Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Patient Safety Culture in Pre-Post Partum and Perinatology Units Suci, Wice Purwani; Erika, Erika; Lestari, Widia; T, Nurhannifah Rizky; Maria, Riamin; Sunairattanaporn, Usa
Jurnal Pendidikan Keperawatan Indonesia Vol 10, No 1 (2024): Volume 10, Nomor 1, Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jpki.v10i1.71211

Abstract

Introduction: Effective patient safety practices in pre-post partum and perinatology units are crucial for ensuring high-quality care for mothers and children. These practices are expected to reduce maternal and child mortality rates, which remain significant. Patient safety implementation in hospitals depends largely on the patient safety culture within each institution. Objective: This study aimed to assess the application of patient safety culture in pre-post partum and perinatology wards. Methods: The research employed a mixed-methods approach with a sequential explanatory design. Quantitative data were gathered using the AHRQ (Agency for Health Research and Quality) questionnaire. Meanwhile, the qualitative research used an instrumental case study approach insights were derived from in-depth interviews with 52 nurses working in these units. Results: Results show an overall positive response rate of 67.8% across the 12 dimensions of patient safety culture, indicating satisfactory levels. The dimension with the highest positive response rate is teamwork at 38%, while openness had the lowest at 6%. Challenges in patient safety program implementation include lack of safety culture surveys, inadequate incident reporting systems, high blaming culture, lack of support, delayed case reporting, and financial constraints. Reporting, analysis, and evaluation are predominantly limited to internal hospital processes. Conclusion: The obstacles encountered in implementing a patient safety culture are the behavior of healthcare workers and the lack of optimal support from management. The recommendations given are the formation of a Patient Safety Committee, education about safety culture for healthcare workers, Monitoring and evaluation of the patient safety program that has been implemented.
Survivorship Care Effects on Gynecological and Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nasution, Lina Anisa; Fitriana, Lisna Anisa; Darmawati, Irma; Pragholapati, Andria; Dharmansyah, Dhika; Sunairattanaporn, Usa
JURNAL INFO KESEHATAN Vol 24 No 1 (2026): JURNAL INFO KESEHATAN
Publisher : Research and Community Service Unit, Poltekkes Kemenkes Kupang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31965/infokes.Vol24.Iss1.2166

Abstract

Survivorship care aims to address the long-term physical and psychosocial needs of cancer survivors, yet evidence regarding its effectiveness and optimal components remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of survivorship care interventions on quality of life and related outcomes among gynecological and breast cancer survivors and explored intervention components associated with improved outcomes with PRISMA guidelines. Seven databases were searched for English-language studies involving adult gynecological and/or breast cancer survivors who had completed primary treatment and received survivorship care interventions compared with usual care. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023402234). Eight randomized controlled trials comprising 1,464 participants were included. Survivorship care interventions significantly improved overall quality of life (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08–0.44), physical well-being (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.12–0.41), mental well-being (SMD = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.03–0.31), and reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.00–0.41), with low to moderate heterogeneity across outcomes. Subgroup analyses indicated that multimodal interventions incorporating lectures, discussions, consultations, and online coaching particularly those supported by mobile health applications were associated with greater benefits, especially in physical well-being. Several studies demonstrated moderate risk of bias, mainly related to randomization and reporting. Survivorship care interventions provide small to moderate clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life and psychosocial outcomes among gynecological and breast cancer survivors. These findings support the integration of structured, multidisciplinary, and technology assisted survivorship care into routine oncology practice, while highlighting the need for higher quality, context sensitive trials.