Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM
Ardelia Lananda
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
HUBUNGAN TINGKAT PEMAHAMAN KRIMINOLOGI DASAR DENGAN PEMBENTUKAN KARAKTER PATUH HUKUM PADA SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR (STUDI DI SD NEGERI CINTARESMI) Ardelia Lananda; Kuswandi
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v6i2.601

Abstract

Early childhood legal education plays a crucial role in shaping students' character to adhere to norms and laws. Basic criminological understanding is a form of legal education that needs to be implemented in elementary school students to instill the ability to recognize right and wrong behavior in social life. The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the significant relationship between the level of basic criminological understanding and the formation of law-abiding character in elementary school students at Cintaresmi State Elementary School, as well as to measure the contribution of the level of basic criminological understanding to the formation of law-abiding character in elementary school students at Cintaresmi State Elementary School. The research method used is a quantitative method with an associative approach. Data were obtained through questionnaires that have been tested for validity and reliability, with sample determination using the Slovin formula. Data analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) application. The results of the study indicate a strong, positive, and significant relationship between the level of basic criminological understanding and the formation of law-abiding character in elementary school students. The correlation coefficient value shows a linear and significant relationship, while the results of the determination test show that understanding basic criminology makes a significant contribution to the formation of law-abiding character, so that the higher the level of students' understanding of basic criminology, the better the law-abiding character that is formed.
KETIMPANGAN PENGUASAAN LAHAN SEBAGAI TANTANGAN PERLINDUNGAN PETANI DALAM KERANGKA HUKUM PERTANIAN INDONESIA Saptaning Ruju Paminto; Ardelia Lananda
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v7i1.719

Abstract

Inequality in agricultural land ownership in Indonesia is a structural issue that directly weakens the bargaining position and economic access of smallholder farmers. Although Indonesia's agrarian legal framework normatively affirms the principles of social justice, the social function of land, and restrictions on land ownership, land ownership and control remain concentrated in certain groups. This situation raises questions about the extent to which agricultural law is able to provide equitable protection for farmers. This study aims to analyze the regulation of agricultural land ownership within Indonesia's agricultural legal framework related to farmer protection, examine the factors causing inequality in land ownership that remain challenges in efforts to protect farmers under Indonesian agricultural law, and examine the role of Indonesian agricultural law in addressing inequality in land ownership to achieve equitable protection for farmers. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. Primary and secondary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively to assess the consistency of norms and the political direction of agrarian law. The results show that although Indonesian agrarian law normatively contains instruments for limiting and equalizing land ownership, inequality persists due to weak implementation, regulatory disharmony, and ambiguous policies between redistribution and investment. Protection of farmers in agricultural law depends on the state's consistency in internalizing the principles of social justice in the substance, institutions, and agrarian policies so that the law functions not only to regulate, but also to transform conditions of inequality in land ownership.
KONSEKUENSI SIFAT FINAL DAN MENGIKAT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN YANG BERPOTENSI KELIRU Dedi Mulyadi; Ardelia Lananda; Feyza Ashila Putri Hidayat; Suci Muldiyanti; Syifa Apriliani
Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Doktor Husni Ingratubun Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55551/jip.v7i1.720

Abstract

Constitutional Court decisions have the unique characteristic of being final and binding. This characteristic means that decisions made by the Constitutional Court immediately acquire permanent legal force upon pronouncement and are binding on all citizens, state institutions, and related parties. The absence of further legal remedies such as appeals, cassation, or judicial review makes Constitutional Court decisions absolute in the Indonesian constitutional system. On the one hand, this characteristic aims to guarantee legal certainty, maintain the stability of the legal system, and prevent conflicts of interpretation of the constitution. However, on the other hand, this final and binding nature can raise problems if the resulting decision has the potential to contain errors in the interpretation of norms, legal considerations, or resulting policy implications. This condition creates a dilemma between the principles of legal certainty and substantive justice in constitutional practice. This study aims to analyze the consequences of the final and binding nature of Constitutional Court decisions on the possibility of potentially erroneous decisions. The method used is a normative approach by examining relevant laws and regulations, legal theory, and doctrine. The results of the study show that although a final and binding nature is necessary to maintain the supremacy of the constitution, an academic oversight mechanism and constitutional evaluation are still needed to minimize the potential for errors in Constitutional Court decisions.
Co-Authors Dedi Mulyadi Feyza Ashila Putri Hidayat Kuswandi Saptaning Ruju Paminto Suci Muldiyanti Syifa Apriliani