Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Urgency of Establishing Joint Operational Guidelines Between the Police and the National Narcotics Agency to Prevent Duplication of Efforts in Narcotics Investigation Andin Wisnu Sudibyo; Suparno Suparno
Journal Of Social Science (JoSS) Vol 4 No 6 (2025): JOSS: Journal of Social Science
Publisher : Al-Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/joss.v4i6.470

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the authority of the National Police and the National Narcotics Agency (BNN) to investigate narcotics crimes, as well as the legal implications of the overlapping authority between the two institutions. Using the normative legal method and the statute approach, this study examines the provisions of Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police and Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, as well as other related regulations. A conceptual approach is also applied to explore the legal theory underlying the authority of investigators and the potential for conflict of authority in investigative practices. This study found that overlapping authority can lead to legal uncertainty, human rights violations, and ineffectiveness in the investigation process. Therefore, it is necessary to harmonize regulations, establish joint operational guidelines, and strengthen coordination between the National Police and BNN to prevent conflicts of authority and increase the effectiveness of narcotics law enforcement in Indonesia.
Dynamics of the South China Sea Dispute: Indonesia’s Position in Multilateral Diplomacy and the Enforcement of UNCLOS 1982 Andin Wisnu Sudibyo; Richard
al-Battar: Jurnal Pamungkas Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/al-battar.v2i3.435

Abstract

The South China Sea constitutes a strategically significant global region due to its vital role in international trade, natural resource potential, and regional geopolitical stability; however, it also remains a complex maritime dispute area arising from overlapping claims by several states, particularly China’s unilateral nine-dash line claim, which is inconsistent with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982. Although Indonesia is not a direct claimant state, it possesses substantial strategic interests in safeguarding sovereignty, maritime security, and legal certainty under international law, especially with regard to its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the North Natuna Sea. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of the South China Sea dispute from an international law perspective by focusing on Indonesia’s position in multilateral diplomacy and the enforcement of UNCLOS 1982. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical method, this research is based on doctrinal legal analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including UNCLOS 1982, the 2016 arbitral award in Philippines v. China, official ASEAN documents, and contemporary scholarly literature. The findings indicate that while UNCLOS 1982 provides a clear and binding legal framework for maritime dispute settlement, its implementation faces significant challenges due to political considerations and geopolitical power dynamics. Indonesia consistently emphasizes the primacy of international law, strengthens multilateral diplomacy through ASEAN, and actively promotes the establishment of a legally binding Code of Conduct, thereby affirming its role as a normative actor contributing to regional stability and the enforcement of the international law of the sea.
Penataan Ulang Sistem Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional Yang Berkeadilan dan Humanis Andin Wisnu Sudibyo; Zainal Arifin Hoesein
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 03 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i03.1568

Abstract

Penanggulangan tindak pidana terorisme di Indonesia hingga saat ini masih didominasi oleh pendekatan represif yang mengedepankan aspek keamanan nasional, namun sering kali mengabaikan perlindungan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana terorisme. Padahal, sebagai bagian dari negara hukum, perlakuan terhadap setiap individu—termasuk pelaku kejahatan luar biasa seperti terorisme—harus tetap didasarkan pada prinsip keadilan, penghormatan hak asasi manusia, dan perlakuan yang manusiawi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bentuk dan kelemahan perlindungan hukum terhadap pelaku terorisme dalam sistem hukum positif Indonesia serta merumuskan bentuk penataan ulang sistem perlindungan hukum yang lebih adil dan humanis. Menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 belum sepenuhnya menjamin hak-hak hukum pelaku terorisme, terutama terkait bantuan hukum dan perlakuan selama proses hukum. Ketidaksesuaian dengan KUHAP dan instrumen HAM internasional menimbulkan praktik pelanggaran HAM dan melemahkan proses deradikalisasi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan rekonstruksi hukum yang menyeluruh guna menciptakan keseimbangan antara keamanan nasional dan keadilan hukum yang menjunjung tinggi hak asasi manusia.
Legal Reconstruction of the Police Code of Ethics in Strengthening Sanctions against Members Involved in Narcotics Abuse Andin Wisnu Sudibyo; Faisal Santiago
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i6.1823

Abstract

Background. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deepfake technology, has greatly influenced society by enabling the creation of fake pornographic content. This phenomenon threatens privacy, reputation, and mental well-being. In Indonesia, laws addressing pornography and electronic crimes exist but are inadequate to manage AI-driven crimes such as deepfake pornography. The absence of specific legal frameworks poses challenges to effectively tackling these issues. Purpose. This study aims to examine the inadequacies of current Indonesian regulations in dealing with deepfake pornography and propose a legal reconstruction of the Police Code of Ethics to strengthen sanctions against perpetrators. The research also explores ways to balance strict legal measures with the encouragement of beneficial technological advancements. Method. A qualitative research method was employed, involving a review of legal documents, regulations, and case studies related to deepfake pornography and AI-related crimes. Comparative analysis with other countries’ laws was conducted to identify best practices. Results. The findings reveal gaps in the Indonesian legal framework for addressing AI-related crimes. Recommendations include the formulation of new regulations that specifically address deepfake technology, stronger sanctions, and the integration of ethical AI use in law enforcement practices. Conclusion. Responsive legal frameworks that regulate AI use and strengthen sanctions are essential for protecting individuals and enhancing law enforcement. This ensures that technological innovations serve societal benefits without causing harm.