Yevhen Leheza
Dnipro Humanitarian University, Ukraine

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Interpretation of Regulatory and Legal Acts in Contemporary Contexts: Foreign Experience, Comparative Perspectives, and Pathways for Regulatory Reform Yevhen Leheza; Oleksandr Kurakin; Olha Shapovalova; Kateryna Sokh; Artur Makarov
Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18727992

Abstract

This article examines the theoretical and legal foundations of interpreting regulatory and legal acts in contemporary contexts, with particular emphasis on integrating foreign experience into the Ukrainian legal system. The study aims to identify methodological gaps in domestic interpretative practice and to formulate pathways for regulatory reform aligned with European standards. Employing a comparative legal methodology, the research analyses interpretative approaches across continental systems (Germany and France) and Anglo-Saxon systems (Great Britain and the United States), as well as the jurisprudence of supranational judicial institutions, notably the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis combines doctrinal examination, case-law review, and systemic legal analysis. The findings demonstrate that the continental tradition ensures coherence, systematicity, and legal certainty, whereas the precedent-based model emphasises flexibility, judicial creativity, and practical justice. In contrast, interpretative practice in Ukraine remains predominantly formalistic, lacks methodological integration, and is insufficiently responsive to the dynamics of European integration. The study substantiates the feasibility of combining domestic legal traditions with advanced European interpretative methods, particularly teleological, systemic, and evolutionary approaches oriented toward the rule of law and human rights protection. It further argues for strengthening the Supreme Court's role in ensuring uniform judicial practice and fostering doctrinal development. The article contributes to comparative legal scholarship by proposing a structured model of interpretative reform that bridges continental and precedent-based traditions. Its practical significance lies in enhancing the quality of law enforcement, promoting harmonisation with European legal standards, and fostering a modern culture of legal interpretation responsive to contemporary regulatory challenges.
Education as a Strategic Instrument for Human Rights Protection: Innovations and European Best Practices Yevhen Leheza; Nataliia Zadyraka; Yuliia Leheza
Nusantara Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Nusantara Education
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66325/nusantaraeducation.v5i2.263

Abstract

Education has increasingly become a strategic instrument for promoting, implementing, and safeguarding human rights amid rapid social transformation and democratic development. However, despite ongoing educational reforms, human rights education in Ukraine remains fragmented and insufficiently aligned with European standards, limiting its contribution to fostering legal awareness and democratic citizenship. This study aims to examine the role of education in ensuring human rights, analyze the implementation of human rights education across selected European Union countries, identify transferable best practices, and formulate policy recommendations to strengthen Ukraine's educational framework in line with European standards. This research employed a qualitative field research design using a comparative legal approach. Empirical data were collected through semi-structured interviews with educators, legal scholars, policymakers, and curriculum developers in Ukraine, complemented by field observations of educational institutions and document analysis of national legislation, educational policies, and European normative frameworks. The findings reveal that Germany, France, Finland, and Poland have institutionalized human rights education as an integral component of compulsory civic education through interdisciplinary curricula, participatory learning methods, teacher professional development, and digital educational resources. By contrast, Ukraine continues to implement human rights education inconsistently across educational levels, resulting in uneven legal literacy and civic competence. The study further demonstrates that adapting European educational practices requires contextualization within Ukraine's legal, institutional, and socio-cultural environment, supported by curriculum reform, teacher capacity building, digital innovation, and strengthened cooperation with European and international organizations. The originality of this research lies in integrating empirical field evidence with comparative legal analysis to develop a comprehensive framework for reforming human rights education in Ukraine. These findings advance legal education scholarship and provide practical guidance for policymakers, educational institutions, and curriculum developers seeking to modernize national education systems while reinforcing democratic values and sustainable human rights protection.