Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Responsibility of Processed Food Business Actors in the Lawata Market Area for Food Products That Are Not Halal Certified Idris Saputra; Idaman Idaman; Muhammad Nazar; Endah Widiastuti; Fadhilah Eka Fahrani
Journal of Law, Social Science and Management Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): July - December
Publisher : Yayasan Cipta Anak Bangsa (YCAB) Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36685/jlssm.v6i6.1654

Abstract

Background: Halal certification on a product today has become a must. Because people will be more selective and reluctant to consume products that do not have halal certificates will be abandoned. Many products of processed food business actors in the lawata market area include halal labels but do not get halal certificates. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the responsibility of processed food business actors who distribute products in the lawata market area but do not have a halal certificate. Methods: This study uses a normative legal research method, which means that the author conducts a process to find a rule of law, legal principles, and legal doctrines to answer legal problems and produce an argument, as well as new theories or concepts as prescriptions in solving problems. Results: The legal responsibility of processed food business actors in the lawata market area for non-halal certified food products is regulated in Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Assurance (JPH). Halal certification is mandatory, especially for small Micro Enterprises no later than October 17, 2026 so that food products that are not halal certified and not labeled halal can no longer circulate in the community. Business actors who have obtained a halal certificate are required to include a halal label on the product packaging, certain parts of the product and/or certain places on the product. If business actors include halal labels that do not comply with the regulations, they can be subject to administrative sanctions in the form of: verbal reprimands, written warnings or revocation of products from circulation. Conclusion: These findings highlight the need for processed food business actors to meet the halal standards set by the government to ensure consumer trust, especially in carrying out their beliefs.
Application of the Principle of Functional Differentiation Within the Criminal Justice System Framework in Indonesia Through Law Number 20 Of 2025 on The Criminal Procedure Code Irwansyah Irwansyah; Handrawan; Idaman Idaman
Journal of Law, Social Science and Management Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Yayasan Cipta Anak Bangsa (YCAB) Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36685/jlssm.v3i1.2038

Abstract

Background: The implementation of Indonesia's Criminal Justice System (CJS) faces numerous challenges stemming from the formalistic-dogmatic application of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This rigid legal framework has resulted in procedural inflexibility, unresponsiveness to evolving legal needs, and various systemic inefficiencies including protracted legal proceedings, inadequate inter-institutional coordination among law enforcement agencies (police, prosecutors, judiciary, and correctional institutions), abuse of power, and overlapping jurisdictional authorities. The principle of Functional Differentiation represents a legal normative framework that mandates law enforcement officials to execute their duties based on professional and proportionate standards within the CJS. Objective: This study examines the regulation and implementation of the Principle of Functional Differentiation in Indonesia's CJS through Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code. Method: The research employs a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze primary legal sources and doctrinal literature. Results: Findings indicate that the principle serves as a preventive mechanism against abuse of power and jurisdictional overlap while facilitating due process of law through clear separation of authorities among law enforcement agencies. This Division of Power framework establishes checks and balances between institutions, enabling the realization of an Integrated Criminal Justice System (ICJS). Conclusion: The study concludes that the Principle of Functional Differentiation, when implemented responsively and progressively, serves as the ideal legal foundation (recht ideal) for achieving the tripartite normative objectives of legal certainty, justice, and utility in Indonesia's criminal justice system.
The Paradox of Mental Health Literacy on Social Media: Between Information Accessibility and the Risk of Digital Misinformation Citra Marhan citra; Idaman idaman; Amalia Rizqa Amalia; Sry Anugrawati Rahim; Nurmaya Nurmaya; Lia Andhriyani Rusli
Journal of Law, Social Science and Management Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Yayasan Cipta Anak Bangsa (YCAB) Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36685/jlssm.v3i1.2043

Abstract

Background: Social media has become a major source of mental health information, increasing access to psychoeducational content while simultaneously facilitating the spread of misinformation. Although studies have examined mental health literacy and health misinformation separately, research exploring their interaction within social media environments remains limited. Objective: This study investigated how mental health literacy functions in digital environments affected by misinformation. Specifically, it examined patterns of exposure to mental health information, the relationship between literacy and susceptibility to misinformation, and the influence of platform characteristics on users’ information processing. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. The qualitative phase involved in-depth interviews with eight participants aged 20–26 years who actively engaged with mental health content on Instagram and TikTok. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. A subsequent quantitative phase will involve a cross-sectional survey (target N≥400) assessing mental health literacy, digital health literacy, misinformation exposure, platform characteristics, and mental health outcomes using validated instruments. Results: Five themes emerged: increased accessibility and openness, self-diagnosis behavior, anonymity and behavioral disinhibition, stigma reduction versus reinforcement, and challenges in evaluating content credibility. Participants frequently reported difficulty distinguishing professional expertise from non-expert opinions. Conclusions: Social media presents a paradoxical environment in which greater access to mental health information coexists with increased exposure to misinformation. Strengthening digital health literacy, source evaluation skills, and platform accountability is essential to maximize benefits while minimizing potential harms. Keywords: mental health literacy, digital misinformation, self-diagnosis, online disinhibition effect, algorithmic amplification