Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Ripple Effect of Giving: How Youth Food Sharing Fosters Social Happiness and Capability Muhammad Sifa Fauzi Yulianis; Amir Bandar Abdul Majid Amir; Mohammad Suud; Salwa Abidah Zulfa; Gandes Hutami Ilmi; Vira Salsabella Anggraini; Robitul Huda; Nabila Meisya Fitri; Dio Fikri
TAAWUN Vol. 6 No. 01 (2026): TA'AWUN FEBRUARY 2026
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Al-Fattah Siman Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37850/taawun.v6i01.1225

Abstract

The food-sharing activity aims to analyze the impact of youth-based Community Service initiatives on the social welfare and collective happiness of urban communities in Surabaya, amid ongoing food insecurity despite a declining trend in poverty rates. This study employs a Participatory Community Engagement approach, positioning youth and beneficiary communities as active actors in the design, implementation, and reflection on social intervention programs. The analysis is developed by integrating social capital theory and a capability approach. The results of this study demonstrate two intertwined layers of impact. At the community level, food sharing not only helps meet basic nutritional needs but also enhances psychosocial well-being by strengthening a sense of security, social recognition, and inclusion among informal workers and economically vulnerable households. At the youth level, involvement in the Community Empowerment Program has been shown to strengthen social skills, empathy, a sense of purpose, and emotional well-being. These findings confirm that youth-driven food-sharing initiatives extend beyond charitable practices and function as participatory social interventions that strengthen social cohesion and community capacity. This study makes an original contribution by conceptualizing youth-based community services as a potentially scalable participatory service model, with strategic implications for urban social resilience policy and for research on prosociality, happiness, and community development.
Political Reality in Indonesia from the Perspective of Vilfredo Pareto Muhammad Sifa Fauzi Yulianis; Widia Ari Susanti
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1950

Abstract

According to Wilfredo Pareto, a sociologist, history demonstrates a continuous circulation of elites. This circulation occurs through two processes: the movement of individuals from lower social strata to higher social strata, and the replacement of governing elites by previously non-governing elites. When an elite group enters a position of political power, another elite group must leave that position. However, social theories such as Pareto’s elite circulation theory often encounter contradictions when confronted with empirical realities. The same situation occurs with Wilfredo Pareto’s theory of elite circulation when it is examined within the context of political reality in Indonesia. Empirical evidence indicates that political parties in Indonesia have not experienced effective elite circulation; instead, they tend to demonstrate practices of dynastic politics. This phenomenon can be observed during general elections and regional elections, where political candidates often consist of the same individuals or groups repeatedly. This study aims to examine Wilfredo Pareto’s elite circulation theory, analyze criticisms from other sociologists regarding Pareto’s theoretical perspective, and investigate how Pareto’s theory applies within Indonesian society. This research employs a library research method, namely research conducted by collecting relevant literature regarding Wilfredo Pareto’s elite circulation theory and subsequently describing and analyzing the collected data. The results indicate that, according to Pareto, political and governmental systems should experience changes, rotation, and movement among elites. Nevertheless, when applied to the Indonesian political context, Pareto’s theory appears to contradict reality. Indonesia demonstrates characteristics of dynastic politics, where individuals who are able to access political leadership and governmental positions are frequently those who possess close relationships with political party leaders. Consequently, political candidates in democratic processes such as elections and regional elections tend to remain unchanged, resulting in limited elite circulation.