Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Post Truth Society dan Literasi Digital: Analisis Peran Mafindo Dalam Melawan Hoaks, Diisinformasi dan Misinformasi di Indonesia Edi Nurwahyu Julianto; Inadia Aristyavan; Mira Natalia Pellu; Suci Rahmah YF; Bagus Sudarmanto
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : CV Putra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58540/jipsi.v5i1.1508

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran Mafindo (Masyarakat Anti Fitnah Indonesia) dalam upaya melawan hoaks, disinformasi, dan misinformasi di era post-truth di Indonesia. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan metode analisis konten, penelitian ini mengkaji 10 konten Instagram Mafindo (@turnbackhoax.id). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mafindo mengintegrasikan social media Logic (programmability, popularity, connectivity, dan datafication) dengan Literasi Kritis Digital untuk usaha membongkar narasi hoaks, meningkatkan kesadaran publik, dan mempromosikan verifikasi fakta berbasis bukti. Meski telah memenuhi prinsip logika media sosial, posting Mafindo masih mempunyai tingkat keterlibatan yang rendah. Posting kurang menarik perhatian dan interaksi dari pengguna. Tantangan utama dalam melawan disinformasi tidak hanya terletak pada ketersediaan informasi yang benar, tetapi juga pada kemampuan menyajikannya secara menarik dan relevan dalam lanskap media sosial yang sangat kompetitif. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa fakta kebenaran yang di bagikan oleh Mafindo masih kurang dapat bersaing secara efektif untuk memperoleh keterlibatan khalayak di ruang publik digital.
Political Communication and Digital Diplomacy Through Narrative Strategy in The Issue of Tariff Wars: Framing Analysis of Social Media Posts the Governments of America, China and Germany Inadia Aristyavani; Edi Nurwahyu Julianto; Suci Rahmah YF; Mira Natalia Pellu; Prasetya Yoga Santoso
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): April
Publisher : CV Putra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58540/jipsi.v5i1.1509

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the narrative strategies used by the United States, China, and Germany in addressing the tariff war, focusing on the concepts of political communication, narrative strategy, and soft power. Political communication functions as a tool to shape public perception through the messages conveyed by political actors. Narrative strategy is used to frame the issue of the tariff war according to each country's political interests, while soft power relates to efforts to influence other countries through attraction and legitimacy rather than military power. The study employs a framing analysis method with purposive sampling, analyzing social media posts from four Twitter accounts representing the United States (President, VP), China (Ministry of Foreign Affairs), and Germany (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) during the period from April 3 to 10, 2025. The results show that the United States (U.S) frames the tariff war as a response to domestic economic issues, emphasizing economic independence and nationalism. Meanwhile, China frames the U.S. tariff policy as a violation of the multilateral trade system based on rules, focusing on resisting unilateralism. On the other hand, Germany emphasizes diplomacy and negotiation as a more rational and balanced solution. These differences in framing reflect the national interests and narrative strategies employed by each country to influence global public opinion through soft power. This study provides insights into how narrative strategies and framing can shape international public perception and influence global trade policies.