Chaliza Yafirastiani Pangestu
Universitas Bhakti Asih Tangerang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EVALUASI PERAN APARAT PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Ramlin Ahmad; Chaliza Yafirastiani Pangestu; Yossy Aulia Fadli
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 14 No 1 (2026): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v14i1.1827

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of law enforcement officials in Indonesia in ensuring justice and legal certainty. It focuses on the effectiveness of law enforcement officials in addressing issues of corruption, drug abuse, and human rights violations. The methodology used is descriptive qualitative coupled with comparative analysis. Findings indicate structural challenges such as limited resources, integrity issues, and lack of coordination between institutions. Recommendations are provided for improving professionalism and reforming the law enforcement system.
AMNESTI TERHADAP HASTO KRISTIYANTO: ANTARA REKONSILIASI POLITIK DAN TANTANGAN SUPREMASI HUKUM DI INDONESIA Ramlin Ahmad; Heli Komarudin; Dhimas Dwi Putro Baharza; Azis Nur Arifin; Chaliza Yafirastiani Pangestu; Yossy Aulia Fadli
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 14 No 1 (2026): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v14i1.1854

Abstract

This study examines the granting of amnesty to Hasto Kristiyanto by the President of the Republic of Indonesia from July to August 2025. This study assesses the legal basis of the amnesty, the political process that accompanied it, and its impact on the principle of the rule of law and the eradication of corruption in Indonesia. The method used is a qualitative research with a document study approach—using news from mainstream media, official government statements, statements from the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), and analysis from legal experts. The results of the study found that although amnesty is officially the prerogative of the president after obtaining approval from the House of Representatives, granting amnesty to political actors in corruption cases creates an ethical and normative dilemma: it can be seen as a tool for political reconciliation, but has the potential to harm a sense of substantive justice and trust in law enforcement. Recommendation: There is a need for restrictions on amnesty policies for corruption cases through strong transparency mechanisms and increased accountability forums in the political and legal spheres.