Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy
Harmuzan
Universitas Alwashliyah Medan
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) Yang Dilakukan Suami Terhadap Istri : (Studi Putusan Nomor 2366/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mdn) Kemala Dewi Sembiring Brahmana; Joharsah; Harmuzan
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.4567

Abstract

Kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) di Indonesia masih menunjukkan angka yang mengkhawatirkan, khususnya ketika pelaku adalah suami terhadap istri, meskipun telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk serta jenis kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang dilakukan oleh suami terhadap istri, penerapan sanksi pidana berdasarkan putusan pengadilan, serta hambatan dalam penegakan hukum dan mekanisme perlindungan hukum bagi korban. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus melalui studi Putusan Nomor 2366/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Medan. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan yang meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, literatur hukum, dan jurnal ilmiah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbuatan terdakwa merupakan kekerasan fisik dalam lingkup rumah tangga yang termasuk delik biasa sehingga dapat diproses tanpa adanya pengaduan dari korban. Hakim menjatuhkan pidana penjara selama tujuh bulan berdasarkan Pasal 44 ayat (1) Undang-Undang PKDRT. Putusan tersebut sah secara hukum, namun belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan keadilan substantif bagi korban. Hambatan penegakan hukum ditemukan pada aspek yuridis dan non-yuridis, sehingga diperlukan penguatan pedoman pemidanaan dan perlindungan korban.
Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Cyber Crime Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik : (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor: 155/Pid.Sus/2024.PN.Tte) Hikmatul Aulia; Muhlizar; Harmuzan
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 1 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i1.4607

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum, penerapan sanksi, pertimbangan hakim, serta perlindungan hukum bagi korban dalam tindak pidana cyber crime, khususnya pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah meningkatnya kejahatan siber di Indonesia, salah satunya kasus pencemaran nama baik yang diputus dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ternate Nomor 155/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Tte. Kasus tersebut penting dikaji karena merupakan implementasi terbaru dari Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas UU ITE. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan hukum mengenai tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik melalui media elektronik diatur dalam Pasal 27A UU ITE hasil perubahan 2024. Dalam Putusan PN Ternate, hakim menjatuhkan pidana penjara 6 bulan dan denda Rp100.000.000,00 dengan pertimbangan bahwa unsur tindak pidana telah terpenuhi. Pertimbangan hakim menekankan pentingnya menjaga kehormatan individu di ruang digital serta memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi korban lebih menitikberatkan pada pemulihan nama baik, meskipun masih terdapat kendala pembuktian dan identifikasi pelaku karena sifat dunia maya yang anonim.
THE RIGHT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS TO SUE AS LEGAL STANDING IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DISPUTES IN INDONESIA: A NORMATIVE-COMPARATIVE STUDY FOLLOWING LAW NUMBER 11 OF 2020 Joharsah; Harmuzan; Sarah Furqoni; Ahmad Irham Tajhi
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): December
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Environmental disputes arising from state administrative decisions, including mining permits, large-scale plantation development, and infrastructure projects, increasingly require effective mechanisms for protecting collective environmental interests. One of the central legal issues is the legal standing of environmental organizations to challenge administrative decisions before the State Administrative Court (PTUN), particularly following the regulatory changes introduced by Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. This study aims to analyze the position of environmental organizations regarding legal standing in environmental administrative disputes, identify procedural and doctrinal obstacles faced by such organizations, and formulate legal reform recommendations to strengthen their role in environmental litigation. This research employs a normative legal research method using a doctrinal-comparative approach and a case approach. The study relies on secondary legal materials consisting of primary legal materials, including legislation and court decisions, secondary legal materials comprising scholarly literature and journal articles, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis combines juridical, comparative, and critical approaches to examine the relationship between legal norms, judicial practice, and the development of environmental administrative law. The findings indicate that environmental organizations can obtain legal standing when they are able to demonstrate a collective legal interest and a causal relationship between the contested administrative decision and significant environmental impacts. Nevertheless, their access to administrative litigation remains constrained by the high burden of scientific proof, inconsistent interpretation of collective legal interests, limited explicit procedural regulation, and uncertainty concerning the object of administrative disputes following changes to the environmental licensing system. The development of judicial practice and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2023 provides an important normative foundation for strengthening public interest standing in environmental disputes. The study recommends legislative reform to explicitly regulate the legal standing and procedural rights of environmental organizations, the establishment of proportionate scientific evidentiary standards, strengthening judicial and legal-professional capacity, and facilitating amicus curiae and public-interest litigation funding. These reforms are necessary to enhance access to environmental justice and strengthen public oversight of state administrative actions affecting environmental protection.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE DISSOLUTION OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES UNDER INDONESIAN CORPORATE LAW Harmuzan; Muhlizar; Qori Rizqiah H. Kalingga
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The dissolution of a Limited Liability Company (Perseroan Terbatas/PT) constitutes a complex legal process that extends beyond the termination of the company's legal entity status. It involves a series of legal consequences, particularly liquidation, settlement of corporate obligations, protection of creditors, shareholders, employees, consumers, and other stakeholders. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing the dissolution of Limited Liability Companies under Indonesian corporate law, examine the mechanisms and legal consequences of liquidation, and identify legal issues affecting legal certainty and stakeholder protection. This research employs a normative-juridical method by examining Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and its subsequent amendments, supported by relevant legal literature, scholarly opinions, and academic journal sources. The analysis indicates that the Indonesian legal framework provides a relatively comprehensive structure for corporate dissolution, including the grounds for dissolution, the continuation of the company's legal existence for liquidation purposes, and the authority and responsibilities of liquidators in settling corporate assets and obligations. However, implementation continues to face challenges, including delays in the settlement of corporate obligations, insufficient transparency in liquidation processes, weak supervision of liquidators, and potential conflicts of interest among stakeholders. These conditions demonstrate a gap between normative legal provisions (das sollen) and their implementation in practice (das sein), particularly in relation to creditor protection and minority shareholder interests. The study concludes that strengthening liquidation oversight, improving transparency and accountability, consistently implementing good corporate governance principles, and harmonizing relevant regulations are necessary to ensure that the dissolution of Limited Liability Companies is not only legally valid but also substantively fair and capable of providing sustainable legal certainty for all stakeholders.
Co-Authors Ahmad Irham Tajhi Hikmatul Aulia Joharsah Joharsah Joharsah Kemala Dewi Sembiring Brahmana Muhlizar Muhlizar Qori Rizqiah H. Kalingga Sarah Furqoni