Tata Eliestiana Dyah A
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Rekonstruksi Historis Relasi Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia: Analisis Komparatif Perspektif Barat dan Islam Jamaludin Jamaludin; Tata Eliestiana Dyah A; Andi Mulyan
Human Rights et Justicia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Human Rights et Justicia
Publisher : Yayasan Abdurrauf Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70742/hrj.v1i2.586

Abstract

Human rights are fundamental rights inherent in every individual and constitute a core element of the rule of law. However, despite their formal recognition within the Indonesian legal system, persistent human rights violations continue to occur, indicating a gap between legal norms and their practical enforcement. In addition, existing studies on human rights in Indonesia tend to be partial, as they often examine either Western legal perspectives or Islamic perspectives separately, without integrating them within a comprehensive historical framework. This study aims to reconstruct the historical relationship between law and human rights in Indonesia through a comparative analysis of Western and Islamic perspectives. This research employs normative legal methods using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. The findings reveal that the development of human rights in Indonesia is shaped by the interaction between Western legal traditions rooted in natural law theory and Islamic traditions based on divine values. Although these perspectives differ in their philosophical foundations, they converge in emphasizing human dignity as a fundamental value. This study contributes by offering an integrative framework that bridges these two traditions in understanding the relationship between law and human rights in Indonesia, and highlights the importance of aligning legal norms, moral values, and law enforcement practices in achieving a substantive rule of law. [Hak asasi manusia merupakan hak-hak mendasar yang melekat pada setiap individu dan merupakan unsur inti dari supremasi hukum. Namun, meskipun telah diakui secara formal dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, pelanggaran hak asasi manusia terus terjadi yang menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara norma-norma hukum dan penegakannya dalam praktik. Selain itu, berbagai studi yang ada mengenai hak asasi manusia di Indonesia cenderung bersifat parsial, karena hanya mengkaji perspektif hukum Barat atau perspektif Islam secara terpisah, tanpa mengintegrasikannya dalam kerangka sejarah yang komprehensif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merekonstruksi hubungan historis antara hukum dan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia melalui analisis komparatif antara perspektif Barat dan Islam. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis, konseptual, dan historis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perkembangan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia dipengaruhi oleh hubungan antara tradisi hukum Barat yang berakar pada teori hukum alam dan tradisi Islam yang didasarkan pada nilai-nilai ilahi. Meskipun kedua perspektif ini memiliki landasan filosofis yang berbeda, keduanya memiliki kesamaan dalam menekankan martabat manusia sebagai nilai fundamental. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi dengan menawarkan kerangka integratif yang menjembatani kedua tradisi tersebut dalam memahami hubungan antara hukum dan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia, serta menegaskan pentingnya menyelaraskan norma-norma hukum, nilai-nilai moral, dan praktik penegakan hukum dalam mewujudkan supremasi hukum yang substantif.]
PRINSIP-PRINSIP HUKUM DAN BENTUK PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONTRAK DAGANG INTERNASIONAL Tata Eliestiana Dyah A; Jamaludin Jamaludin
RETORIKA: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Retorika: Journal of Law, Social, and Humanities
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69503/retorika.v3i1.1552

Abstract

Abstract International business contracts regulate the legal relations of parties across countries within different legal systems, potentially creating legal uncertainty if not carefully formulated. The existence of a choice of law clause is a crucial element in international trade contracts to ensure legal certainty, provide protection for the parties, and prevent future disputes. This study aims to analyze the legal principles underlying international trade contracts and examine the dispute resolution mechanisms used in international business contract practice. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collection of legal materials was carried out through literature studies, with legal material analysis using the legal interpretation method. The research findings show that the principles of international commercial contract law, including party autonomy, choice of law, and good faith, serve as the foundation for ensuring legal certainty and balancing the interests of parties across jurisdictions. Supporting principles such as lex loci contractus, real connection, and separability clauses ensure legal enforceability when the choice of law is unclear or the contract is disputed. In dispute resolution practice, litigation and ADR mechanisms are strategically applied, with arbitration occupying a primary role due to its final, binding, and easily enforceable cross-border nature, while mediation and other forms of ADR serve as cooperative mechanisms to maintain business relationships. The integration of these principles with dispute resolution mechanisms underscores the importance of legal norm harmonization and contractual efficiency in international commercial transactions.