Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Inicio Legis : Jurnal Hukum
Ajeng Pramesthy H.K
university of Jember
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Komparatif CSR Migas Berdasarkan Hukum Nasional dan SDGs Ajeng Pramesthy H.K; Risqiana Risqiana; Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro
Inicio Legis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Vol 6, No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/il.v6i2.31480

Abstract

Sektor minyak dan gas bumi (migas) berperan vital dalam perekonomian Indonesia, namun aktivitasnya sering menimbulkan dampak sosial dan lingkungan yang signifikan. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) menjadi instrumen strategis untuk menyeimbangkan kepentingan bisnis dengan tuntutan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis secara komparatif model CSR perusahaan migas di Indonesia berdasarkan instrumen hukum nasional serta menilai implikasinya terhadap pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis komparatif, didukung studi literatur, telaah dokumen hukum, dan analisis laporan tahunan perusahaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan dua model utama CSR, yaitu compliance-based yang berorientasi pada kepatuhan hukum, dan empowerment-based yang fokus pada pemberdayaan masyarakat. Model yang terintegrasi dengan prinsip Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) serta selaras dengan SDGs terbukti lebih efektif meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat, memperkuat legitimasi sosial, dan mendukung keberlanjutan operasional perusahaan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan harmonisasi regulasi, penetapan standar minimal pelaksanaan CSR, serta penguatan mekanisme evaluasi berbasis partisipasi untuk memaksimalkan kontribusi CSR sektor migas terhadap pembangunan berkelanjutan di Indonesia.
Agricultural Diversification through Contract Farming for Farmers’ Sustainable Welfare in Jember Ajeng Pramesthy H.K; tegar raffi jumantoro; Emi Zulaika
Inicio Legis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Vol 7, No 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/il.v7i1.33411

Abstract

Agricultural diversification is an important strategy for improving farmers’ welfare and supporting agricultural sustainability. One approach that has gained increasing attention is contract farming as a partnership scheme between farmers and agribusiness enterprises. However, its implementation in Jember Regency faces challenges, including low legal literacy among farmers, inadequate legal protection, and weak partnership institutions. This study aims to analyze the implementation of contract farming as a strategy for agricultural diversification and to formulate a legal policy model that supports its sustainability. Using a socio-legal approach with a qualitative method, the study finds that contract farming has not fully established balanced partnerships due to unequal bargaining positions, insufficient contractual protection, and the absence of adequate local regulations. Therefore, strengthening regulations, farmer protection, and partnership institutions is essential to support the sustainability of contract farming.
Protection of Minority Investors Regarding the Implementation of Multiple-Voting Shareholders in Indonesian Digital Startups Ajeng Pramesthy H.K; Evyta Rosiyanti Ramadhani; Faysa Alya Ma’ari; Rita Septiyanur Rizki Perdana
Inicio Legis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Vol 7, No 2 (2026): November
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/il.v7i2.36374

Abstract

 Indonesia’s Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 22/POJK.04/2021 permits startups organized as limited liability companies to issue multiple voting shares at their initial public offering, creating a structural wedge between economic ownership and voting power that risks abuse in general meetings to the detriment of minority investors. Employing normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, this article examines the standing and limits of multiple-voting shareholders in general meetings, the legal consequences of voting-right abuse under the fiduciary duty doctrine, and the effectiveness of available mitigation instruments for minority investors. The analysis finds that POJK 22/2021 imposes preventive quantitative and procedural safeguards, yet fiduciary duty textually binds only directors and commissioners, so voting-right abuse must instead be pursued through tort liability and piercing the corporate veil, while existing repressive instruments remain constrained by voting-based ownership thresholds. Strengthening contractual mechanisms and regulatory supervision is therefore necessary for effective minority-investor protection.
Co-Authors Emi Zulaika Evyta Rosiyanti Ramadhani Faysa Alya Ma’ari Risqiana Risqiana Rita Septiyanur Rizki Perdana tegar raffi jumantoro Tegar Raffi Putra Jumantoro