Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis DEVELOPMENT : Journal of Community Engagement Rechtsvinding journal of social and economic research Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Lulu Syakirah Alatas
Universitas Pamulang
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Hukum Perikatan: Antara Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan Kontraktual Lulu Syakirah Alatas; Nur Sa'adah
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/consensus.v4i3.1809

Abstract

The principle of good faith constitutes one of the fundamental principles in the law of obligations governing the implementation of agreements between parties. Within the Indonesian civil law system, this principle is regulated in the Civil Code, particularly Article 1338 paragraph (3), which stipulates that agreements must be executed in good faith. However, in practice, the application of this principle frequently gives rise to various issues because the concept of good faith is inherently abstract and allows for broad interpretation. This study aims to analyze the regulation of the principle of good faith within the law of obligations and to examine the problems arising from its application in the performance of agreements. This research employs a normative legal research method using both a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings indicate that the principle of good faith plays an important role as a corrective mechanism in contractual relationships to maintain the balance of rights and obligations between the parties. Nevertheless, the lack of clear parameters regarding the application of the principle of good faith may lead to differing interpretations in judicial practice, which in turn affects legal certainty.
The Principle of Good Faith in Policy Execution as the Basis for the Legal Protection of the Insured in Life Insurance Contracts Lulu Syakirah Alatas; Risna Menda Lovinta Siregar
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1802

Abstract

The implementation of life insurance policies often leads to legal disputes concerning the application of the principle of utmost good faith and the legal protection of insured parties. Claim rejections are frequently based on the alleged failure of insured parties to disclose material facts, although insurers are likewise required to provide transparent information, conduct proper risk assessment, and perform contractual obligations in good faith. This study aims to analyze the principle of good faith as the legal foundation for protecting insured parties in the implementation of life insurance policies and to examine its role in resolving insurance disputes. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the Indonesian Civil Code, the Indonesian Commercial Code, Law Number 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance, and relevant court decisions, supported by secondary legal materials collected through library research. The materials were analyzed qualitatively using a prescriptive approach. The findings reveal that the principle of good faith creates reciprocal obligations for both insurers and insured parties throughout policy implementation, including disclosure of material facts, professional underwriting, transparent policy formulation, and objective claim assessment. The study concludes that consistent application of this principle strengthens legal certainty, promotes balanced contractual relationships, and enhances legal protection for insured parties in life insurance practice.
KEBIJAKAN PEMBATASAN USIA MEDIA SOSIAL SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DI ERA DIGITAL Lulu Syakirah Alatas; Abdul Hadi; Adithya Tri Firmansyah R
DEVELOPMENT: Journal of Community Engagement Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Juni
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/x2fv6v89

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital technology has increased social media use among adolescents, creating various challenges related to online safety, privacy, and exposure to inappropriate content. This community service activity aimed to enhance students’ understanding of social media age-restriction policies and strengthen their awareness of child protection in digital environments. The program was conducted at MAN 4 South Jakarta through legal counseling and digital literacy education using lectures, audiovisual presentations, interactive discussions, and question-and-answer sessions. The activity focused on introducing the provisions of the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Digital Number 9 of 2026 concerning child protection in digital spaces, as well as the risks associated with irresponsible social media use. The results indicate that students demonstrated improved knowledge regarding age limitations for social media access, digital rights and responsibilities, privacy protection, and the potential impacts of cyberbullying and misinformation. Active participation during discussions also reflected growing awareness of the importance of responsible digital behavior. The program contributed to strengthening legal awareness and digital literacy among students, supporting broader efforts to create a safer and more child-friendly digital environment.
ANALISIS HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT DALAM PRAKTIK PERSEKONGKOLAN TENDER STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN KPPU (NOMOR: 35/KPPU-I/2020) Lulu Syakirah Alatas
Journal of Social and Economics Research Vol 7 No 2 (2025): JSER, December 2025
Publisher : Ikatan Dosen Menulis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/jser.v7i2.1210

Abstract

Terjadinya kegiatan yang mengakibatkan persaingan tidak sehat yang terus terjadi menggambarkan Undang-Undang anti Monopoli dan KPPU tidak membuat kelompok maupun pelaku usaha tunduk dengan aturan yang ada. Hal inilah yang menjadi latar belakang penulis untuk mengangkat dan menganalisis tesis. Adapun rumusan masalah: Bagaimana Kedudukan Hukum Panitia Tender Dalam Putusan KPPU tentang Persekongkolan Tender Apakah Putusan KPPU Pada Perkara Nomor 35/KPPU-I/2020 Sudah Sesuai Dengan Teori Tujuan Hukum. Kedudukan panitia tender yang terlibat kasus persekongkolan tidak bisa dilaksanakan penegakan hukumnya oleh KPPU. Karena dalam hal ini KPPU tidak mempunyai tugas dan wewenang untuk memeriksa panitia tender. KPPU hanya mempunyai tugas dan wewenang untuk memeriksa para pelaku usaha dan memberi rekomendasi kepada pejabat Pembina kepegawaian jika panitia terbukti secara meyakinkan melakukan persekongkolan tender. Berdasarkan Putusan KPPU dengan perkara nomor 35/KPPU-I/2020 tentang persekongkolan tender maka penulis berpendapart bahwa putusan tersebut sudah sesuai dengan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang no 5 tahun 1996 dimana dalam perkara tersebut Majelis Komisi meyakinkan telah terpenuhinya unsur-unsur persekongkolan tender yaitu Unsur Pelaku Usaha, Unsur Pelaku Usaha Lain dan atau Pihak yang terkait dengan Pelaku Usaha Lain,Unsur Bersekongkol untuk Mengatur atau Menentukan Pemenang Tender, Unsur Dapat Mengakibatkan Terjadinya Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Adapun jika dikaitkan dengan teori tujuan hukum maka putusan tersebut telah memenuhi tiga bagian dari teori tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan hukum, kemanfaatan hukum dan kepastian hukum kecuali putusan untuk pihak lain yaitu Terlapor III dalam hal ini selaku panitia tender yaitu Kelompok Kerja Konstruksi Tim 51 (Pokja 51) ULP Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat, Biro Administrasi Pembangunan dan Layanan Pengadaan Barang atau Jasa Pemerintah. Dimana Majelis Komisi dalam memberi hanya memberi rekomendasi putusan.
Konstruksi Wanprestasi dalam Perikatan Digital: Analisis Kekosongan Norma dan Model Digital Contractual Liability dalam Ekosistem Fintech di Indonesia Lulu Syakirah Alatas; Annisaul Malamah; Rizky Dwi Pradana
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 4 (2026): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i4.3529

Abstract

The development of financial technology (fintech) has shifted contractual relationships from bilateral to multi-party digital arrangements. This transformation raises new issues in understanding breach of contract, which can no longer be fully explained by classical contract law. The involvement of digital platforms as intermediaries adds complexity, particularly in determining liability and evidentiary aspects. This study aims to examine the construction of breach of contract in digital relationships and to identify normative gaps in Indonesian contract law. It uses a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that the legal framework does not adequately regulate platform liability and still faces weaknesses in electronic evidence. Therefore, a reconstruction of contract law through a more adaptive digital contractual liability concept is necessary.
Co-Authors Abdul Hadi Adithya Tri Firmansyah R Annisaul Malamah Nur Sa'adah Risna Menda Lovinta Siregar Rizky Dwi Pradana