Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal An-Nahdloh: Journal of Education and Islamic Studies
Muhammad Alfin Asy-Syakuuri
Institut Agama Islam Tasikmalaya
Religion Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Eutanasia dalam Perspektif Masā’il Fiqhiyyah Muhammad Alfin Asy-Syakuuri; Zulfa Nurfaidah; Astri Nur Asfiah
An-Nahdloh: Journal of Education and Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : An-Nahdloh: Journal of Education and Islamic Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Current advances in the medical world have opened up opportunities for people to extend their lives thanks to various innovative health technologies. However, on the other hand, this has also encouraged the emergence of euthanasia as a means to alleviate suffering in terminally ill patients. Euthanasia is a highly debated topic, particularly within Islamic law, as it relates to the right to life and the prohibition of actions that take life. This study aims to explore the definition of euthanasia, its types, and the laws governing its implementation from the perspective of Masā'il Fiqhiyyah. This study adopted a qualitative method with a normative approach through a literature analysis of both classical and contemporary fiqh sources, as well as fatwas issued by Islamic institutions. The research findings indicate that active euthanasia is generally considered haram (forbidden) because it is an act that directly takes life. Meanwhile, passive euthanasia remains a topic of debate among Islamic scholars, particularly in certain situations, such as discontinuing treatment that offers no prospect of recovery. In the context of Islamic jurisprudence (Masā'il Fiqhiyyah), determining the law regarding euthanasia takes into account the maqasid of sharia, particularly in protecting the soul (ḥifẓ al-nafs), as well as the principles of Islamic jurisprudence that emphasize the need to prevent harm rather than achieve benefit. Therefore, the study of euthanasia in Islam requires a comprehensive ijtihad approach to provide solutions to the challenges of modern medicine without neglecting Sharia principles.   Keywords: Euthanasia, Contemporary Fiqh, Masā’il Fiqhiyyah, Maqashid Sharia
Analisis Komparatif Aliran Khawarij, Mu’tazilah, dan Asy‘ariyah terhadap Pelaku Dosa Besar dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Akidah Islam Yanto Maulana Restu; Muhammad Alfin Asy-Syakuuri; Nafilatul Mubarokah; Naswa Khairunisa; Tina Risdiyanti
An-Nahdloh: Journal of Education and Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : An-Nahdloh: Journal of Education and Islamic Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58788/jeis.v1i3.100

Abstract

In Islamic theology, the debate over the status of those who commit major sins (kabā'ir) is an important issue that greatly influences the formation of concepts of faith, deeds, and salvation.  Views on the status of those who commit major sins differ among the three main schools of thought: the Khawarij, the Mu'tazilah, and the Asy'ariyah.  While the Mu'tazilah consider them to be manzilah baina al-manzilatain—between believers and unbelievers—the Khawarij consider them to be unbelievers who have left Islam.  According to the Asy'ariyah, people who commit major sins remain believers, even though they are fāsiq, and their fate is ultimately decided by Allah. Using qualitative methodology and a literature review approach, this study analyzes the perspectives of these three schools of thought and their implications for Islamic creed education. The data collected came from primary and secondary literature discussing contemporary and classical Islamic theology. The analysis was conducted descriptively and comparatively to describe the conceptual differences between each school of thought and assess the pedagogical values that can be integrated into faith learning. The results of the study show that the differences in the views of the three schools of thought have theological and pedagogical consequences. Asy'ariyah offers space for spiritual rehabilitation and moderation, while Khawarij emphasizes moral firmness.  By teaching proportionally and comparatively, the three schools of thought can enrich faith education to shape students who are critical, moderate, and have good character.  This study confirms that a comparative theological approach in Islamic education is crucial to prevent extremism and create a balanced and contextual understanding of faith in today's world.   Keywords: Perpetrators of Major Sins, Islamic Theology, Khawarij, Mu'tazilah, and Asy'ariyah, Education in Faith, Religious Moderation
Co-Authors Astri Nur Asfiah Nafilatul Mubarokah Naswa Khairunisa Tina Risdiyanti Yanto Maulana Restu Zulfa Nurfaidah