (KBGO) yang meninggalkan jejak elektronik sebagai sumber pembuktian utama. Meskipun Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) dan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS) telah mengakui alat bukti elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah, hingga kini belum tersedia pedoman teknis yang komprehensif untuk mengatur prosedur pengumpulan, penyimpanan, autentikasi, dan verifikasi bukti digital dalam proses peradilan pidana. Kekosongan pengaturan ini menimbulkan ketidakseragaman praktik di tingkat penyidikan dan persidangan, sehingga berpotensi melemahkan nilai pembuktian bukti elektronik dan menimbulkan risiko ketidakpastian hukum. Selain itu, ketiadaan standar teknis turut mengancam perlindungan korban, terutama terkait risiko reviktimisasi, kebocoran data pribadi, serta penyalahgunaan konten sensitif. Melalui pendekatan normatif, artikel ini menganalisis kesenjangan antara pengaturan normatif dan kebutuhan praktik penegakan hukum, serta mengkaji implikasinya terhadap asas kepastian hukum dan perlindungan korban. Artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya penyusunan pedoman teknis nasional yang terintegrasi antar lembaga penegak hukum untuk memastikan keabsahan alat bukti elektronik, melindungi hak korban, dan mewujudkan keadilan substantif dalam perkara kekerasan seksual di era digital.
Saksi Mahkota Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Perspektif Hukum Pembuktian Dan Asas Perlindungan Hak Terdakwa Tiara Okta Yanti; Lidhya Agustini; Bella Syafirda; Dea Eryan Ananda; Ria Anggraeni Utami
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime with broad impacts on state budgets and public trust in officials, requiring efficient evidentiary methods. This study examines the role of crown witnesses in proving corruption crimes from the perspectives of evidentiary law and the protection of defendant rights. A normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches through literature review was applied. The findings indicate that the use of crown witnesses is a legitimate extraordinary evidentiary tool if supported by other evidence and does not violate defendant rights. However, challenges include regulatory ambiguity, potential human rights violations, witness credibility, and witness protection. This study offers normative recommendations to balance evidentiary effectiveness and human rights protection in the criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Amanda Putri Aulia Nafisha Rahma Bagas Prithajaya Putra Bella Ananda Sari Bella Syafirda Dea Eryan Ananda Dea Nanda Rahmadani Denies Salwarani Khinayla Faradiba Syahnaz Lidhya Agustini M Dede Al Farabi Suardi Muhammad Edwar Nabilla tiffany dwinov Najwa Renanda Lheviola Naura Putri Ramadhania Rina Iswani S Riqa Kurnia Sabilla Sania Ulfatun Nikmah Tiara Okta Yanti Uci Febriani Vina Putri Afisako Yuliani Finaly Putri