Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.126
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Asep Suherman
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bengkulu
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Keadilan Substantif Dalam Perkara Cybercrime: Studi Perbandingan Putusan Baiq Nuril (Indonesia) Dan United States V. Aleynikov (As) Muhammad Rizky Syafrizal; Frayoga Agustian; Habib Nurhammad; Riandra mahanugrah; Tegar Septian Gumilang; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Januari-Februari
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/j0s30876

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of substantive justice in cybercrime cases through a comparative study of the Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia No. 574 K/Pid.Sus/2018 in the Baiq Nuril case and the United States v. Aleynikov case (No. 12-2075, 2nd Cir. 2012). This research employs a normative legal method with statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that in the Baiq Nuril case, the court emphasized a formal-legalistic approach, which did not fully reflect substantive justice. In contrast, in United States v. Aleynikov, the court strictly applied the principle of legality, prioritizing legal certainty over substantive justice considerations. The differences between the civil law system in Indonesia and the common law system in the United States influence judicial reasoning in cybercrime adjudication. This study concludes that a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice is required in cybercrime enforcement to ensure a responsive legal system in the digital era.
Peran Dan Keterbatasan Bukti Digital Dalam Proses Peradilan Di International Criminal Court Amanda Putri; Sania Ulfatun Nikmah; Naura Putri Ramadhania; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology has brought significant changes to the evidentiary system in international criminal law, particularly in the judicial process at the International Criminal Court. This study aims to analyze the role and limitations of digital evidence in supporting the process of proving international crimes, while also examining its implications for the principle of fair trial. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, through a literature review of various relevant primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The results show that digital evidence, such as video recordings, photographs, satellite imagery, and data from social media and open source intelligence (OSINT), plays a strategic role in uncovering facts, reconstructing events, and identifying perpetrators of international crimes, especially in conflict situations that are difficult to access directly. However, its use still faces various limitations, including those related to the validity, authenticity, and reliability of the evidence, and the lack of uniform international standards for its management. Furthermore, the complexity of digital evidence also poses challenges to the fulfillment of the principle of fair trial, particularly regarding the defendant's right to examine the evidence. Therefore, strengthening the legal framework, international standardization, and increasing technical capacity are necessary to ensure that the use of digital evidence supports the achievement of effective and integrated justice in the international criminal justice system.
Perbandingan Norma Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Online Dalam Hukum Indonesia Dan Singapura Mutia Aulia Apriadi; Naurah Edsa Zakiyah; Nadine Alysa Azura; Dhiyaa Husniyyah; Fourega Gamelia Lubis; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Januari-Februari
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/y5awwe58

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital technology in Southeast Asia has intensified online interactions while simultaneously increasing cases of online defamation. This development creates tension between the need to protect individual reputation and the guarantee of freedom of expression, particularly in light of differing regulatory approaches between Indonesia and Singapore. This study aims to analyze the criminal regulation of online defamation in both jurisdictions, identify their similarities and differences, and formulate recommendations for a more proportionate legal framework. The research employs normative legal research using statute, comparative, conceptual, and case approaches, analyzed qualitatively through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. The findings indicate that Indonesia still faces issues of normative ambiguity and relatively expansive criminalization, whereas Singapore adopts a more selective approach with civil remedies as the primary mechanism and criminal law positioned as ultimum remedium. These results highlight the need for normative reformulation, strengthened enforcement guidelines, and harmonization with international human rights standards. In conclusion, Indonesia’s cyber defamation regime should move toward a more proportionate, precise, and balanced model that protects reputation without undermining freedom of expression.
Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Konvensional dan Hukum Pidana Digital dalam Mengatur Kejahatan Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan di Indonesia Muhamad Reyhan Saputra Saputra; Muhammad Rofiq; Habib Dwi Putra; Rusma Renal Cholif; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Januari-Februari
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/fhnqvz37

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has serious implications for the legal order, particularly criminal law. Crimes involving AI systems whether as tools, subjects, or autonomous actors pose new challenges that cannot be adequately addressed by conventional criminal law. This study aims to analyze the comparison between conventional criminal law and digital criminal law in regulating AI-based crimes in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with comparative and conceptual approaches. The results show that conventional criminal law has fundamental limitations in terms of legal subjects, causality, and criminal liability when dealing with AI systems. Digital criminal law as represented by the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) has also not comprehensively accommodated AI-based crimes. Indonesia needs special regulations (lex specialis) that place artificial intelligence as a separate object of regulation within the national criminal law system.
Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Negara Singapura Dan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Mengenai Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Riqa Kurnia Sabilla; Aurellya Ramadhani Syainda Putri; Yudi Anugrah Pratama; Muhammad Akbar Dzakira; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Criminal law is a set of regulations aimed at preventing criminal acts by deterring individuals from committing offenses. In the field of comparative criminal law, the study of its object focuses on analyzing criminal law disciplines to gain a deeper understanding of investigative methods and legal procedures. One example of comparative criminal law can be seen in the study of premeditated murder offenses in Indonesia and Singapore, which share similarities and differences in their legal systems. This discussion focuses on two main aspects: the application of sanctions for premeditated murder based on Indonesian criminal law (Article 340 of the Criminal Code) and Singaporean criminal law (Penal Code Act 224), as well as an analysis of the similarities and differences in the systematic approach of both regulations.This research employs a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical nature, relying on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. In Singapore, premeditated murder is regulated under Section 300 of the Penal Code Act 224, which imposes the death penalty. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, premeditated murder is stipulated in Article 340 of the Criminal Code, which provides sanctions in the form of the death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a maximum term of 20 years.In general, Indonesia and Singapore have distinct legal systems. However, regarding the regulation of premeditated murder, both countries share similarities in legal provisions, while differences exist in terms of legal subjects and the application of sanctions.
Konstruksi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Kekerasan Dalam Relasi Pacaran Yang Mengandung Ketimpangan Usia: Analisis Normatif Naurah Afifah Nurwati; Putri Maharani; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Januari - Maret
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study outlines the urgency of legal protection for children who are victims of violence in the context of romantic relationships with significant age differences. In such relationship dynamics, the age difference is not merely a statistical figure, but a determinant factor that creates unequal power relations. The chronologically more mature party generally has dominance in emotional, economic, and life experience aspects, which is then used as an instrument to control, dominate, and even manipulate the child who is still psychologically developing. Furthermore, this striking age difference fundamentally invalidates the validity of the child's consent. Legally and psychologically, the consent given by children in unequal relationships is often false, born of invisible psychological pressure, a sense of dependency, or the child's inability to identify forms of exploitation. This leaves children in a highly vulnerable position to a wide spectrum of violence, ranging from physical violence and psychological trauma to sexual exploitation, often disguised as a romantic relationship.
Implementasi Konsep Penologi Dan Panitensier Dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia Aziza Nandhita; Nabila Fitriani; Asep Suherman
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Januari - Maret
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penology and panitentiary are branches of criminal law that study the objectives of punishment and the rehabilitation system for criminal offenders. In the Indonesian legal context, these concepts are reflected in the correctional system, which aims not only to impose punishment but also to provide rehabilitation so that inmates can reintegrate into society. This article aims to analyze the implementation of the concepts of penology and panitentiary in the Indonesian correctional system. The method used in this paper is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the Indonesian correctional system has essentially adopted the principles of penology and panitentiary, which emphasize rehabilitation, rehabilitation, and social reintegration for inmates. However, in practice, various obstacles remain, such as limited facilities and infrastructure, overcrowding in correctional institutions, and limited optimal rehabilitation programs. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve the quality of the correctional system so that the goals of humanistic and rehabilitation-oriented punishment can be effectively achieved.
Co-Authors Amanda Putri Aurellya Ramadhani Syainda Putri Aziza Nandhita Dhiyaa Husniyyah Fourega Gamelia Lubis Frayoga Agustian Habib Dwi Putra Habib Nurhammad Muhamad Reyhan Saputra Saputra Muhammad Akbar Dzakira Muhammad Rizky Syafrizal Muhammad Rofiq Mutia Aulia Apriadi Nabila Fitriani Nadine Alysa Azura Naura Putri Ramadhania Naurah Afifah Nurwati Naurah Edsa Zakiyah Putri Maharani Riandra mahanugrah Riqa Kurnia Sabilla Rusma Renal Cholif Sania Ulfatun Nikmah Tegar Septian Gumilang Yudi Anugrah Pratama